Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:07:36 +0100 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3144#Comment_3144 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3144#Comment_3144 Sun, 13 May 2007 12:23:03 +0100 PDobson
If Tri-Iso 10 is much better and I am missing out by not using it perhaps I should ditch NHBC who wont let me use it. Does anyone know if Premier or Build Zone are more amenable to new materials?]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3145#Comment_3145 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3145#Comment_3145 Sun, 13 May 2007 12:47:14 +0100 PDobson ]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3301#Comment_3301 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3301#Comment_3301 Fri, 18 May 2007 12:39:33 +0100 Charlie Duke Thinsulux when combined with other insulation materials has all the necessary approvals and will be acceptable to Building Control Officers and NHBC.
Tri-iso has no current approval (although still being allowed by some councils) but can be used, like Thinsulex, if combined with other materials. In this case a U-value of only 1.7 can be ascribed to the Tri-iso rather than the 5 or 6 claimed by the manufacturer.
In my opinion using Tri-iso combined with other material would give better insulation than Thinsulux, but if installed as manufacturer recommends would take up more space.]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3333#Comment_3333 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=280&Focus=3333#Comment_3333 Sun, 20 May 2007 07:24:07 +0100 Mike George