| Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
|
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: Water Systems
That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.
Posted By: ralphdPosted By: Water Systems
That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.
Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.
It's not the whole point though; as Paul said everything is a tradeoff. What's the cost/benefit?
Posted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdPosted By: Water Systems
That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.
Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.
You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.
Posted By: JohnhI've been studying this thread and crusoes comments on another thread in the hope of using a couple of wood fired boilers(plus solar at a later date) to heat a thermal store/heat bank.
Then WS says this -
"we have no alternative to gas, oil and elec'."
Eh? Are you (WS) saying that all your comments are based around using TS/HBanks with non woodfired/biomass systems?
Posted By: ralphdPosted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdPosted By: Water Systems
That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.
Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.
You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.
Emphasize != provided evidence.
Posted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdPosted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdPosted By: Water Systems
That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.
Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.
You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.
Emphasize != provided evidence.
I wrote: "You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less."
Anyone with the slightest inkling of engineering nous can see that. Note: "risk free alternative".
Posted By: ralphdDerogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.
Posted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdDerogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.
The point is near risk free vs a risk that could take down your house. You appear not to see it. If you can't just take mu word for it, a vented heat bank will not take down the side of your house.
Posted By: ralphdPosted By: Water SystemsPosted By: ralphdDerogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.
The point is near risk free vs a risk that could take down your house. You appear not to see it. If you can't just take my word for it, a vented heat bank will not take down the side of your house.
I do not dispute the risk. Based on the number of documented cases in North America and the number of installations, it appears to be less than one in a million.
I disputed the cost claims. And I won't just take your word for it. I don't ask people to take my word either; scientists believe data not people.
-Ralph
Posted By: ralphdWater Systems: saying it costs no more doesn't make it true.
CAD330 is roughly ÂŁ185. Many of the north american products are made in Asia, so landed cost in the UK would be similar to here. So the cost of a vented cylinder with a 270L capacity should be equal to or less than ÂŁ185. Given your reliance on assertions instead of facts, I suspect the cost is much more than ÂŁ185.
Posted By: crusoeTo get back to the main thread of this debate, despite his undoubted ability to ruffle feathers, Water Systems has it pretty well-nailed. You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.
Posted By: nigelPosted By: crusoeTo get back to the main thread of this debate, despite his undoubted ability to ruffle feathers, Water Systems has it pretty well-nailed. You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.
Well I don't agree he has nailed anything. There is no such thing as the perfect solution and there is no point preaching that Thermal Stores are a perfect solution for every situation because neither you or Water Systems have produced any EVIDENCE to support your claims.
Water Systems claims that using a thermal store is more efficient than a modulating boiler, with weather compensation, to supply space heating.
He claims Cranfield have researched this but no one can find it and he will not provide a link to it.
Does it exist?
It is my view that a well designed heating system using a gas condensing boiler is likely to be more efficient measured over a season than the thermal store.
The Thermal Stores solution requires a body of water to kept at a static temperature to be used to produce space heating and DHW.
According to Gledhill this should be kept at least at 70c - regardless of outside temperature.
So there is continuous heat loss from this store which given its high temperature will be significant.
There is also the question of return temperatures to the boiler which have never been answered.
Gledhill quote 11c temp drop which gives a return temperature of 59c.
Water Systems tells this out of date does not point us to an updated specification or an alternative product.
A similar concept to thermal stores is used in modern district heating systems where a heat main is kept at a high temperatures and plate heat exchangers are used to supply space and dHW to individual properties. These require a flow temperature of 80c for the plate heat exchanger to provide the required performance.
This seems to be a common concern about thermal stores which makes them LESS EFFICIENT in many situations.
For the last time provide some EVIDENCE of thermal store temperatures and boiler return temperatures or we will all just assume you have not got any.
Posted By: TunaLots of strong opinions and SHOUTING in this thread.
Clearly any given heating system will not be appropriate for all possible circumstances. If you only intend to heat your home and hot water with a condensing gas boiler then a thermal store or heat bank might be viewed as overkill.
Posted By: jezza22Crusoe / WS, I've been (trying) to pick out the useful information from this thread as I'm seriously thinking of a new heat bank and have a couple of questions:
1 - sounds like a heat bank with an external heat plate X is the way to go - can you drink the hot water generated as it is mains fed and not stored? If so, then a good way to fill the kettle and save electricity?
2 - sounds like larger stores are better as they give you longer between re-heats - if I go for a 500 or 1000ltr store it will be heavy and need to be located on the ground floor - my concern is the time it might take to get hot water out of the plate X and upstairs to the bathrooms - is there anyway to minimise this as it is a waste of water plus a long dead-leg of hot water left to go cold between bathing?
3- also, if the store is located at ground floor level and I have a WB with a boiler on the same level would it need a pump (lattdomat?) as I assume it could not be gravity fed?