<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:29:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225480#Comment_225480</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225480#Comment_225480</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 12:01:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've been to see her family and they are not very happy that there mother has been dooped into providing a statement!!! They are going to help her withdraw the statement formally. <br /><br />Unbelievable people we are dealing with here. They have even mentioned in their statements that I quoted the Clean Air Act when they self installed the none Defra exempt boiler. I would have thought that would be a blatant breach of the CAA in a smoke control area, especially when they were burning painted wood, which they have admitted to in their statements!!! <br /><br />Mikeee5]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225484#Comment_225484</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225484#Comment_225484</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 13:49:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[It still might be worth asking Age Concern or the local community support officer to look in to it because if an outside independent agency supports the view that undue harassment or pressure was used this will carry a lot of weight and I would have thought be quite detrimental to the other side.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225503#Comment_225503</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225503#Comment_225503</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2015 21:49:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The trouble is she is a vulnerable adult Peter. She's got agoraphobia and has only been coming out of her house over the past few years. She gets very confused too. She's very upset about the ordeal and I think it will upset her even more if the community support officer turns up. I think I've got to leave it to the family, I just hope the Smelly Tubies don't put anymore pressure on her.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225524#Comment_225524</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225524#Comment_225524</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:55:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Peter_in_Hungary</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Perhaps get the community support officer to talk to the family first. - Or get the family to talk to the community support officer by way of making a complaint.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225527#Comment_225527</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225527#Comment_225527</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:19:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[That's a good idea Peter, I'll have a quiet word. <br /><br />I've been watching Judge Rinder on TV. There's been one or two neighbour disputes on there which have been quite interesting. I've picked up some useful jargon like "lawful evidence". I've spent most of the weekend arranging an overview and facts of the situation ready for the big day.  I have certainly acrued a wealth of lawful bumff now, it's quite amazing how its all come together, I just hope the judge likes reading!! <br /><br />Mikeee5]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225615#Comment_225615</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225615#Comment_225615</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:13:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[More likely an underling will read and report I should think]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225768#Comment_225768</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225768#Comment_225768</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2015 11:56:41 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Have you got another link to the wood smoke and cancer information please Peter. I'm strugling to open the PDF.<br /><br />Cheers <br /><br />Mikeee5]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225772#Comment_225772</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225772#Comment_225772</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2015 15:53:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>PeterStarck</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Mikeee5, I've converted it to a text file so try that.<br /><br />If not try <a href="http://woodburnersmoke.net/Dorothy-Woodsmoke_Cancer_May2011.pdf" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://woodburnersmoke.net/Dorothy-Woodsmoke_Cancer_May2011.pdf</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225803#Comment_225803</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=225803#Comment_225803</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:30:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thanks for that Peter. Certainly a wealth of information there! Still from other countries from around the globe, wonder when we will catch up!!! <br /><br />All the information I have read in the past has said there is no known safe level of particulate matter exposure from wood smoke!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226128#Comment_226128</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226128#Comment_226128</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:52:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamestoldme</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Have you seen this:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fine-particulate-matter-pm2-5-in-the-uk" target="_self" rel="nofollow">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fine-particulate-matter-pm2-5-in-the-uk</a>]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226296#Comment_226296</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226296#Comment_226296</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 16:38:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Thats an interesting find James. Los like that has been written since the start of my smoke problem.<br /><br />I'm just finalising my response to the defendants statements and there are that many lies in them it's unreal. It looks like they are trying to assassinate mine and my wife's characters and trying to make out we are the bad guys in all this. As mentioned previously, I've never been to court before and I'm not sure how it will be seen by the judge if I were to point out the "untruths" . <br /><br />Have learned this week that the expert witness is not allowed to attend court too which is a bit of a blow! <br /><br />Mikeee5]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226298#Comment_226298</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226298#Comment_226298</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:04:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Mikeee5</cite>Have learned this week that the expert witness is not allowed to attend court too which is a bit of a blow!<br /></blockquote> So how is justice served by not allowing him to attend? <br /><br />What was the reason given that would disqualify his attendance?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226301#Comment_226301</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226301#Comment_226301</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 17:30:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Mikeee5</cite>I'm just finalising my response to the defendants statements and there are that many lies in them it's unreal. It looks like they are trying to assassinate mine and my wife's characters and trying to make out we are the bad guys in all this. As mentioned previously, I've never been to court before and I'm not sure how it will be seen by the judge if I were to point out the "untruths" .</blockquote><br />What I'd like to say is: "Don't call people liars - don't refer to their statements at all. But do make a clear statement of the truth of whatever facts it is that are stated wrongly." But without seeing all the documents, I can't be absolutely sure that's the right advice.<br /><br />+1 on Triassic's question]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226303#Comment_226303</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226303#Comment_226303</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:13:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm not sure of the reason that disqualified his attendance. My solicitor has been on holiday all week, it was his assistant that told me there was no expert witnesses allowed to attend court. My solicitor told me that the Environmental Health officer wasn't allowed to attend a few months back,  I believe it was because he was an employee of my local authority. <br /><br />Djh, that's pretty much what I've done. I've responded to their statements with the true facts and have emailed them to my solicitor. They are playing very heavily on "the council say we're doing nothing wrong and no nuisance exists". Tinki Winki has witnessed the fumes on my property, they know damn well there is a problem!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226304#Comment_226304</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226304#Comment_226304</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:33:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bot de paille</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I would stay well away from getting into "no but he said, she said" type arguments that risks both parties looking like squabbling children.<br /><br /> Stick to the facts and present your arguments in a lucid and level headed manner without resorting to emotion  and hopefully this will enable the magistrate to use his/her professionalism to examine the facts clearly.<br /><br /> I think your main chance of winning is if they see that your complaints are valid and reasonably presented, and not just a frivolous "neighbors who dont get on" tiff]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226326#Comment_226326</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226326#Comment_226326</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:55:22 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Well said Bot. I was thinking along the same lines, it could get very messy if not careful. I think the smelly tubbies have done it for that exact reason, throwing disruption into the mix. I was warned about this a couple of years ago when I spoke to an environmental consultancy! <br /><br />I'd like to do a presentation and tell it like it is if possible.There's not a single thing been falsified. The videos of the smoke returning to ground don't lie and the witnesses that are coming with me have all witnessed the severity of the fumes first hand. <br /><br />Mikeee5]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226330#Comment_226330</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226330#Comment_226330</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:02:09 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>CWatters</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Seems daft that unqualified witnesses are allowed but expert ones aren't.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226337#Comment_226337</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226337#Comment_226337</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:48:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: CWatters</cite>Seems daft that unqualified witnesses are allowed but expert ones aren't.</blockquote><br />Yes, there must be more to the story; hence Triassic's question.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226338#Comment_226338</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226338#Comment_226338</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:22:51 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>owlman</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Could it be something to do with the fact that  "expert witnesses" are generally there to help the court decide on the facts and not reinforce one parties standpoint over the other. <br />Presumably if one particular "expert" written statement appears to carry weight or is inconsistent and requires clarification then the court will decide if that expert is called for cross examination by either the judge and/or both parties.<br /><br />I'm no expert only guessing]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226340#Comment_226340</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226340#Comment_226340</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:33:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've spoken to the solicitor earlier and I think he said the court won't allow it because it's a  litigation case. However, we can rely on the expert witnesses report, it just means the expert witness won't be their to get cross examined!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226352#Comment_226352</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226352#Comment_226352</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:11:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bot de paille</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[As I understand it, UK law was changed several years ago so that courts have the right to refuse experts witnesses. One of the main reasons for this reform was to speed up litigation court cases where the calling of expert witnesses was seen to bog  down proceedings. <br /><br />The court can refuse EWs for a number of reasons, if they feel it is not necessary.<br /><br />The argument has been made that the refusal to allow an EW might prejudice the chances of a persons ability to present their case in a fair manner. There is even an article of the European Humans Rights act that has precedence over UK law, to the effect that a persons right to EWs in court is a human right to be enforced by law. <br /><br />So far any appeals made in referencing the European Human Rights act have failed, ie UK courts are just ignoring it for the moment. You could make an appeal Mikeee5 but its probably not going to succeed and might even turn the court against you.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226353#Comment_226353</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226353#Comment_226353</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:17:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bot de paille</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Let your neighbors play silly games and lie, it may work in your favor if they go too far, falling on their own sword when the court realizes what type of characters they are.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226367#Comment_226367</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226367#Comment_226367</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:50:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've done a few searches on the expert witnesses not being allowed in court and as you say there are a number of reasons that they may not be allowed to attend. The smelly tubbies have requested that they produce a report from an expert witness regarding the carbon monoxide readings that were included in the report. It will be interesting to see if the court allows that! We've had the disclosure now and I think it will conflict with the evidence already disclosed, I don't think it should be allowed! <br /><br />Thanks for you reasurance too bot, let's hope the court sees these people for what they really are!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226505#Comment_226505</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226505#Comment_226505</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:08:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>db8000</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Mikeee5</cite>I've done a few searches on the expert witnesses not being allowed in court and as you say there are a number of reasons that they may not be allowed to attend. The smelly tubbies have requested that they produce a report from an expert witness regarding the carbon monoxide readings that were included in the report. It will be interesting to see if the court allows that! We've had the disclosure now and I think it will conflict with the evidence already disclosed, I don't think it should be allowed!<br /><br />Thanks for you reasurance too bot, let's hope the court sees these people for what they really are!</blockquote><br /><br />It doesn't sound like the expert witnesses has been refused but that only he/she can give evidence in writing.  If that is the case then sometimes there is an opportunity to put further questions to the expert for answering before the hearing - that might depend on the directions from the court.<br /><br />That the expert witness is not attending is not altogether surprising if the expert is a joint expert.  There is the issue of proportionality fro the court's point of view and if the expert is joint, there cannot be any cross-examination.<br /><br />If the expert is not joint (i.e. instructed by one side or the other only) then it is more surprising that they are not allowed to attend but again the judge may have decided that the case is more proportionality dealt with this way.  An expert in attendance and cross-examined will add half a day to a trial.<br /><br />The expert's report should be addressed to the court and must state that they understand their duties to the court.<br /><br />Dave]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226506#Comment_226506</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226506#Comment_226506</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:11:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>db8000</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Mikeee5</cite>I've been to see her family and they are not very happy that there mother has been dooped into providing a statement!!! They are going to help her withdraw the statement formally.<br /><br />Unbelievable people we are dealing with here. They have even mentioned in their statements that I quoted the Clean Air Act when they self installed the none Defra exempt boiler. I would have thought that would be a blatant breach of the CAA in a smoke control area, especially when they were burning painted wood, which they have admitted to in their statements!!!<br /><br />Mikeee5</blockquote><br /><br />You have to tell your solicitor.  Her witness statement will stand otherwise.  The judge will know no better.<br /><br />It doesn't sound like it's appropriate to summons her to court to cross-examine her (you can in fact summons opponent's witnesses) but you must do something, not just rely on the family to write something.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226507#Comment_226507</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226507#Comment_226507</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:19:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>db8000</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: djh</cite><blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Mikeee5</cite>I'm just finalising my response to the defendants statements and there are that many lies in them it's unreal. It looks like they are trying to assassinate mine and my wife's characters and trying to make out we are the bad guys in all this. As mentioned previously, I've never been to court before and I'm not sure how it will be seen by the judge if I were to point out the "untruths" .</blockquote><br /><br />What I'd like to say is: "Don't call people liars - don't refer to their statements at all. But do make a clear statement of the truth of whatever facts it is that are stated wrongly." But without seeing all the documents, I can't be absolutely sure that's the right advice..</blockquote><br /><br />Indeed.  You can quite happily point out that you disagree with their version of the events.  The judge will make a finding as to who he/she believes.<br /><br />Besides, if witness statements are in, there is not usually any further opportunity to address this before trial.<br /><br />Do you have a barrister for the trial?  A half decent barrister will easily expose the issues in their statement in cross-examination and can also deal with the statement of the lady down the road.<br /><br />Dave]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226582#Comment_226582</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226582#Comment_226582</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2015 12:11:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello Dave. Thank you for jumping in. My solicitor is being funded by my home insurance and he has said that it could be a trainee solicitor or the barrister that works for my insurers that attends court. I'm hoping it's the barrister as he has been involved with the case for a couple of years and is well versed on the events. It was the barrister that arranged the particulars of claim and I thought he had been very thorough with the facts. I have read through the witness stamements and I can see several areas where they have tripped themselves up. <br /><br />I found out recently that My neighbours have paid the expert witness to comment on some videos that they have taken of the chimney smoking and answer some questions on his report. Perhaps he isn't allowed to attend court because he has now done work for both parties!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226609#Comment_226609</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226609#Comment_226609</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 19:03:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[What would happen if my neighbours produced documentation in court that had not been disclosed? Would it get kicked out?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226613#Comment_226613</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226613#Comment_226613</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 19:39:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>longjohn2</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi mikeee5 <br />I thought all evidence was disclosed to the other party (and the court) before the case is heard. I would be inclined to ask your legal advisor. I think it would be unfair if the party sprung evidence on the day of the case. You would surely have a right to reply. The judge would most likely adjourn the case pending exchanging further evidence? Why would the other party not disclose all documents?<br />LJ2]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Smoke Nuisance â€“ is wood wood?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226616#Comment_226616</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9305&amp;Focus=226616#Comment_226616</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:24:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Mikeee5</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The expert witness has done some work for my neighbours and they haven't disclosed it. Would have thought they would want to rely on his opinions in court.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>