<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 05:49:56 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200280#Comment_200280</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200280#Comment_200280</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:27:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[""Panasonic has reportedly achieved a record 25.6% conversion efficiency for its HIT (Heterojunction with Intrinsic Thin layer) solar cell.<br /><br />The company say this beats their previous best of 24.7% efficiency for crystalline silicon-based solar cells of a "practical size", achieved in February 2013.""<br /><br />Made me wonder if I should be using conversion efficiency as a buying criteria, rather than cheapest price?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200281#Comment_200281</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200281#Comment_200281</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:32:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[That is only under optimum test conditions, Â£/W is the best gauge as it is cheap to put an extra panel in.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200285#Comment_200285</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200285#Comment_200285</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:51:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Triassic</cite>Made me wonder if I should be using conversion efficiency as a buying criteria, rather than cheapest price?</blockquote>Why should you, unless short of roof space?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200303#Comment_200303</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200303#Comment_200303</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:38:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: fostertom</cite>Why should you, unless short of roof space?</blockquote> In the old days no one worried about vehicle fuel efficiency, now it helps sell cars. Thought the same approach could help sell solar! Maybe I'm wrong.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200305#Comment_200305</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200305#Comment_200305</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:09:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I thought it was safety features that sold cars, or was that back in the 1990's]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200310#Comment_200310</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200310#Comment_200310</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:22:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>snyggapa</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[fuel efficiency does not directly equate to solar cell efficiency though . Fuel efficiency in effect saves you fuel every journey. <br />solar cell efficiency is of academic interest unless you are constrained on space, as with less efficient cells you just use more of them.<br /><br />However the improvement in technology is absolutely to be applauded though - if the improvements filter down to mainstream and costs eventually decrease then it's a good thing - it's just not likely relevant to 95+% of the customers at this point<br /><br />For my roof, since I could only fit 6 panels I went for Sanyo HITs - I paid a large premium for them and are very happy, but I only got these because I needed 1.4kWp to meet building regs - if I had more roof I would have used more, less efficient but cheaper panels with a higher output overall.<br /><br />of course if more efficient panels were available at a price than enhanced the overall payback, then it's a no-brainer<br /><br />-Steve]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200349#Comment_200349</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200349#Comment_200349</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:48:55 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Viking House</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi Steve, how much were they per m2?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200367#Comment_200367</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200367#Comment_200367</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:14:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: Viking House</cite>Hi Steve, how much were they per m2?</blockquote>No idea, the quote was from some advertising blurb about their R&D efforts, not even sure they are in production yet!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200369#Comment_200369</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200369#Comment_200369</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:35:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Ed Davies</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Too many Steves. Think VH was asking about Snyggapa's Sanyo HITs.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200449#Comment_200449</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200449#Comment_200449</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:24:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>snyggapa</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[hard to say per m2 , the quote wasn't itemised  <br /><br />6 (total 7.4m2) of panels cost us Â£8K so you could say >Â£1000/m2 - however the biggest part of that figure would be for installer's inflated profit margin under the old FIT regime. Less efficient panels would not have cost me much less]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200452#Comment_200452</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200452#Comment_200452</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:31:25 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The installer probably made a couple of grand, sales person about 500 quid.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200458#Comment_200458</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200458#Comment_200458</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:52:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>snyggapa</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[it was 1 man bob so he probably made the lot - however my choices at the time were limited to bob hope, or no hope... I don't begrudge him it, it was the market price at the time. <br /><br />I could probably have got the job done for half price a week later - that was the market price then... (who says that subsidies don't distort the market)<br /><br />-Steve]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200493#Comment_200493</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=200493#Comment_200493</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:32:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Viking House</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[To convert a 100m2 Passive House to Energy Plus with sufficient surplus energy to power an electric car (3,000kWh) we'd need 8,000kWh, if we use PV-T we'd need 5,000kWh PV and 3,000kWh Solar Thermal.<br />Will that fit on the roof?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=204665#Comment_204665</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=204665#Comment_204665</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:02:11 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Greig Wilson</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Solar Cell/panel efficiency is only a factor if your tight for space, or would like to have a few less panels on your roof for aesthetic reasons. If you have a small roof and require a higher efficiency panel you will be paying more, Panasonic are one of the best panels but you get much better Â£/w value for LG's higher efficiency panels. Ranging from 265watt -300watt panels (top 18.3% Module efficiency) compared to an average 250watt panel (14.93%) efficiency. <br /><br />Remember that the panasonic efficiency is for the cell not the module efficiency which will be less. <br /><br />I have a brief guide on some points to look at on our website;<br /><a href="http://green-uk.com/solar-pv/choosing-right-panels" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://green-uk.com/solar-pv/choosing-right-panels</a><br /><br />Ultimately though the system will only perform if designed and installed well.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar Cell Conversion Efficiency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=204873#Comment_204873</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11986&amp;Focus=204873#Comment_204873</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 20:54:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>rhamdu</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Go for the best price per installed kilowatt.<br /><br />Roof space considerations don't really affect the choice unless you are either (1) off-grid or (2) prepared to spend extra money to save the planet, regardless of financial return on your investment.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>