<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:27:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=41426#Comment_41426</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=41426#Comment_41426</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'll take a look at the may data Ed.<br /><br />hotelrefurber, <br />1. I cannot give averges other than what you can see in this thread:<br /><a href="http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2342&page=1#Item_9" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2342&page=1#Item_9</a><br /><br />until a year has elapsed.<br /><br />2. To replace my batteries with secondhand forklift batteries (the most common choice for offgridders) would probably cost about Â£4000. However, i believe that providing i can keep my generation higher than my demand my batteries will have an almost unlimited lifespan. batteries seem to die when they constantly kept close to discharged. I expect mine to just act as buffers.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=45934#Comment_45934</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=45934#Comment_45934</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[December 2008]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=45935#Comment_45935</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=45935#Comment_45935</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[January 2009. The tracker spent many days locked down and facing South during December and January because there has been adequate wind resource (see my offgrid data in another thread). I don't see the point in exposing the array to extreme windy conditions unnecessarily.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=56373#Comment_56373</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=56373#Comment_56373</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:14:29 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This 750w array has produced a total of 1160kWh in the year since last June. my little brain suggests that this is a performance increase of about 58% over a static array of the same size assuming an average (probably generous) yield of 960 kWh/kWp.<br /><br /><br />Yields are explained quite well here: <a href="http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/rooftop-solar-power-in-the-uk-" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://lightbucket.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/rooftop-solar-power-in-the-uk-</a>â€“-real-world-data/<br /><br />"The â€œyieldâ€ of a photovoltaic system is the amount of energy it produces in a year divided by the rated peak capacity. The units of yield are usually kilowatt-hours per kilowatt-peak. This quantity is just another way of expressing the ratio of mean power-to-peak power.<br /><br />Yields on the domestic PV systems in the field trial varied from below 400â€‰kWh/kWp to over 900â€‰kWh/kWp, but the largest number of sites was in the yield range 701â€“800â€‰kWh/kWp. This range of yields is equivalent to a mean power-to-peak power ratio of 8.0%â€“9.1%, about what youâ€™d expect for UK insolation levels."]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60028#Comment_60028</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60028#Comment_60028</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:00:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>SimonH</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi Keith,<br /><br />Have you got any upadted figures for this lovely "summer" we're having? I was wondering if it means outputs are 10%, 50% or 90% lower than usual!<br /><br />I'm currently putting together a proposal for a series of community owned PV plants, so would like to get some min/max figures dependent on weather. Currently using an assumed 750kWh/year per peak KW.<br /><br />Cheers,<br /><br />Simon.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60035#Comment_60035</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60035#Comment_60035</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:17:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>billt</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[You should go to the PVGIS site - <a href="http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/." target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/.</a><br /><br />That should to give you a good idea of the output of your proposed system.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60056#Comment_60056</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60056#Comment_60056</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:09:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>stephendv</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Simon, bear in mind that Keith has 2 setups:<br />1 with a mechanical tracker AND an MPPT charge controller<br />1 with a static array and a non-MPPT charge controller<br /><br />There is a third option, that many people go for, and which is quite cost effective, which is static array with MPPT charge controller.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60062#Comment_60062</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60062#Comment_60062</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:12:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Simon H. I am getting good results even though the summer has been a bit dodgy (I will post them here soon, I promise). That is because the tracker can harvest the sunshine regardless of where it is in the sky. The static is less than normal though because it relies upon the sun putting in an appearance during a short 11.30 am to 4.30 pm window which has been harder to find.<br /><br />stwephendv's point is partly valid though. no one should install a system without mppt.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60101#Comment_60101</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60101#Comment_60101</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:50:37 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>scott</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[dual axis trackers offer the best outputs<br />especially with uk limited  sun conditions and short number of hours<br />as used in most all big solar parks<br />expensive to buy though<br />can get them as small as to 300watts to take 1x300Wp modules or 2x150Wp]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60145#Comment_60145</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60145#Comment_60145</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:57:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>stephendv</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[trackers have to compete with the falling price of PV panels.  When panels were more expensive they made more sense, because you could maximise the output from your PV investment.  Nowadays, it's usually cheaper to just buy more panels than it is to invest in trackers (and in their associated maintenance costs).<br />The vast majority of solar parks are static, not tracked.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60196#Comment_60196</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60196#Comment_60196</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:42:40 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Terry</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Interesting point stephendv. Would it be of any use in a static setup to manually adjust the angle through the year - on frame mounted units - say once or twice a month or would it not be worth the effort of building the facility into the frame??]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60223#Comment_60223</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60223#Comment_60223</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:07:01 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>fostertom</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[On <a href="http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=4420&page=1#Item_23" target="_self" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=4420&page=1#Item_23</a> there's discussion about exactly why we should try to turn glass-fronted solar panels, PV or wet, perp to the sun's rays - there 2 separate reasons as far as I can see - and how much tolerance there is in that, for practical purposes.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60253#Comment_60253</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60253#Comment_60253</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:13:38 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>stephendv</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Terry, I think for small systems that are already on frames it would be worthwhile.  It will even be worthwhile to use DIY mechanical trackers that can be built cheaply.  But when you start looking at the commercially available units they just don't make economic sense for most applications.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60344#Comment_60344</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=60344#Comment_60344</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:23:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>GBP-Keith</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This is a monitoring thread people so please move the discussion about 'tracking or not' to a new thread folks. Most of this will get deleted when I get around to bringing the stats up to date.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=137615#Comment_137615</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=137615#Comment_137615</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteveZ</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Even though this thread seems to have been inactive since 2009, the monitoring aspect is interesting. My system uses panel-based MPPT so it may be useful to look at it here.<br /><br />These are the results from the first full month (Feb 2012) of operation of my 4kWp PV array. It is arranged on two orientations. 3kW (12 panels) due East and 1kW (4 panels) due South, located just East of Bodmin Moor in Cornwall. I am interested to see how it compares with any similar 'conventional' inverter array as I have a system using on-panel Max Power Point Tracking, rather than that being done by the Inverter. In theory , it could give better power production, although there are slightly bigger losses in the circuitry.<br /><br />Is a total of 166kWh good, bad or indifferent for this array in the South West UK?<br /><br />BTW the difference in performance between the East and South sections is very marked at this time of year. As an example from one sunny day, East produced 2.1Kwh per 1kWp and the South 3.7Kwh per 1Kwp. I hope the sunrise moving towards the NE as the year progresses will bring the performance of the East section back to the theoretical 85% of a due South array.<br /><br />Date		Energy (Wh)<br />01/02/12		7880<br />02/02/12		9473<br />03/02/12		9480<br />04/02/12		1034<br />05/02/12		5654<br />06/02/12		2664<br />07/02/12		9419<br />08/02/12		9973<br />09/02/12		8983<br />10/02/12		841<br />11/02/12		8057<br />12/02/12		3354<br />13/02/12		4076<br />14/02/12		4781<br />15/02/12		2926<br />16/02/12		5045<br />17/02/12		4425<br />18/02/12		3784<br />19/02/12		8068<br />20/02/12		7983<br />21/02/12		5432<br />22/02/12		1889<br />23/02/12		4895<br />24/02/12		3149<br />25/02/12		5781<br />26/02/12		10664<br />27/02/12		3589<br />28/02/12		2866<br />29/02/12		10291<br /> Total Wh		166454<br />Total kWh		166]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140396#Comment_140396</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140396#Comment_140396</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So from the results above I've concluded that as I have a large garden and a poorly orinated roof (for a fixed installation) that maybe I'd be better going down the tracker array route? I'm also thinking that if and when I move house I could pack the whole lot up a and take it with me?<br /><br />If I were to construct my own system how easy would it be? Doing a Google suggest that there is loads of kit available, but which is the best and most robust?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140435#Comment_140435</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140435#Comment_140435</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cbatjesmond</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: SteveZ</cite>Is a total of 166kWh good, bad or indifferent for this array in the South West UK?</blockquote><br />Can plug www.bdpv.com again?  They provide a way of sharing PV production data and seeing others' production.  The nearest site to you appears to be http://bdpv.com/fiche_utilisateur_en.php?util=iain  <br /><br />When you compare two systems it automatically scales to kWh/kWp, which is v.convenient.<br /><br />To provide a direct answer:  166kWh seems good to me, but my 1.72kWp system only produced 68kWh in February ... at 55N.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Solar tracker with MPPT data</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140444#Comment_140444</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=1672&amp;Focus=140444#Comment_140444</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 19:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>SteamyTea</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not one place in Cornwall <img src="/newforum/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/standard/sad.gif" alt=":sad:" title=":sad:" />]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>