Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    Will 18 osb and plasterboard on the inside of the insulation do as a vapour barrier for a non domestic building? or should it get polythene on the inside too?
    • CommentAuthorhairydude
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    I've seen other threads on here using plasterboard and osb as separate layers in 'moisture breathable walls' so I'm guessing no. You could use duplex plasterboard but the joints and potential for scratching of the foil makes it more of a vapor check than a vapour barrier. These days I tend to use 50x50 battens then plasterboard inside a layer of taped polythene (or dedicated VCL membrane if budget allows) to create a service void - makes it much easier to avoid puncturing the VCL and the services trades can easily grasp where they can run the pipes and wiring.
  1.  
    Depends. What is the use of the space in the non -domestic building? and what are the other components of the thermal element?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013 edited
     
    You can't describe either OSB or pbd as any kind of vapour barrier - pbd has negligible resistance and OSB little-to-slight, just enough to be useful inboard in a 'breathing' construction.

    Just discovered that whereas 'generic' OSB is about 175mu, the Smartply brand which I specify because no-added-formaldehyde (now 'mainstream' availability) is much lower resistance, 50mu (dry cup) declining to 30mu (wet cup i.e. as water content goes up). One to watch - or to make good use of.

    By comparison pbd is about 8 mu (i.e. 8x as resistive as air), and a polythene vapour barrier about 50,000mu (before you put nails/staples thro it and fail to tape the joints impeccably and long-term durably).
  2.  
    Hi Tom, Can I ask where you got the source of the Mu values please?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013 edited
     
    WUFI data, and http://www.smartply.com/images/uploads/product_downloads/SmartPly_OSB3_Datasheet_2012_1.pdf

    I have permission to publish here a brilliant diagram, which extends the BuildDesk units-conversion diagram to include American 'imperial' units, incl converting between resist-ivity(-ance) and perme-ability(-ance). Will do asap. Not to mention transmi-ssivity(-tance)(-tion) and conduct-ivity(-ance) that also crop up, for water vapour movement.

    Mu (and Sd) values seems to be what we shd standardise on and get used to, because that's what WUFI and all the Europeans do, despite the ambiguity compared with e.g. Neil May's MNs/gm.

    BTW, the Glaser method is totally dead, or should be, despite still being enshrined in Bldg Regs.
  3.  
    Thanks.
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013 edited
     
    I think that it depends on the usage (swimming pool? Office? Grain storage shed?), and type (if any) of insulation you have outside of the studs.

    I believe a becoming-common US detail is XPS/EPS/PIR outside of the studs (providing circa 50% or more of the U value), plus low-resistivity insulation between studs (Warmcel / mineral fibre / wood fibre), and PB inside (no polythene VCL).

    http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-038-mind-the-gap-eh

    see the paragraph "Foam Sheathing Used With OSB Sheathing", and also the final detail in this:

    http://www.buildingscience.com/documents/insights/bsi-049-confusion-about-diffusion/#f07

    ... this works with both high-resistivity rigid insulation (e.g. foil PIR), or with med/low resistivity (e.g. non-foil PIR, or EPS) - just as long as it's reasonably hydrophobic.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    From out to in weatherboarding, battens, 50mm pir, 150 studs filled with rockwool batts, osb, (vcl), plasterboard.

    No wet areas inside building
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    Tony,

    The PIR (foil faced?) is your VCL in this build-up. I would not put any kind of additional VCL inboard of the PIR.
    Is the osb outward of the 150studs/rockwool layer?

    Cheers:smile:
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    I think the following would be a bit safer:

    weatherboarding
    battens
    75mm PIR
    150 studs with 100mm rockwool batts (tight to one side or the other)
    OSB
    plasterboard

    Any reason not to:

    weatherboarding
    battens
    75mm PIR
    OSB (air tight layer)
    150 studs with 100mm rockwool batts
    plasterboard

    ... then you end up with a 50mm service void behind the PB, and no problems with penetrating the airtight layer either before or after construction...

    As DarylP says - two vapour impermeable layers with wood in the middle sounds like storing up a problem for the future.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013
     
    I am unseen on vb part way through insulation layers, warm side for me and it doubles as the air barrier.
    • CommentAuthorTimber
    • CommentTimeJun 16th 2013 edited
     
    You lot need to consider the purpose of a vapour control layer (not barrier).

    The layer(s) on the warm side of the wall need 5x (ish) the vapour resistance of whatever is on the outside of the wall (excluding cladding if there is a vented cavity).

    Simple as that.

    OSB, plasterboard, paper can all be the 'vapour control layer' given the correct wall construction.

    How about

    Weatherboard
    battens
    breather membrane
    50+mm wood fibre board
    studs with mineral wool
    OSB (VCL and structural)
    battens for services (including more mineral wool)
    Plasterboard.

    Just need to consider air tightness by taping/sealing the OSB and perhaps taping the breather membrane to reduce the risk of wind washing.

    As for the Glaser method being dead (Tom) - I see it as a useful and simple tool for assessing risk.
  4.  
    What Timber said.

    The OSB is much better suited to the warm side of the insulation where it can remain at room temperature. This is the normal way of doing it in Germany where woodfibre is used on the outside of the studs.

    If a service cavity is required then add battens or, for a more soundproof/solid feeling wall, use a double layer of plasterboard.

    The insulation on the outside of the frame shouldn't be foil faced or you end up with a VCL on the cold side of the insulation. Better to use EPS/XPS or, ideally, woodfibre board.

    The reason the EPS/XPS solution is becoming standard in North America is because they also need to think about the summer case where warm humid weather will lead to water vapour being driven inwards towards air conditioned rooms. So it makes sense to use an insulation which has a reasonable vapour resistance to cover the summer case & is not affected by moisture in the winter case, which is also thick enough to avoid putting the frame in the winter condensation zone.

    David
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013
     
    Posted By: TimberThe layer(s) on the warm side of the wall need 5x (ish) the vapour resistance of whatever is on the outside of the wall (excluding cladding if there is a vented cavity).
    I can understand why that is said, it is like a valved that allows 1/5 of the flow in one direction and 5 times in the other.
    But are the material properties important, 5 times 1ppm is still only 5ppm, so absolute values should be important.

    Are the numbers big (as we say in statistics)
  5.  
    Posted By: Timber
    The layer(s) on the warm side of the wall need 5x (ish) the vapour resistance of whatever is on the outside of the wall.


    And:

    Posted By: davidfreeboroughBetter to use EPS/XPS or, ideally, woodfibre board.


    This is where it gets confusing! If the outside, over-stud insulation is e.g EPS, does that then mean that it's necessary to increase the vapour resistance inboard, so OSB no longer sufficient?

    If so, then the various suggestions that the between-stud, vapour-open insulations should be able to breathe (dry out) to the interior space would be at odds with this.

    The Building Science article above is unequivocal about keeping inboard impermeable plastics out of the picture:

    "With foam sheathing (of the appropriate thickness – R-value based on condensation control as noted above) the type of cavity insulation becomes irrelevant. Fiberglass batts, cellulose, low density foam, high density foam, ground up “blue jeans,” whatever, it no longer matters, they all work. Just don’t install an interior side plastic or foil or vinyl vapor barrier. A wall assembly has to dry in at least one direction and with that foam on the exterior the only practical drying direction is typically inwards. Remember that the assumption here is that the foam on the exterior is impermeable, which is not always the case – but once again we are being conservative."

    Can somebody please clear the fog for me?!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013
     
    My prelim investigations in WUFI about this 1:5 ratio suggest that it's not necessary, or subsidiary to other factors e.g. whether the inboard insulation is hygroscopic (Warmcel, wood fibre, sheep wool, other 'organics') or not (plastic/mineral fibre). But too early to say - and as always, don't take my word for it (unless paying me fee!) - satisfy yourself.

    And outboard, anything organic like woodfibre seems like a really bad idea if simply rendered, because every rain period produces extremely high water content (hopefully still vapour, not condensing to liquid) in the render and outermost part of the insulation, whether EPS or wood fibre.

    EPS and acrylic render may be none the worse for that, but I'd suggest that wood fibre shd only be used behind a rainscreen e.g. ventilated void behind the render. How they get away with lime render on wood fibre EWI I can't imagine.
  6.  
    Posted By: fostertomHow they get away with lime render on wood fibre EWI I can't imagine.


    Not to mention straw bales:cry:
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013
     
    But how to test straw bales, cob or other non-commercial materials for use in WUFI? Many different data characteristics have to be entered for ea material - not just lamda, density, and water vapour resistivity (if you're lucky) but several others. Tho manufacturers are apparently queuing up to get their products' data tested or accredited by Fraunhofer, it costs E3000 per material/variant to test, or E500 to verify, who's going to produce such data for non-commercial materials - which may vary hugely anyway?
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013 edited
     
    FWIW, there's a 380 page thesis at

    https://dspace.cc.tut.fi/dpub/bitstream/handle/123456789/188/vinha.pdf?sequence=1

    which sets out to explore how much vapour resistance is required. I haven't read it all yet.

    Sadly it's one of those PDFs that won't let me select and quote part of the abstract. :cry:
  7.  
    Posted By: fostertomBut how to test straw bales, cob or other non-commercial materials for use in WUFI?


    Yes - if all building materials had to be accredited/standardised before building control would consider them, it'd be a capitalist dream come true, and would largely preclude most experimental/locally-sourced/natural/intuitive/second-hand/decentralised/non-industrial/renewable building methods/materials/systems.

    Could this be where we're heading?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013
     
    All the timber studds in the walls are second hand and very dry, the over bosses wont accept a service void, I wanted one, I m glad to hear precedent for osb on warm side.

    Thinking from in to out P board, vcl, osb, 150 rockwool studds, pir, not sealed at joins :) battens f/e boarding.
  8.  
    Posted By: Henry Sears
    Posted By: Timber
    The layer(s) on the warm side of the wall need 5x (ish) the vapour resistance of whatever is on the outside of the wall.

    And:
    Posted By: davidfreeboroughBetter to use EPS/XPS or, ideally, woodfibre board.
    This is where it gets confusing! If the outside, over-stud insulation is e.g EPS, does that then mean that it's necessary to increase the vapour resistance inboard, so OSB no longer sufficient?
    The 5:1 vapour resistance rule is one way of avoiding condensation problems; if you like its the low vapour resistance "breathing wall" solution. However, this solution doesn't work if there are prolonged periods where the vapour diffusion gradient is reversed, as in the North American summer. Fortunately there are other solutions.

    An alternative approach is to use a relatively high vapour resistance sheathing insulation, ensure that it is tolerant of liquid water & make it thick enough to avoid the frame being in the winter condensation zone. The higher vapour resistance means there is less vapour to deal with & placing the winter condensation zone inside the insulation means the frame should stay dry. If it does get wet then it can dry towards the inside when conditions are right. This is made a lot easier if the OSB is on the inside.

    David
    • CommentAuthorTimber
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2013 edited
     
    Posted By: Henry Sears
    Posted By: Timber
    The layer(s) on the warm side of the wall need 5x (ish) the vapour resistance of whatever is on the outside of the wall.


    And:

    Posted By: davidfreeboroughBetter to use EPS/XPS or, ideally, woodfibre board.


    This is where it gets confusing! If the outside, over-stud insulation is e.g EPS, does that then mean that it's necessary to increase the vapour resistance inboard, so OSB no longer sufficient?



    Yes, the 'rule' still needs obeying or the 'books balancing' (whichever you prefer).

    We have talked about this before and a 1:1 wall will work given the correct (and limited) set of circumstances.

    Agreed about climates where there may be a reversal of the warm-inside cold-outside that we are used to in the UK. It is possible that it can happen in this country with directly applied cladding systems - e.g. render on insulation on frame, but it is rare and not well documented.

    Tony's proposed wall sort of looks fine - is the PIR foil faced? That will make a difference.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press