Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorJohan
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    Posted By: Jeff Norton (NZ)
    Posted By: DantenzYes ET's visibly change colour when failed. I personally think you can get too wrapped here in what is marginal differences in performance between ET's and FP's. I re-itterate, the energy is free at the end of the day; what's all the fuss about. The extra output ET'S give during lower solar gain on cloudy and colder days amounts to very little averaged over the year.



    Please show how? Have you a link to some research?


    Yes, there is research into this, please see page 49 of this report: http://www.sp.se/sv/units/energy/Documents/ETk/SP%20rapp%202002-20.pdf

    Short Swedish-English vocabulary:

    Vacuumrör = ET
    Plana = FP
    TVV-last = DHW load
    Radiatorlast = Radiator load

    Please note this report is for a combi system (DHW+space heating). If you're only using 2-4m2 solar panels for hot water it seems pretty irrelavent which type you use as you'll get very little coverage out of them in the winter anyway (you're unlikley to get 100% in the summer even). Assume a 3-4 cloudy summer days, with 200-300l cylinder you'll run out of hotwater even if you're using ET's. If you look at the curves you'll see that you'll need around 9m2 of ET's to get 100% coverage of the DHW in the summer (and probaly a 750l-800l accumulator tank to store the heat).
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    Tony,

    '3 -- Not necessarily -- it is possible to have solar and a combi'

    How is this possible and is it as cheap as the 'normal' way?

    Agu
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    Some combi boilers will work with hot water going in, it is also possible to thermally mix hot water from the solar and combi to get the solar warmer

    Not sure what you mean by is it as cheap as normal way?
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    Not sure myself what I meant really was thinking I might have to install tanks and extra plumbing I suppose. Would I?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    If you are going to have solar then you will have to have a hot cylinder yes.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    When I use your link Johan, it redirects me elsewhere
    • CommentAuthorGBP-Keith
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008 edited
     
    You can now vote for your favourite option. Go to the top of the page in this thread to cast your vote.
    • CommentAuthorcraigstuart
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008 edited
     
    I discovered this website http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk which says that a DTI study in 2001 showed evacuated tubes to be more efficient. They have a direct feed, which they claim is far more efficient than antifreeze evacuated tubes. Is direct heat more efficient? anyone?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    efficiency has little meaning in this discussion.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    One person one vote?
    • CommentAuthorMiked2714
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008 edited
     
    Re the comparative performance issue I agree data are rare. But given that dearth, over on the Navitron forums members (presumably all with evacuated tube systems) post details of their tank temperatures each month. These will be critically dependent on the actual system, particularly the size of the tank relative to the size of the panel, and also the pipe runs, but people are getting surprisingly good results in winter. Perhaps this winter has been unseasonally sunny.
    Mike

    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: craigstuart</cite>I discovered this website<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk">http://www.heatmyhome.co.uk</a>which says that a DTI study in 2001 showed evacuated tubes to be more efficient. They have a direct feed, which they claim is far more efficient than antifreeze evacuated tubes. Is direct heat more efficient? anyone?</blockquote>

    My understanding is that 2nd generation heat pipe evacuated tubes would be more efficient than 1st generation tubes through which the water in the system flows, due to there being a lower volume of water and hence more responsive. Heatpipe / manifold systems still need antifreeze.

    Mike
    • CommentAuthorDan McNeil
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    James,

    Re. Planning issues for FP v ETs...

    Our planning authority is OK for us to install solar on a south facing roof in a conservation area without needing planning permission. However...to install without requiring planning permission, the panels must not protrude more than 100mm beyond the existing roofline. If they're likely to protrude more this this, a planning application would be required. The situation tends to vary quite a lot depending on your planning authority - some are more relaxed than others.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2008
     
    I don't think it's worth voting on a topic that there is inadequate information on: It gives credibility to one solution or the other with no particular scientific basis for doing so.
  1.  
    Dan,

    I've had 85mm (if I remember correctly) quoted by another Sheffield PA)..

    What's the thinnest above-roof-depth anyone thinks they can achieve for EVs....?

    J
  2.  
    Clear majority for EV then, but still some solid support for FP,

    J
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2008
     
    had a quick look at consolar uk web site and their tube panels are supposed to be only 55mm deep.

    Surely any tubes, if built into the roof rather than installed above the existing roof finish will be close to the 100mm if not below ????????? helps if you have thicker roof finish like high profile tiles etc.
    I would have thought that minimising profile would have been a high priority for designers from and aesthetic as well as technical perspective due to wind etc ???

    In the end, how many planners are going to get up on the roof and measure it anyway. If it looks there or there abouts from the ground, cant see there being a problem.

    As for FP vs tubes we are in the FP camp, but I think it is to a certain extent determined by what you want from them in the context of your overall system.
  3.  
    Terry, I think I must be in the FP camp too. Welcome to it - it feels like it is sparsely populated!!
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2008
     
    Hi Nick, thanks for the welcome.
    Slightly surprised at the small numbers as from long term reading here I had assumed there were many more of us.

    Come on FP's declare yourselves load and proud.

    Please note - no association with the flat earth society :bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthordocmartin
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2008 edited
     
    Anyone out there had experience of vulnerability to vandalism? Would FP be more resistant to stones or air rifles than ET? Nick Parsons very tall house would put his FP further from harm than a bungalow; theft could also become a problem on the above as ET are easily replaced and vice versa.
  4.  
    Nick,

    Do not fear, governements have been elected with 26% of the public vote...

    J
    • CommentAuthorHerbal
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2008
     
    We supply ET and FP, but only really reccomend ET. On our ET systems there is no water in the tubes, so if one gets broken on a 20 tube panel, all you lose is 5% of your heat. This can easily be replaced at your leasure for £15.

    If a FP gets a brick thrown at it, that's pretty much the end.

    H
    • CommentAuthorTerry
    • CommentTimeApr 5th 2008
     
    Interesting comments regarding vandalism. Also remember some issues with theft of panels from a while back.

    We have found an easy solution to safegard the panels - fit copper gutters and down pipes. Clever bit of distraction dont you think!
    I know this was a brilliant decision as, having just got off the phone to pay for them, there was report on the radio announcing a 300% rise in thefts of metals from buildings and building sites. :cry:
  5.  
    Herbal, we've got Schott tubes, and having got 2 'brick hits' (which amazingly only broke the outer skin only) I would now choose the plug-in, Thermomax-type. I was quoted £300 for the relacement of one tube.... I have mixed feelings about the Chinese gear, but was seriously wondering about replacing the whole array with cheap tubes and offering the Schott tubes for sale to others who have been unlucky enough to get theirs vandalised.

    Nick
    • CommentAuthorHerbal
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2008
     
    Hi Nick,

    This is why I got involved in renewables, £300 for a tube is virtually theft. There are a lot of people out there with consciences trying to make a difference, and a few people feeding of their good will by ripping them off.

    We sell an entire 20 panel INCLUDING the tubes for less than £400 retail. I do not know why there is negativity on the Chinese panels, we sell several thousand every year and are regularly being told that ours are the most efficient on the market, roughly twice as efficient as a FP.

    H
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 7th 2008
     
    Hi Herbal

    Is this information on your company's pricing available anywhere on the net?
    • CommentAuthorHerbal
    • CommentTimeApr 9th 2008
     
    Yes it is but I'm not sure if I an say on this blog. Send me an e-mail to my company e-mail address and I'll tell you where: steve@navitron.org.uk

    H
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeApr 10th 2008
     
    Herbal are you bringing the sloar showers to Glasto this year?? If so can i request one just outside my tent?
    • CommentAuthorHerbal
    • CommentTimeApr 10th 2008
     
    Agu, Hi there. I've literally just come off the phone to them, they are trying to move us away from the slurry lagoon - which will be nicer for everyone! Let's hope for a bit more sun this year, in fact some sun would be nice.

    We've added another 160 tubes to the roof of the trailer (making 480 tubes = 24 x 20 tube panels). Over the week this should generate 1.5 megaWatts of power.

    We're adding a 20kW wood burner with heat exchanger on the bed of the trailer to heat the water if the sun does not come out. Even if we don't need it it will be nice to sit around at night when we get the guitars out.

    Wind turbines and PV going on the roof to power the pumps and controllers, and if all else fails, a lister engine running on cooking oil.

    We'll have a picture of the new set up on our web site by June if you want a look. Should be impressive.

    See you there.

    H
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 10th 2008
     
    Could you whisper the info to me instead: Emailing didn't see to work too well!

    Rgds

    Jon
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeApr 11th 2008
     
    Herbal,

    I'll have to come and say hi and check out your array so to speak. Also steal some heat of an evening and sing when you get the guitars out!!!

    Agu
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press