Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



  1.  
    Seems to me this discussion is primarily about optimising the (well-known) properites of thermal mass by adjusting the phasing of the passage of exterior warmth/coolth into the interior - a good idea in itself, but...it assumes a common regularity of internal and external heating/cooling to work. Given that day length varies through the seasons, we can have days which are isothermal or warmer at night than during the day and that peoples patterns of heating vary widely due to differing lifestyles, I'm not sure of the benefits of doing anything other than aiming for a significant thermal mass inside a well insulated envelope.

    Chris
    •  
      CommentAuthorjoe90
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    I too, am an advocate of the large thermal mass inside lots of insulation and I am considering straw bale construction with clay/lime rendering both sides.

    I would imagine that straw in compression had good decrement delay and its insulation value is also high but leaving asside the internal walls and floor does straw/clay/lime constitute high thermal mass?

    Joe
  2.  
    ChrisEngland - yes that's where I had got to too; I keep failing to find a practical application that might assist me. But rather than "significent mass", could we say mass of a quantity and type sufficient to limit variations inside to a couple of degrees over a period greater than 24hrs?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    Posted By: ChrisEnglandby adjusting the phasing of the passage of exterior warmth/coolth into the interior
    That's only the classic, well-known illustrative use of decrement , suitable for Arizona (blistering hot days, v cold nights). Other uses aren't so at-a-glance simple to understand, but believe me, decrement is happening all the time in every building, whether you build it into your calcs or not. I don't fully understand decrement yet but when I do, am sure it's an understanding that can be wonderously exploited in e.g. any kind of heat storage (whether in the structural elements, or remote). Understanding of decrement can also avoid unexpected and unwelcome temp swings even in simple state-of-art Passivhaus-type interiors, where the sun comes in thro windows and is expected to be soaked up (preventing overheating), stored and released by the heavy surfaces the radiation falls on.

    Anyone know of any plain-language texts that explain decrement (not just its promised effect, but how it works) without resorting to equations and calculus?
  3.  
    Fostertom -
    While decrement may have some role to play, I'm concerned that what you're actually talking about are the detailed thermal flows, which are going to be so variable that little can be extracted from them, other than in highly specific locations - e.g. your Arizona example - except the more general concept of thermal mass - on which point, and regarding your Passivhaus comment, I've always thought thermal mass would be better inside the house (as opposed to the external walls) with both high mass and high conductivity - something like thick concrete (hiss) internal walls interlaced with steel to get the warmth in and out. I'd be glad to be proved wrong, however.

    Gotanewlife - I can't really state an optimum mass, but that soundes reasonable - obviously what you'd need would vary with location/air-tightness and of cource cost would come into it. As above, I believe internal mas swould be better than perimeter.

    Chris
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009
     
    Chris, planning for decrement delay is definitely most worthwhile where the average indoor temperature is similar to the average outdoor temperature, as in fostertom's Arizona or as (I suspect) in Adnams warehouse. And it is sometimes oversold as a benefit of particular build systems for houses in predominantly heating climates, so it gets a confused reputation. I've read elsewhere that the time constant in typical passivhaus-type interiors tends to be several days - i.e. there's already a huge 'decrement' of temperature variations. Uncontrolled solar gain is the big problematic exception.

    Water has high thermal mass and can move large quantities of heat around (by convective or pumped motion rather than by conductivity). It can be a pretty good alternative to concrete if you want added thermal mass.

    Tom, I'm not sure what kind of explanation you're looking for. Heat is vibration of atoms. Heat moves by these vibrations being passed on from one atom to another. The passing on takes time, depending on what atoms are involved and how they're connected together (think of a Newton's cradle toy, for example) and there's a constant averaging, smearing of temperature differences goes on because the vibrations spread in all directions from everywhere. So there's a delay and the variation is decremented.

    Cheers, Dave

    PS As an aside, the term 'decrement delay' is two words and they both have a point. The delay obviously refers to the time it takes heat to pass through walls etc. The decrement refers to the fact that the amplitude of external temperature oscillations is reduced inside the building. So I think decrement delay is quite a good name for the phenomena.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: djhI've read elsewhere that the time constant in typical passivhaus-type interiors tends to be several days
    I'd love to see that, Dave.

    I'd thought only 1.5 days, 2 days max, which explain why Passivhaus still requires back-up heating, and always will even if insulation etc increased even more. 1.5 to 2 days is v far short of what's reqd to bridge over typical sunless spells.

    I'm working on increasing that to say 10 days, still within the above-ground structure (NB this is a different line of enquiry than underground/interseasonal storage, tho there's much cross-over). That in turn means that far more heat has to be collected and put into storage. Capturing more of what's available, when the sun shines, increases risk of overheating. So it's about ways and means, then a different set of prudent balances between collection/loss/overheating etc, compared to Passivhaus's set of prudent balances.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: djhthe term 'decrement delay' is two words and they both have a point. The delay obviously refers to the time it takes heat to pass through walls etc. The decrement refers to the fact that the amplitude of external temperature oscillations is reduced inside the building. So I think decrement delay is quite a good name for the phenomena
    I agree - will do, from now on.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 17th 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: fostertomI'd love to see that, Dave.

    I read it on the AECB forum, IIRC, Tom.
    • CommentAuthormike7
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    sinnerboy - re your excel query - there's an error in cell C28:- =(1.38*C29)*(SQRT(C30*C31)/(3.6*C32)). The bracket left of the SQRT should be to the right of it thus:- =(1.38*C29)*SQRT((C30*C31)/(3.6*C32))

    Apart from that, the 3.6 figure is the difference between the two formulae. That's probably due to a combination of using seconds in one place versus hours in the other and a factor of 1000 somewhere in the units. Brain fade took over at this point.
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeDec 20th 2009
     
    Thanks Mike
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeDec 22nd 2009
     
    Just located this programme which

    "Draws a detail of wall or roof sections, calculates U-value, Time Lag, and Decrement Factor. It plots temperature drop through the section. Draws 2-D daily and 3-D annual plots of Outdoor and Sol-Air Temperatures, Normal and Total Surface Radiation, and Heat Flow through the envelope. It was originally called SOLAR-3. Unzip the download and install OPAQUE by clicking on SETUP.EXE, and to see the Users Manual open Manual.txt"

    http://www.energy-design-tools.aud.ucla.edu/tools/opaque2-1.zip

    here

    http://www.energy-design-tools.aud.ucla.edu/
    • CommentAuthormike7
    • CommentTimeDec 27th 2009
     
    Sinnerboy - these formulae don't make sense to me:-

    "1st one
    Thermal lag = 1.382*thickness * sqr(density*specific heat / 3.6*thermal conductivity)

    2nd one
    tl = 1.38 * L * SQRT(1/a)

    where:
    tl = time lag (in hours)
    L = Thickness of component (unit?)
    a = thermal diffusivity, = thermal conductivity / (density * specific heat)"


    The dimensions don't work out, never mind the units. The formula has to be something like this:

    tl hrs = L squared x sp.ht x density / (conductivity x C)

    where C is a constant somewhere in the region of 20,000, L is in metres, sp.ht is in J/kg.degK, density is in kg/m^3, and conductivity is in W/m.degK
    • CommentAuthormike7
    • CommentTimeDec 30th 2009
     
    Note that if the above is right, the delay is proportional to the square of the thickness - ie. double the thickness and you quadruple the delay. Seems important.

    (Re the formulae first quoted - I wonder if there wasn't just a mis-transcription somewhere along the way, squareroot instead of squared. That would account for the difference)
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press