Any suggested strategies for making sure our kitchen extract hood is super powerful by also super quiet? (we will also have MVHR)

I'm removing the standard extractor when I build a 'false' chimney breast around our 1100mm-wide extractor hood so that I can fit an inline Manrose extractor in an insulated chamber (accessible for maintenance) to reduce the noise and perhaps convince the wife that it needs to be used...

http://www.manrose.com/specifications/man50inlinecent.pdf

(And as owlman posted a few seconds before me... retaining the filters in the extractor hood!)

And found these in the 'new products' section whilst I was looking to post the link...

http://www.manrose.com/specifications/flatchannelacousticdamper.pdf

http://www.manrose.com/specifications/fireairvalves.pdf

This is especially true for MVHR ducting but can also important for extractors.
To have maximum extraction and minimun noise it is important to

1) Use wide ducting. This reduces flow velocity (so less noise from ductwork) and reduces back pressure on the fan (so fan has to work less hard and makes less noise). Fitting a reducer and using narrow tubing can push noise levels up considerably and reduces effectiveness.

2) Use rigid smooth bore ducting (plastic is good). Use as few bends as possible and join duct sections with external joints (not slightly narrower pipe fitted inside). If you must use flexible ducting anywhere keep it as short as possible and don't reduce size at flexible ducting. The zig-zag internal surface of flexible ducting increases flow resistance and turbulence.

3) Use as few bends in ductwork as possible.

4) Keep filters clean.

We recently re-did our kitchen extractor. The original installer refused to do it properly (when asked to have another go with wider pipe because it was too noisy) saying it would make no difference because it's just meant to be that noisy. You could not have a conversation in the kitchen when it was operating.
When we opened it up we found a 200->100mm reducer and 100mm flexible ducting so we replaced it with 200mm rigid plastic ducting and the exact same extractor is now lovely and quiet. On lowest setting it seems pretty silent and even on max it is still very easy to talk over.
The extractor did come with the 100mm reducer in the box however the small print in the installation did say to stock with 200mm pipe for lowest noise and max efficiency.

Oh and less important for cooker extractor perhaps but in the case of MVHR very long pipe runs can cause resonance that greatly amplifies and selectively filters any noise in the system. It can be a good idea to check for this before sealing everything up and comitting to final positions and vent styles. We've got two almost idential and very simple MVHR installs here (both Xcell 270BP) but the first one we did has one long (20m) straight pipe run to the internal outlet duct. It is quite noisy at that outlet although it is well away from the MVHR unit. The second install has all very short ducts (all < 1m) and is silent.

As above, but you did ask.. trepol from Denmark, super powerful, as good as silent. you can smoke a cigarette near it and watch it suck it in! Probably not the cheapest hood in the world!

'Super powerful'? Assuming that means enormous airflow rate, where's the air coming from in an airtight building (can't rely on any normal MHRV system to supply that much) and is the heat being recovered from that airflow?

Instead of 'super powerful', cd be looking at 'super efficient' instead, meaning ways (not yet commercially developed) to capture smells, steam, fat vapour, much closer to source e.g plumbed-in to the pan lids, or mini hoods flexibly positioned close above ea pan. Air speed is necessary - must exceed the speed of backward-propagation of volatile substances driven by partial vapour pressure, not bulk-air movement. Small 'intake aperture' (i.e. frontal area between pan rim and mini-hood rim) gives smaller volume flow for given air velocity, capturing same amount of heat, hence the outgoing airflow is smaller volume but hotter, hence easier/more efficient to capture heat from.

Better still, go veggie, stop frying, get civilised instead of vaporising quantities of stink and grease all the time.

Is 'recirculating' what the guys are discussing above? Don't think so - 'greenies' to a man, they're talking about powerful extract!

Posted By: RobinBthen you could send this gale out into a room for drying the washing

Except won't it be quite humid having sucked up all the steam from the cooking?

Lo-energy cooking, incl dealing with fumes and waste heat, is the last big hurdle to be tackled in domestic energy use (even more so for commercial cooking). Great, untapped potential, and stuff someone can sell too!

However, like lo-energy lighting, it will only save energy in summer, because the reduced 'incidental gains' contribution to winter space heating will have to be supplied instead by the space-heating system.

In a Passihaus, that means the 'backup' heating system, already deprived of 'incidental gains' from lighting (thanks to LEDs) and less consumptive appliances and electronics, will become near-full-time, unless serious year-round (incl Dec/Jan) solar space-heating is designed-in.