Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2007
     
    My son is in his second year as an apprentice electrician, all of his work is within London. He knows what I do for a living and can't understand why it is so difficult to cut CO2 emissions. Travelling home late at night he is amazed by the amount of lights left on in offices in London, he asks why doesn't the government tell them to switch them off and if they don't fine them?
    Perhaps we should go back to World War 2 with the Air Raid Wardens (ARPs) and go one step further, make waste of energy a criminal offence? But perhaps all the lights are left on in London to show the World what a super power we are?
    How can we preach to the emerging nations about energy conservation when we waste so much!
  1.  
    Good point Peter, I often wondeer about road lighting as well. Surely we could manage with less. There are after all many stretches of motorway without any lighting at all.
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2007
     
    Mike, certain levels of lighting are necessary, it's a sad old world that says that lighting means security, but it is a balance that needs to be addressed. That said who really benefits from leaving all the office lights on in London all night. I'm pretty sure London isn't alone.
    Who can we canvas to make these changes happen?
    • CommentAuthorchuckey
    • CommentTimeDec 15th 2007
     
    All office lights should be fed by PIR detectors, with desks having individual desk lights. This is what our building has, so when you work by yourself the main lights go out (unless you wander around). When you go of to the coffee machine they come on - brilliant (ly)
    Frank
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2007
     
    What point is there in leaving lights for security on the 5th floor? Or indeed on any floor?

    I like the idea of punishing wasters with fines or prison or the birch.
    • CommentAuthoralexc
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2007
     
    hi,

    I am not a fan of street lighting. No stars at night.

    If you drive the M27 at A3M junction the some good lighting ideas, much reduced lighting, still great visibility.

    As for security. Strange as it my seem, the surveys of crime I have seen, show that street lighting leads to a slight rise in crime.
    I have seen only a constant rise of extremely powerful, security lighting in countryside. To the point that going to the pub and back i have to carry a torch as my night vision is obliterated by the security lights. Thankfully it seems some have do realise its over the top and tone them down.

    and office blocks. name and shame them. buy the security staff night vision eyewear. Just turn them off.
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2007 edited
     
    In my experience with working on public open space, public realm, country parks etc most lighting/sight line clearance is about addressing the perception of security/threat (our concern was allways to ensure people felt safe enough to use our very expensive regeneration projects!) rather than in reducing the incidence of crime. I am not sure that there is a significant correlation between street lighting and crime in general (there are so many other potential factors) although at a very local scale lighting can certainly move anti social behaviour & potentially crime around a bit.

    Lighting is often cited as having a significant (negative) effect on wildlife (animals) in general. In fact other than in a few cases (turtles, some birds) there is little hard evidence to support this - even for bats for whome the evidence (mostly anecdotal or if 'scientific' with adequate comparison/replication as it is very hard to do!) is equivocal.

    Wildlife stuff for interest.

    S.
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2007 edited
     
    My original point was about office ligthing, not too worried about their security, but do agree with Skywalker that a bit of street lighting does make people more comfortable to be out at night, at least they will see the crime coming! I was in Alderney a couple of months ago, they don't even know what street lights are, mind you don't think they know what crime is! Great night sky.
    My real concern is all the wasted energy with ofice lighting, which I suspect is just the tip of the iceberg. Just how much is being wasted across the country, do they know what it is costing them? That's about the only thing that business worries about and perhaps government law, they are banning the incandescent bulb how about office lighting. I'm surprised local authorities haven't twigged to the earning potential, get the traffic wardens on overtime, performance related and I bet the lights will soon go out!
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeDec 19th 2007
     
    Thought I would take the bull by the horns, sent my annual email of to the energy minister, will let you know how I get on with switching off London's lights at night!
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeFeb 12th 2008
     
    Well he never got back to me so thought I'd try an alternative approach, have emailed the Governor of California on the basis that our Energy Minister follows his environmental policies (phasing out incandescent light bulbs). What's the chances of a response?
  2.  
    I'm in the lucky position of being north of Newbury in an area of outstanding natural beauty. Our village and the surrounding villages have no street lights. Everyone who is going to be out at night carries a torch, even visitors learn quickly that a torch helps them back to their car. We look up and see a blackish sky, but we can easily see the yellow glow of Newbury, Reading etc. And your right, driving around the towns you see offices, shops and even houses leaving on lights when they are not in. It would be very interesting to see if one of the smaller towns such as Newbury could enforce or persuade local businesses to turn the lights off at night. Perhaps an incentive around the business rates would interest them? It would also be very interesting to see if people could survive again with few or no street lights on a night. Is safety really the concern or just fear of the dark?
    • CommentAuthorIan Ashton
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    Not sure if this is correct, but I am lead to beleive that a lot of street lighting, and more specifically the motorways, is to take the spare capacity of electricity produced at night. You cant just switch power stations on and off.

    ?????

    As for offices, I used to work in a PIR switched office, and if you fell asleep at your desk, the lights turned off after about 30 mins so not to wake you!
    • CommentAuthorTheDoctor
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    yup - we do zoned PIR offices as standard now.

    if you sit still for too long you do have to wave your arms about!

    daylight control automatically turns off all perimeter lighting when it is light outside, and controls the depth of perimeter lighting depending on sunshine / overcast etc.

    no big banks of switches anymore.
    • CommentAuthorTheDoctor
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    i think that miles and miles and miles of motorway lighting should be de-commissioned. junctions and roundabouts - maybe, but miles of deceptively flat, straight and un-impeding road? give me a break! At least one third of street lighting in built up areas should be de-commissioned, and that that remains should be better regulated so that whilst lighting is retained in important areas, it can have varying levels for different periods of the night.

    If power stations need to run 24 hours (yes i can understand that) then there should be a National programme to encourage off-peak usage with heat-store technology, and non-time essential activities happening through the night.

    we might need to keep the power stations running during the night, but we might not need so many.

    How tunable is Nuclear? As the base technology is as old as the hills (steam driven turbines) how modifiable is the fuel source?

    as someone who lives in the arse-end of nowhere, it does make me laugh / despair at the urban reliance on so much light. I know it is a crime deterrent in such densely populated areas, but it does seem over the top.

    Driving through an area of Leeds a year or two ago, at least half the lights were out, as a result of what looked like neglect by the Local Council. The resulting light level looked reasonable to me!
    Perhaps a shoddy maintenance regime is the way forward!!
    • CommentAuthorAds
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    Some of you may know of a clothing company called Howies. They recently opened a store in London and the terms of their lease insist that they leave lighting on overnight!!! Why, I don't know.
    • CommentAuthorcaliwag
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    Yeah, what about shop doors with overdoor heaters. I know the argument about shoppers not entering when doors are closed but surely it's time for very quick legislation about draught lobbies for shops or else...If every shop has closed doors, people will just choose the shop they want to enter...surely?
    I'm not going to change my bulbs until I see every shop door closed.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    We had a discussion about this before and someone actually said that it was more efficient to use these heaters!!!!

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=589

    I was nearly driven to despair by that thread.
    •  
      CommentAuthorecoworrier
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    Draught lobbies and or keeping the doors shut as a compulsory measure is a great idea.
    We should all email Ken Re;the lights he is not afraid of getting his hands dirty,
    goodbye Chelsea tractors, yay!:bigsmile:

    mayor@london.gov.uk
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeFeb 13th 2008
     
    Hi ecowarrior, thanks for the email address might just drop Ken a line. I wonder who will be the first to respond, might be worth opening a book, Ken, Arnie or Malcolm. Will Arnie live up to his catch phrase or will I have to include ET, "I'll be right back"!!!!
    Did anyone ever read the books by Henry Root, I wonder if he's still about and has discovered the joys of email? The older I get the more like him I get.
    • CommentAuthorTheDoctor
    • CommentTimeFeb 14th 2008
     
    i'm all for losing the chelsea tractors.
    i live in Scotland, over a mile off-road, with a very pot-holy track, steep sections etc.

    I have a normal family estate car - it perhaps needs an extra shock absorber or two every few years, but maintenance costs are very similar to living in uber-suburbia.

    I have lived there for 6 years and only been snowed in once, and then only for a day. The neighbour's Discovery got stuck that day too.

    I have a boat, tow it around, have a trailer, tow that around with building materials etc.

    i have never felt "hmm need a massive 4x4"


    wee dafties, as they say in Glasgow.
    • CommentAuthorhowdytom
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2008
     
    Peter A,
    henry root, fantastic I've still got a copy, would be great if he did an update:bigsmile:
    Tom
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2008
     
    I did write to the Mayor of London and got a reply! :--


    What about all these here office buildings with lights on but no body in them?

    WASTEFULL or what

    Dr A P Cowling

    Their reply:-

    Dear Dr Cowling,

    Thank you for your email to the Mayor referring to lights being kept on in buildings when offices are not being used. Please accept my reply on his behalf.

    As you may be aware the Greater London Authority is a strategic body and as a result the Mayor is unable to intervene directly in how businesses in London are run. This implies that although planning policies ask for as many energy saving measures as possible to be included in the design of new buildings, these measures cannot be applied retrospectively. If you wish to find out about energy measures in specific buildings I can only advise that you write to these directly, as this will also increase their awareness.

    The Mayor's Energy Strategy (http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/energy/index.jsp) commits London to reducing its emissions of carbon dioxide by 20 per cent, relative to the 1990 level by 2010 and the strategy recognises the need to reduce the amount of electricity used in wasted lighting. Similarly the London Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) (http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/environment/climate-change/ccap/index.jsp) launched by the Mayor in February 2007 draws attention to the fact that lighting is responsible for around a quarter of business sector carbon emissions and highlights the actions that businesses can take to address this.

    The GLA has recently been running a marketing campaign, 'DIY Planet Repairs' (http://www.london.gov.uk/diy/) to raise awareness of issues such as energy efficiency, and additionally, events such as the Lights Out London campaign, co-ordinated by Capital FM, in which we and many others participated, have highlighted the opportunities which exist to make savings on lighting, at home as well as in other sectors. For further information on this campaign, please visit Lights out London website at: http://www.lightsoutlondon.com/home.asp

    At City Hall we use energy efficient light bulbs where possible and in addition to using renewable energy from our solar panels, our electricity is on a green tariff. As an iconic London building along The Thames it is lit up at night, but the internal decorative lighting (which is energy efficient) goes off at 11.30pm. A movement sensor activates the general lighting in office areas and as it is patrolled by 24-hour security it will not be unusual to see these lights on.

    We recognise that if we are to solve the problem of global warming, then everyone will need to do their bit and it always an encouragement to hear of individual efforts, as mentioned in your case. We will continue to work to influence in this area and to raise awareness to the need for energy efficiency.

    Many thanks for your interest in London's environment and for taking time to contact the Mayor on this issue.

    Yours sincerely



    Anna Odur
    Assistant Correspondence Officer
    Policy and Partnerships





    I
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2008
     
    Hi Tony,
    Arnold got back to me, or rather one of his crew, same old clap trap, so I emailed him back something along the lines that a generic response what not what I was looking for and could they answer my specific question, no answer as yet! Nothing yet from our energy minister and I've chased him.
    Since whe does Ken worry about retrospective actions, ask all those people who have to drive old trucks into the low emission zone, or don't they count as businesses? Not that I don't agree with what he has done, he just needs to hit the big businesses in London, perhaps politically that's not a wise move for him?
    • CommentAuthorPammiet
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2008
     
    Dear All,
    unless I've misunderstood Ken's policy re: Chelsea Tractors, this has also impacted those who drive family cars too, as his policy is based on emissions rather than car type/engine size so penalizing some families trying v.hard to be eco-friendly in addition to the people Peter A mentions above.
    Pam
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2008
     
    Today is a good day to turn things off: http://www.e-day.org.uk/
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2008
     
    Biff, didn't look all that successful, that's why it's best to impose by law rather than expect voluntary actions to work. Hit business where it hurts them in the pocket, I suspect it's only then that savings will be seen, but I don't think that even Ken has the balls to upset the money men!
  3.  
    Well there were only three people who knew about the day, you, me and my goldfish. I think we already had everything switched off.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2008
     
    There is the optimistic view, which I do not support, that we are already doing all we can to save energy by always switching off when not in use.

    There for no savings on a special day would no biggie.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press