Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



green Building Press Book offers
Free UK delivery on all our books...

 Ecohouse 2 by Sue Roaf
Just £26.98

Ecohouse 2 by Sue Roaf


 Building With Cob
Just £25.00

building with cob


More great priced ecobuilding books here





Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Hi,
    I'm about to give a deposit to a supplier to install a GSHP in my property and wanted to double check with people more knowledgeable than myself that I am doing the right thing.

    My house in a very inaccessible, if beautiful, location on the beach 1/2 mile down a track cut into the cliffs that is accessible only by a good 4x4. Consequently oil deliveries are out of the question (I wouldn't anyway) and I am off the gas grid. I currently heat (if you can call it that) the house by coal fired Rayburn but it is filthy, inconvenient and killing the planet (last year I burnt 2 tons of coal!)

    I have considered a wood fired boiler but people who have come to advise have suggested that i would need about 10-12 tons of wood a year to heat a house of my size (large detached 4 bedroom). The green credentials of wood stack up but if I'm honest I want to get away from the hassle of solid fuel and at some point I'd like to rent the house out for a couple of years and see the world and wouldn't necessarily trust anyone else with lighting and maintaining it. I also don't have the space to stack 12+ tons at my house and I wouldn't get deliveries where I am am so I'd have to collect it and bring it down a ton or so at a time. All this has made me discount wood as an option.

    I've looked in to waste oil boilers which is a fairly attractive option (I currently run my car on waste oil so am familiar with it) but again I'm not sure I'd trust anyone else with it and I'd end up spending a lot of my time collecting and processing the oil (and probably fiddling with the boiler as well). The domestic waste oil boilers I've seen seem to be an adaption kit fitted to a conventional oil boiler and are something which you fit yourself.

    All this has lead me to the conclusion that a GSHP is the way to go, unless someone can convince me otherwise...?

    Help, advice or general cogitations welcomed!

    PS My house is a large stone built detached house, I will be insulating the floors and external walls with 6" celotex or equivalent and am planning to have woodburner as a space heater in the main living area with the GSHP giving background heat in the winter and our DHW
  2.  
    '' I will be insulating the floors and external walls with 6" celotex or equivalent ''.

    Internally or externally? If internal, notwithstanding that you'll get a very satisfactory U value, be very very very careful about the interstitial condensation risk. Your ext walls will be very cold and dependent on the perfomance of the vapour Control Layer (VCL). Can you do solar water heating too?
    • CommentAuthorBeau
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012
     
    If you burned 2 tonnes of coal should only need 4-5 tonnes of wood if this site is to believed. http://www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk/portal/page?_pageid=75,20041&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL

    We use a GSHP in combination with a wood burning stove and it works well in a well insulated building.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012
     
    For sure you should insulate first, I would rather see external wall insulation, then assess the heat loss then design the heating system if needed.

    It pains me to raise this but you could consider wood pellets, GSHP is a good option though.

    With 6" of cellotex I cant see you needing much of a heating system and so please do the calcs first, an ashp might do it costing less than a grand.
  3.  
    With Tony, partic an air-to-air HP.

    Do the air-tightness stuff before you do the insulation. Please!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012
     
    SSHP (sea-source heat pump)? There's one in use on the south coast of Ireland, IIRC.
  4.  
    Hi, thanks all for your comments.

    Ed- SSHP has been considered (as has water source as we are by a river) but as we don't actually own the land between us and sea or river we have discounted it. We might just about get permission to lay the pipes but there is no way I would get permission to build the filter stations or whatever (we are in an area of special scientific interest and in an area of outstanding natural beauty and in a conservation area, all this= no new building anywhere!)

    Nick. Please advise about air tightness!! Re condensation my plan is this: to foam and tape all joints in the celotex so that it cannot come into the house itself. As the external walls have been lime rendered the condensation will then exit the house in an orderly fashion through the lime render. I am also hoping that with so much insulation condensation will be at a minimum as there will not be any warm air meeting cold air as all the warm air will stay the right side of the insulation so to speak. Solar not an option as we loose our sun too early in the day when it passes over the headland that we are tucked in behind.

    Beau- thanks for the link but I am not convinced. I installed a 'Finnoven' (masonry stove batch boiler type thing) in a friends house which is very well insulated, much more compact than mine and much smaller and last year they burnt getting on for 5 tons of wood. I'm fairly sure I would burn at least twice that. I'd be interested to hear how much your gshp costs to run each year though and what your set up is if you wouldn't mind sharing it.

    Thanks all for your continued views- this is really helpful stuff.
  5.  
    Thanks Beau- is the weather compenstion device worth having? Does it make the system more efficient?

    Is your HP an inverter model? I have been advised to have a 5-11kw variable output inverter heat pump. The idea I beleive is that it runs more or less constantly and varies its output depending on the temperatures required as opposed to fixed output HPs which vary their output by switching on and off all the time. Do you know much about this?
    Bob
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012
     
    Where about in the country are you? Your local climate can make a large difference to energy use (see the 'Heating On' thread). Would make a difference to the heating system too, and the insulation/condensation issue.
    Have you calculated the room by room heat losses?
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2012 edited
     
    Posted By: rangichangisamSSHP...there is no way I would get permission to build the filter stations or whatever...

    Ok, probably not practical in your case but worth mentioning. For the record, though, the usual scheme is to just put a loop of pipe in the pond/lake/river/sea and run the HP input fluid through that, rather than take external water into the HP. Therefore no filters. Apart from avoiding jelly fish, etc, in the HP it also allows the use of antifreeze; remember that the output of the heat pump will be cooler than the source water.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2012
     
    Weather compensation is most useful if your building is only moderately heat-tight and radiators or UFH moderately specced. It just raises the output flow temperature (at the cost of efficiency so more power-in required) when it is colder weather... to compensate for the increased heat leakage caused by the bigger temperature difference inside to out.

    If your heat delivery system (radiators or UFH, or fan coils or whatever) are effective enough at low temperatures then you don't really need weather compensation. But if for example you keep existing UFH setup when you replace a boiler with a GSHP then weather compensation can be useful to let you keep efficiency up when you don't need the full heat pump output.

    I think your ideas/principles are fairly sound but you will need to take a very close look at ventilation, moisture sources, practical details (damp proofing, corners, chimneys, wall plates etc) to get an idea just how good a job can be done for air tightness and insulation and where trouble may come from. It may be worth kicking that around for a few months rather than rushing into it.

    Regarding the GSHP... roughly what sort of power level and what kind of ground loop (slinky(s) or borehole(s))were you thinking and what have you got outside to install them in?
  6.  
    Thanks all,

    Steamy Tea- I am on the Gower Peninsular, South Wales. Heat Loss has been calculated as a whole I beleive (the company installing the sytem calculated it. What would be the implications of doing calcs room by room?

    Sprocket- The power level is 5-11kw and I'm having a vertical 140m borehole

    Keep the ideas coming!
    Bob
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2012 edited
     
    Posted By: rangichangisamWhat would be the implications of doing calcs room by room?

    Has to be done that way for the MCS/RHI and any installer should show you the calculations.
    Main reason is to show that other things, like solar gain, window size, infiltration can save you more than you can generate locally.
    Keep meaning to do it for my place :shamed:
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2012
     
    5-11kw is really quite modest/decent for a 4 bed house. Was that assuming your proposed 6" PUR foam insulation and air tightness? ie. did they take the current spec PLUS assumptions about your improvements as the target they were intending to heat? Not necessarily a sign of evil intent but of course it gives your GSHP spec/installer a way-out if they underdeliver (can blame your improvements as under spec). Just something to think about. You may want to get fairly sure of what you can do for air-tightness and insulation.

    Since you say you will insulate the floors, does this mean you will be putting in new UFH and screed? If so then I would suggest you budget for UFH pipes on 100mm centres (ie. very dense pipes). It will let you run the GSHP flow temp lower so you get better efficiency. Cost will go up a bit because more pipe needed but don't let anyone tell you you can get away with less IMHO.

    The standard installer GSHP system would include a fair sized buffer tank (separate from your DHW water tank) and zoned heating. Is that what you are looking at? Do you have space for that extra tank? It is possible to do away with the buffer but it needs careful thinking about (and preferably elimination of) the heating zones. Fairly easy on a new small-ish eco-build but practical issues or perceived risk means most installers insist on the buffer tank. However the setup is much simpler without the buffer and zones if (and only if) your building's outer envelope is up to it (ie. just heat the whole house all the time).

    If you are considering a secondary heat source (ie. in addition to the GSHP) then the buffer tank is a no-brainer so that consideration goes away.

    Regarding the borehole, can you get a fixed price for the drilling? Unexpected geology (like we found lots of here) can risk pushing the price up considerably so good to eliminate that risk if you can.

    Drilling is not cheap. I would expect a 150m borehole to be a significant proportion of the install costs.

    Regarding the GSHP, can I ask what manufacturer/model you were recommended? Did you get a choice?
    Most GSHP contain supplementary electrical heaters. It is common practice to specify a GSHP to provide a proportion (i.e.. less than 100%) of the expected peak thermal load and let the electrical heaters pick up the shortfall on the coldest days. If the heat pump itself is adequately sized then the electrical heaters will rarely (if ever) kick in. But if undersized you can end up running some significant proportion of your winter load on electrical heating (ie. very bad). Again, not necessarily a sign of evil intent but you should be aware of it.

    If you achieve reasonable air tightness you will need to be thinking about ventilation too.
  7.  
    Hi Sprocket- thank you for your extended comments.

    I think with a variable output HP I will not need a buffer tank, as I understand it buffer tanks are there too fill the lag in between the call for heat, the Hp turning on and the delivering heat. Variable output models I think are able to respond more quickly and so don need require a buffer. (I am new to this so please correct me anyone if I am wrong) But yes also having a secondary space heating system in place.

    I will check out the make and model etc- to be honest I have been guided by the supplier to date and haven't asked too many questions, perhaps I should. I don't think they have anything but good intentions but as it is my money I should make my own decisions.

    What sort of unexpected geology problems did you encounter? I am aware of the problem of underground caves etc but nothing else.

    Yes, just thinking about ventilation and have just heard about MVHR systems- anyone know much about these, what they involve etc?
    • CommentAuthorBeau
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2012 edited
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: rangichangisam</cite>Thanks Beau- is the weather compenstion device worth having? Does it make the system more efficient?

    Is your HP an inverter model? I have been advised to have a 5-11kw variable output inverter heat pump. The idea I beleive is that it runs more or less constantly and varies its output depending on the temperatures required as opposed to fixed output HPs which vary their output by switching on and off all the time. Do you know much about this?
    Bob</blockquote>

    Weather compensation was the recommended way for an efficient system when we were shopping around (about 6-7 years ago). Does it make it more efficient? In all honesty I don't know but it does keep the house at a steady temperature once you get it set up right. I think it does allow you to use a small unit as it does not get caught out with sudden changes in internal temperature but I am no expert at this.
    The way it works on our GSHP is the system is managed off the outside temperature and not the inside. You have what is termed a heat curve which you will need to adjust to your house. This is how much the heat pump has to react to the changes in external temperature. For example if your house is badly insulated and the temperature outside starts dropping you will need a high curve which means the heat pump will have to raise the heating circuit temperature dramatically to keep your house at a steady temperature. Inversely if your house is well insulated you will need a low curve so now when the outside temperature starts dropping the heating circuit temperature will not need to raise much to keep the house at steady temperature. To adjust how warm you want your house you can just turn the balanced curve up or down. I do not know if a heat curve is an industry standard measure or if specific to each manufacturer but our controller is a Rego 637 and our heat curve is 1.6. I was told by our GSHP suppliers this was very good but then they would say wouldn't they :bigsmile:

    I hope that made sense:confused:

    Our GSHP is of the fixed output variety and I am afraid I know nothing about the variable output type.
    • CommentAuthorBeau
    • CommentTimeSep 1st 2012 edited
     
    Sproket said "5-11kw is really quite modest/decent for a 4 bed house"

    Our house is not as well insulated as rangichangisam plans and our GSHP is only a 6Kw unit (1.7 kw consumption when running) and even before we had a wood burning stove it had no problem keeping us warm in the depths of winter but it obviously depends on how large the house is.
  8.  
    Thanks all for your comments- I feel like I am probably making quite a sensible move after all. Splashing out vaste amounts of money on heating systems does funny things to your nerves !:wink:
    • CommentAuthormike7
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012
     
    Posted By: rangichangisam Splashing out vaste amounts of money on heating systems does funny things to your nerves !:wink:" alt=":wink:" src="http:///forum114/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/wink.gif" >


    Hi Bob - just a last ditch call to tout the case for air to air HP. Your location seems especially suitable as being close to the sea and thus more temperate than average even for the UK.... and the cost would be way less.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012
     
    Posted By: mike7sea and thus more temperate than average even for the UK

    Has more heat, which is just another word for energy, at a higher mean temperature. I knew what you meant :wink:
    May be a problem with mist, not seen any evidence, just guessing. Does anyone know anything about icing of ASHPs?
  9.  
    What about salt?
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012 edited
     
    > as I understand it buffer tanks are there too fill the lag in between the call for heat,
    > the Hp turning on and the delivering heat

    A HP will atually deliver heat within seconds of being turned on. Up to full power within the first minute too. The main reason for a buffer tank is to be able to deliver small amounts of heat. A normal heat pump likes to deliver full power and it does not like to be turned on and off at short intervals. Aside from wear to the heat pump parts the start current for the big 3-phase motor is not something you really want happening a lot either. Zoned heating can require a heat pump if the zones are small or may all go off. Driving radiators or fan coils rather than UFH may also require a buffer because of the very low load as air approaches temperature.

    If you genuinely can keep the heat pump running even at low loads then no buffer should be needed. I guess that's the 5-11kw range you mentioned? I wonder if 5kW will be low enough.

    I'm not familiar with inverter heat pumps. I'm interested to know more about it though. I assume the "inverter" part is a voltage converter to drive the main compressor motor at variable speeds. Motor driving tech has come a long way because of recent development for electric vehicles etc (higher voltages, latest high power low loss semiconductors, neodymium permanent magnet motors, fancy micros to control it etc). I'll Google it for more info of course but does anyone here have any direct experience with these heat pumps vs the regular type?
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012
     
    > Weather compensation was the recommended way for an efficient system when we were
    > shopping around (about 6-7 years ago). Does it make it more efficient?

    No, not more efficient. Slightly less efficient on cold days, depending on how steep the curve is.
    But what it does do is boost your UFH or radiators by running at a higher temperature (hence less efficient) when it is really cold so you can

    a) have a chance of heating even a leaky house on a very cold day.
    b) heat it up more quickly (otherwise you might have to wait many hours for it to come up to temperature)
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012
     
    Posted By: Sprocket5-11kw is really quite modest/decent for a 4 bed house.


    Depends if that's input or output. As output is sounds a bit mean. If you're planning to insulate and increase airtightness then the GSHP people need to know the house as it will be rather than as it is now to spec an appropriate size system.

    ASHP do ice up which is why they don't work as well in our damp cold weather as in colder but drier countries. Most have a de-icing system which obviously reduces efficiency. That said we are very happy with ours but if it seriously misty/foggy a lot of the time the GSHP may be better.
  10.  
    Rangichangisam,

    Sorry for delay in replying to this:

    ''Nick. Please advise about air tightness!! Re condensation my plan is this: to foam and tape all joints in the celotex so that it cannot come into the house itself. As the external walls have been lime rendered the condensation will then exit the house in an orderly fashion through the lime render. I am also hoping that with so much insulation condensation will be at a minimum as there will not be any warm air meeting cold air as all the warm air will stay the right side of the insulation so to speak.''

    Old houses tend to leak air like sieves. What you want to do as far as possible is to minimise *unintentional* ventilation - draughts, even if you cannot feel them (they may be going on behind the scenes - within layers of insulation, behind 'dot'-and-dab' plasterboard etc etc) and set a strategy for intentional ventilation, to minimise condensation wheile minimising heat-loss via air. Particularly in rubble-filled stone walls tere can be massive air-movement *within* the walls. if Beatrix Potter's mice can walk upstairs inside the walls then air can move there! I know of stone houses (both uninsulated and internally insulated) where howling gales come out of the plug sockets.

    Re 150mm insulation being OK, have a read of (architect) Joseph Little's series 'Breaking the Mould' in Construction Ireland - a Google will find it. I try not to agree blindly, but tere are those who suggest that you cannot completely safely insulate a solid wall to a U value better than 0.5W/m2K without a condensation risk. *Part* of the problem, in my view, is that no-one ever gets a VCL 100% tight, however hard they try. Any insulation manuf will do a condensation risk analysis for you (remember we are talking *interstitial* condensation (on the old surface of the wall behind the ins - sorry if I am teaching to suck eggs, but you asked!) A will assume that the VCL is 100% - it probably won't be, and if it is when you do the work it prob won't be when the subbies have finished.

    I know little of WUFI (more 'dynamic' CRA software) but I gather it is much more accurate and can give you a better idea of the real risks. In the end we are all trying to avoid shortening the life of buildings by trying to do the right (insulation) thing. Oh, and don't get me wrong, if we can safely do 0.15-0.2 u values with IWI I will be rushing to do them.

    Nick

    Edit: Sorry, my text above assumes you have stone walls. I am getting mixed up between your thread and the listed (stone) bldg thread!
  11.  
    Hi,
    Mike 7- I am at the bottom of a fairly cold valley so whilst I am right by the sea I am also affected by the valley. The cold air tends to sink to the bottom of the valley and hang around way after the air at the top of the valley has warmed up. We also get quite a lot of sea mist.

    Nick- thanks for your advice, I'll google the breaking the mould stuff and try and get my head around it. I do have stone walls with rubble infill so your points re air tightness were very relevant, thank you very much.

    Bob
  12.  
    Bob,

    Assuming an existing U value of around 1.8 for your walls, 150mm celotex (assuming a lambda value of about 0.022) should give you under 0.14W/m2K, unadjusted for thermal bridging. Nice, if it'll work without condens'n/mould risk.

    Nick
  13.  
    Hi, yeah I'd calculated the U-value at about that too. Anyone got any tips on minimising thermal bridging when fixing celotex to external walls? My plan was to use spray adhesive and then fix the plasterboard to the wall through the insulation with a few plastic insulation fixings like these:

    http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Kingspan-Marmox-Insulation-Anchor-Cob-Plug-Fixing-Dowels-60-90-or-110mm-/150803504677?pt=UK_DIY_Material_Nails_Fixing_MJ&var=&hash=item231c96de25

    As I will be lime plastering the heads will be covered by a thick layer of plaster anyway.

    Maybe i should start a new thread on this? Thoughts welcomed anyway
    Bob
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2012
     
    It is not so much the fixings that are the problem, plastic ones already being essential but what to where there are internal walls and floors that are the big problem areas. Reveals and penetrations come next
  14.  
    Bob,

    What's the state of the walls now? Are they plastered (and if so, ? with old lime plaster?) or are they stripped off? If they are stripped off, then I am afraid you need to do a parging coat (rough air-tightness layer) of lime render to air-seal (but not vapour seal) the walls before you insulate. get that trowel out!

    Nick
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press