Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2017
     
    Blimey, just use glue!
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeFeb 27th 2017
     
    Posted By: gravelldIf you use a bedding strip does the screw go to the side of that, so two strips per board interface?

    Seems very labour intensive?

    I'm not quite sure I understand you, but I would use one bedding strip and screw or nail through it if I was using bedding strips. The bedding strip seals around the fixing, and it means the airtightness of the stud is not a factor.

    As Tom says, glue is an alternative.
    • CommentAuthorgravelld
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2017
     
    Oh right, sounds good. How does it seal around the fixing then?

    So you have a strip along each line of fixings along an edge?

    As I said above, I don't trust glue if it sets hard, but then I don't understand the physics Tom is talking about regarding stiffness of the structure, so maybe that's distrust out of ignorance.

    Still wondering about Orcon F, but I guess £££.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2017
     
    Posted By: gravelldI don't understand the physics Tom is talking about
    Doubt if Tom does :wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2017
     
    Where/how long have you been saving up that quote, to use, ST? Not from this topic. I doubt gravelld even meant what you make it look.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2017
     
    :bigsmile::bigsmile::bigsmile:
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeFeb 28th 2017
     
    Posted By: gravelldHow does it seal around the fixing then?

    I'd suggest getting hold of a bit and having a go.
    • CommentAuthorgravelld
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017 edited
     
    Posted By: djh
    I'd suggest getting hold of a bit and having a go.
    Good, and accurate, answer. :tongue:
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    Well, I guess to answer one of the questions about longevity is to test it - that could be in a lab or it could be to take something like Tom's ridged, screwed and glued monocoque designs and test it say 10 years in - and again in 20 years - at some point we could, with some authority conclude that either we are putting his PII insurer on notice or that he's cracked airtightness at a stroke

    To answer another question - there has to be a design life - it may well be that we use the building beyond that, but no designer will sign up to a product with an infinite lifespan

    Any architect putting an infinite life on a building is either so old they'll be dead before any problems arise, is so reckless that they are probably uninsurable or so stupid as to be not worth employing

    As I said, for other than very small buildings I'd not be missing out on expansion joints. FWIW, I've seen air tests run in something akin to a hot box where OSB is correctly installed to studs with a 3mm expansion joint and we've then proceeded to put some pretty big fans into one half to measure leakage rates - it was actually pretty impressive - more than adequate to combat a 500Pa overpressure and to maintain a specific gas concentration on the test side - it did improve when the stud was tacked with 3mm closed cell foam and then the sheet material nailed on (ring shanks and air nailer) the improvement was actually that spectacular however- these were "proof tests" we did for a PFI school building (that was likely to be replicated in a number of locations with different "outer claddings"

    Regards

    Barney
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    I don't think anybody would argue for an indefinite design life, but I would categorize anything with a design life of 60 years or less as temporary housing, rather than an acceptable goal as you suggested. Of course there will be maintenance required during its lifetime.

    Did they perform airtightness tests both with overpressure and underpressure? It's the situation where the nails are in tension that would concern me more. Also the situation after a few years of seasonal movement and possibly shakes developing in the studs. That's when I would expect compression gaskets or flexible glues to earn their keep.

    I'll try to remember to run another airtightness test after we've been here ten years, or earlier if anybody wants to fund it. That should show something about membranes and tapes, as well as wet plaster.

    Just out of interest I went looking and according to http://www.siga.ch/en/company/company-history.html Rissan was launched in 1994 followed by Sicrall in 1997. So they've been around for over twenty years - I wonder if any independent tests have been done of the first installations?

    Pro clima claim on https://proclima.com/service/100-years-adhesion "Re­li­able func­tion­ing tested for 100 years
    In­de­pend­ently con­firmed", but they are lying of course. They have tested their products in an accelerated aging programme for 700 days. I have no idea how realistic the results are, though I expect there are experts who do.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    One issue we have in the UK, is that given each home is owned by a different person, but they are all joint together, we don’t have a system that lets us rebuild them. In the USA homes are designed for 60 years and rebuilt after that time, but they mostly live in large plots in detached homes.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    Posted By: djhI wonder if any independent tests have been done of the first installations?
    That would be very valuable, but I'd understand if the cos aren't keen to open that can of worms!

    Posted By: djhAlso the situation after a few years of seasonal movement and possibly shakes developing in the studs. That's when I would expect compression gaskets or flexible glues to earn their keep.
    Exactly - except the bit about flexible glues? My feel for it is that specifically rigid glues (which tho gapfilling are (initially) pulled down near-zero thickness in enough spots to minimise any elastic/shear movement) would fare better - uncompromisingly holding things motionless - and not releasing that hold when timbers shrink enough to let let nails/screws go slack.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    60 years most certainly couldn't be classed as "temporary" could it - whilst I do very little housing work, I did a project for social housing a little while back that had about a 40 year life set by the client - they really did want cheap, but reasonably well performing

    Yes, we did both overpressure and under pressure - OSB nailed with full head ring shanks and at the correct centres (which are often tighter than your average installer imagines) showed no hint of moving at 500Pa positive and negative (for the actual application, there can be significant underpressure during the gas release cycle)

    If the studs are going to move about then most certainly nailing into a resilient bed would outperform any rigid sticky stuff - it only has to move once and it's "gone" as a seal

    I think my point however was that well nailed OSB with adequate bearing onto the stud (which could of course be metal with screw fixings) performed remarkably well at 500Pa - which is probably a lot more than local wind pressures. I would suspect that interfaces between elements are the weak points in reality - doors and windows to walls, walls to roofs etc. The test box did actually show a dramatic fail when we lost a short section of silicone mastic between the panels and the enclosure - it was very short section at a corner, not intended to be part of the test, but when it failed, it totally dominated the leakage - it had just shrunk back a little from the box, rather than the OSB

    Regards

    Barney
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017 edited
     
    Posted By: barney500Pa - which is probably a lot more than local wind pressures.
    ½ρv² gives 28 m/s or 62 mph - top end of storm force 10. That's simple “face on” dynamic pressure, not any sort of aerofoil lift. Not a case you'd worry about a bit of leakage but certainly wouldn't want failure at those speeds, e.g., cracking of ridged glue which is then leaky forever more.

    >>> math.sqrt(1000/1.28)
    27.95084971874737
    >>> math.sqrt(1000/1.28) * 3600 / 1609
    62.53763765537013

    That's almost worth remembering: 100 km/h wind gives 500 Pa pressure.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    Posted By: Ed DaviesThat's almost worth remembering: 100 km/h wind gives 500 Pa pressure.
    Had a few days of them recently.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMar 1st 2017
     
    Is that American or English mpg?
    • CommentAuthorgravelld
    • CommentTimeMar 2nd 2017
     
    Posted By: djh
    Just out of interest I went looking and according tohttp://www.siga.ch/en/company/company-history.html" rel="nofollow" >http://www.siga.ch/en/company/company-history.htmlRissan was launched in 1994 followed by Sicrall in 1997. So they've been around for over twenty years - I wonder if any independent tests have been done of the first installations?
    I thought I read/heard recently they had opened up one/some of the original Passivhauses and found them in good nick? But not sure if they used tape or not...
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press