Home  5  Books  5  Magazines  5  News  5  GreenPro  5  HelpDesk  5  Your Cart  5  Register  5  Green Living Forum
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories

This month's favourite choices





Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012
     
    Hi all. An easy one for many of you I'm sure but I find this whole interstitial condensation thing confusing...

    I want to insulate the tiled part of the bay between our grnd & 1st floor windows (typical 30s house). I took some tiles off to investigate and it seems to be just concrete tiles hung on battens, on a 3x2" studwork timber frame, plus plasterboard.

    Should the construction be like a warm roof - ie celotex or similar between the studs, and if so can I only add 25mm of insulation to leave the outer 50mm free of insulation for ventilation of the timbers? Do I REALLY need to leave this gap?

    Are there any better ways of doing this? I wondered about adding a further 25mm on the outside of the studwork (I've been advised that the outer edge is more sensible than inside), or maybe more if I extended the cill, but wouldn't that prevent these timbers being ventilated. In this respect it seems like loss of airflow/ventilation vs greater scope for interstitial condensation. Confusing!

    I could also add studwork on the inside, or add insulated plasterboard (and foil?).

    I apologise that this might be a bit 'back to basics' for this forum, but I've had lots of conflicting advice. Oh, and the other thing to add is that we already have a condensation/mould problem at the head of the window (which I hope to resolve by adding better insulation in roof above), so don't want to do anything that could make this worse (eg could a vapour barrier to bay do so?)

    Any advice appreciated.
    Cheers
      P1020006.JPG
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 15th 2012
     
    I could only add 1 pic at a time!
      P1020007.JPG
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     
    Probably the joists let cold wind in under the floor, fully foll the void, may mean all coverings off one side or the other, thermally line inside, make sure you are airtight from under the floor to outside.

    Done this job lots of times, amazes me that there is never any insulation in there.
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     
    Cheers Tony
    Fortunately it's on the lee (north) side of the house, but yep, in a northerly with sanded/polished floorboards (no carpet) then there is a slight draught! The joists run across the house though (which may explain why it's not too bad).

    Plan is to take all tiles off from the outside - means I can't add an internal vapour barrier (unless in combination with an extra thermal lining on the inside which I'll consider) but less messy.

    "make sure you are airtight from under the floor to outside" - presumably I need to try to somehow wrap the outer level breather membrane down and try to link it with the plasterboard of the ceiling below?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     
    or to the walls and the window frames, do you have cavity walls, filled?
  1.  
    Take off the tiles, sprayfoam the cavity, paying attention to seal where the joists are, reapply the tiles. Job done. Warm and airtight.

    You're welcome ;)

    Paul in Montreal
  2.  
    Posted By: smokeyjonShould the construction be like a warm roof - ie celotex or similar between the studs, and if so can I only add 25mm of insulation to leave the outer 50mm free of insulation for ventilation of the timbers? Do I REALLY need to leave this gap?

    Are there any better ways of doing this? I wondered about adding a further 25mm on the outside of the studwork (I've been advised that the outer edge is more sensible than inside), or maybe more if I extended the cill, but wouldn't that prevent these timbers being ventilated. In this respect it seems like loss of airflow/ventilation vs greater scope for interstitial condensation. Confusing!
    There are basically two ways to avoid condensation damage to timber:

    1. The warm roof approach: keep the timber warm so that there's no condensation. Put at least as much insulation outside the timbers as there is inside or between the timbers.

    2. The cold roof approach: ventilate cold timbers so that any condensation is rapidly dissipated. Put all insulation inside or between the timbers & ensure good air flow over their outer face.

    I don't think you've got enough room for the warm roof approach without new sills & soffits. The first 50-60mm of insulation makes the most difference & 15mm ventilation gap should be sufficient given the additional 25mm batten space & the vapour open covering. So I would fill the voids with 60mm rigid polyurethane insulation pushed tight against plasterboard & sealed to timbers with expanding polyurethane foam.

    David
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 16th 2012
     
    Thanks all
    tony - our house has been assessed several times by experts in this field, and the best conclusion reached is that either we have solid walls, or we have a 'finger cavity' (too tight to be filled using current methods). My feeling is that it's the latter but I have been unable to confirm (there is no exposed brickwork to review anywhere, and a review of the wall tops was inconclusive. I think the only way would be for me to remove one of the seemingly useless/blocked vents that you can see on the picture to see/feel inside). Hence I'm keen on EWI (but can't currently justify the cost).

    Paul - I've seen that spray insulation on t'internet (or are you just talking about the stuff in cans?). I presume it's a N American thing (I haven't heard much about it over here - except warmcell that is)? You have LARGE houses over there. My 4 sq m bay probably doesn't warrant the costs of getting the kit to my site! Thanks though ;-)

    David - That's a very helpful explanation thanks. I think what you are suggesting is what I was hoping someone would say (the easiest way for me to tackle it!) Do you think a breather membrane on the outer surface will prevent adequate airflow/condensate evaporation (is that what you meant about 'the vapour open covering') or do you think it'd still be OK?
  3.  
    Posted By: smokeyjonPaul - I've seen that spray insulation on t'internet (or are you just talking about the stuff in cans?). I presume it's a N American thing (I haven't heard much about it over here - except warmcell that is)? You have LARGE houses over there. My 4 sq m bay probably doesn't warrant the costs of getting the kit to my site! Thanks though ;-)


    Most of the foam is made by BASF I think! There's many companies here who will come and sprayfoam an area for you - they don't use cans of course. It's very effective. Warmcell is blown cellulose - we're lucky that we can rent the machines for that from the hardware store. I think foam would be better for your application though. Over here, we also have Icynene which is a water-blown flexible foam - I think there's installers in the UK too, but it's more expensive than the regular closed cell foam.

    Paul in Montreal.
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012
     
    Hi Paul
    There do seems to be plenty of UK installers - eg http://www.sprayfoaminsulation.co.uk/?gclid=COXuq8q5h7MCFe_MtAod5TsAvQ but I must say I'm not convinced for this application.

    I thought this extract from that website was entertaining too: 'Condensation problems are a common theme in our work,...' I suspect they mean that they can commonly cure it, but i'm sure I could create the opposite effect if it didn't do this right!

    I can buy celotex (rigid polyurethane board) at the merchants 2 mins walk round the corner so if I can do it that way I probably will. I'll give the spray foam more thought for our (unfelted) roof though!
  4.  
    ''I'll give the spray foam more thought for our (unfelted) roof though! ''

    Please include in your thoughts de-lamination of slates (if you have slates) and potential damage to timber. This use of spray-foam concerns me.
  5.  
    Posted By: smokeyjonDo you think a breather membrane on the outer surface will prevent adequate airflow/condensate evaporation (is that what you meant about 'the vapour open covering') or do you think it'd still be OK?
    The tiles have kept the water out for the last 80 years, so a breather membrane clearly isn't required. And, if you carefully seal rigid insulation to the timbers, the risk of thermal bypass is quite low.

    That said, a breather membrane can only help airtightness &, if properly fitted, can't do any harm. My concern would be that with only 15mm between the insulation & the rear face of the battens, ripples & folds in the membrane may obstruct ventilation (which is still required on the outside of the membrane).

    By vapour open covering I was referring to the tiles. They don't obstruct vapour movement & allow relatively high ventilation rates compared to render boards, weatherboarding, etc.

    David
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012
     
    Thanks both
    Nick - My starting point will be (already is) one of concern, and I will review all options (including, for the meantime taking the easiest of options - doing nothing!). I haven't heard of sprayfoam used like this very much, and I suspect that there are reasons for this. Tiles are concrete interlocking (and will be due for replacement sometime in the next 10-20yrs I reckon)

    David - thanks. I'll make sure a breather membrane is tightly fitted if I fit one at all. I haven't yet seen any evidence of water ingress so you're probably right. Woodworm, however, has clearly ingressed (the whole house was treated 10yrs ago and I intend to treat these timbers whilst the tiles are off), and I thought a breather membrane may help prevent future access by any other similar undesirables!!
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012
     
    Your tiles are plain tiles, woodworm cant digest dry wood so if they are or have been active then ther must be some wet about most likely condensation, Insulating is a very good idea.
    • CommentAuthorsmokeyjon
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2012
     
    tony - My description of the tiles was about the rooftiles (marley RD807051s), not these vertical, plain ones (it was a separate discussion!)

    I'll be interested to see how widespread the woodworm is when I get all tiles off. The whole house was treated in 1999 and the floorboards behind this bay were reinspected recently (under warranty) and confirmed not to be active. I'm hoping the infestation was historic, but it sounds like it could have been faciliated by dampness, possibly caused by condensation - good theory. Yet another reason to crack on with this then!
    • CommentAuthorbampton
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2012
     
    RE spray foam:

    I have just used Icynene on a listed building roof for various reasons. It is water based and open cell unlike the other stuff. It is easily available in the UK and I reckon they will come and do a smalll area like that.

    Cost is £16/m2 at that standard thickness. I wanted to fill a wedge shaped area and had to work out the costs for them though....but it was still based on £16/m2 and that included them driving up from the South coast to Oxfordshire with all the gear.

    It does not stick like the nasty closed cell other stuff - feels more like nice memory foam pillows. Gets sprayed on at 3mm thick and rapidly expands to around 100mm in a few seconds forming an airtight but vapour permeable seal. Very easily trimmed at the front to get the hang tiles back on. BBA Certificate in place and decent guarantee on the installation.

    I would use it again. The superior performance of celotex etc on paper soon becomes academic if you end up cutting it not quite square and leaving small gaps around the pieces you slot in. Not suggesting that you would - however I have spent a hell of a lot of time snagging poorly fitted insulation that was being cut by people who should know what they are doing. It's very unforgiving stuff when you need to do a tight fit retrofit.
    • CommentAuthormattwprice
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2012
     
    Hi Bampton, Do you mind if I ask a few questions? Are you concerned with any subsequent water penetration from external at all? If a tile or slate slips and you get water ingress how would that be dealt with as i would imagine it would totally soak the icynene before you would become aware of the failure? I note this type of insulation is often used directly onto tiles or slates or sarking boards and i have always thought it looks like a problem waiting to happen. As it is open cell does it breathe? Reading some of the literature it would seem to suggest it forms an effective air barrier and require ventilation when the space is to be used as a room. Does this mean it is sufficent enough to allow the passage of water vapour but not moving air? Over what thicknesses is this still effective? Does it form a vapour barrier? Or would you if using this in a sarking situation fit a vapour barrier internally before boarding out in a loft conversion scenario. I note the K value is only 0.039 so worse than glass fibre and unliklely to give a decent 'U; Value when used in the usual thicknesses possible with most retrofit insulation to rafters of the sizes normally found in loft conversions etc.
    •  
      CommentAuthorikimiki
    • CommentTimeOct 29th 2012 edited
     
    We have the same configuration. I think the insulation also needs to be implemented below the ground-floor bay window as well.

    What have you concluded on?

    As I'm trying to determine in a related thread, it's doesn't seem to be absolutely clear whether expanding spray foams are compliant or non-compliant with UK Building Regs.
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2012
     
    Posted By: tonywoodworm cant digest dry wood


    I don't think they need it to be really damp though - I've seen a lot of apparently dry furniture riddled with live woodworm.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeOct 30th 2012
     
    me too I think they like the polish and shellac and definitely the wood glue, but I have never see woodworm in dry structural timbers in houses.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press