Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorralphd
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2009
     
    Posted By: Water Systems
    That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.

    Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.

    It's not the whole point though; as Paul said everything is a tradeoff. What's the cost/benefit?
  1.  
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.

    Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.


    You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.


    It's not the whole point though; as Paul said everything is a tradeoff. What's the cost/benefit?


    That is the point. There is no trade off. The unvented cylinder risk can be eliminated. Not to mention the ÂŁ60-ÂŁ100 a year service charge for having a cylinder of hot water in your house - which is ÂŁ1,000 over 10 years at todays prices, more in 10 years. Yikes!
    • CommentAuthorralphd
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2009
     
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.

    Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.


    You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.

    Emphasize != provided evidence.
    I posted before that my 270L unvented cylinder (with 2 4500W elements) cost under CAD330. There are NO annual service costs; annual service is not required by the mfr or by the National Plumbing code of Canada.
    http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/pubs/codes/nrcc47668_e.html
    http://www.gsw-wh.com/

    I can't even find a source for vented cylinders here from hardware stores.
    www.homedepot.ca
    www.kent.ca
    www.rona.ca
    • CommentAuthorJohnh
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2009
     
    I've been studying this thread and crusoes comments on another thread in the hope of using a couple of wood fired boilers(plus solar at a later date) to heat a thermal store/heat bank.

    Then WS says this -
    "we have no alternative to gas, oil and elec'."

    Eh? Are you (WS) saying that all your comments are based around using TS/HBanks with non woodfired/biomass systems?
  2.  
    Posted By: JohnhI've been studying this thread and crusoes comments on another thread in the hope of using a couple of wood fired boilers(plus solar at a later date) to heat a thermal store/heat bank.

    Then WS says this -
    "we have no alternative to gas, oil and elec'."

    Eh? Are you (WS) saying that all your comments are based around using TS/HBanks with non woodfired/biomass systems?


    My comment in that context was more an example. We don't need to use open coal fires as we have superior fuels and appliances that are much, much safer with far lower risks.
  3.  
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.

    Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.


    You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.

    Emphasize != provided evidence.


    I wrote: "You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less."

    Anyone with the slightest inkling of engineering nous can see that. Note: "risk free alternative".
    • CommentAuthorralphd
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2009
     
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    That is whole point - there is no need for unvented cylinders.

    Wrong and right. It is clear there is no need for unvented cylinders. In fact there isn't even a need for hot tap water; most people in the world live without it.


    You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less.

    Emphasize != provided evidence.


    I wrote: "You are being silly now. If you read what I wrote, I emphasized that there is a risk free alternative that costs no more - in fact may be less."

    Anyone with the slightest inkling of engineering nous can see that. Note: "risk free alternative".


    Derogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.
  4.  
    Posted By: ralphdDerogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.


    The point is near risk free vs a risk that could take down your house. You appear not to see it. If you can't just take my word for it, a vented heat bank will not take down the side of your house.
    • CommentAuthorralphd
    • CommentTimeFeb 9th 2009
     
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Derogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.


    The point is near risk free vs a risk that could take down your house. You appear not to see it. If you can't just take mu word for it, a vented heat bank will not take down the side of your house.


    I do not dispute the risk. Based on the number of documented cases in North America and the number of installations, it appears to be less than one in a million.

    I disputed the cost claims. And I won't just take your word for it. I don't ask people to take my word either; scientists believe data not people.

    -Ralph
  5.  
    Problem here is that the discussion has become confused between domestic hot water tanks, of which only unvented (i.e. mains pressure) ones are available in North America, and general purpose "heat banks" which may be larger or smaller than a DHW tank and serve as a buffer between heat supply and heat usage. I can easily visualize large "heat bank" acting as the buffer between a heat source (such as solar, wood or whatever) and a mains pressure point-of-use device such as a shower (assuming a heat exchanger with sufficient capacity). But if we're just talking domestic hot water tanks, the argument about risk is somewhat futile I think. How many people in the UK have had their DHW header tank in the attic burst, leak or otherwise cause serious damage? Might not be as dramatic as an explosion, but I bet the rate of gas explosions is higher than the rate of unvented hot water tank explosions - both are not fun for the occupants. Way back earlier in the thread Water Systems made some good points about the use of plate heat exchangers in "heat banks" that give rise to possibilities that are not present in a regular hot water tank. But descending to the level of name calling and "he said, she said" doesn't serve to educate or inform unfortunately. British plumbing is as a peculiar beast, especially to those who have no experience of it. In fact, to those who do, it is even more peculiar in retrospect, though a knowledge of the historical reasons for some of the features of it does help. I know that it would be impossible for me to have a British-style vented hot water tank even if I wanted one since there is nowhere to put the header tank - and the climate here would make such a system undesirable even it it was available. I'm not personally worried about my tank exploding due to overheating any more than I'm worried about having a gas explosion due to a leak (and many people over here in Eastern Canada are quite fearful of gas explosions - much more so than was my experience in the UK - I guess it all depends what you're used to).

    Paul in Montreal.
  6.  
    Posted By: ralphd
    Posted By: Water Systems
    Posted By: ralphd
    Derogatory remarks about my inkling of engineering are not evidence that vented cylinders cost no more than unvented.


    The point is near risk free vs a risk that could take down your house. You appear not to see it. If you can't just take my word for it, a vented heat bank will not take down the side of your house.


    I do not dispute the risk. Based on the number of documented cases in North America and the number of installations, it appears to be less than one in a million.

    I disputed the cost claims. And I won't just take your word for it. I don't ask people to take my word either; scientists believe data not people.

    -Ralph


    I can't speak for costs in N America. A risk free DHW only heat bank giving the same DHW delivery performance as an unvented cylinder costs no more in the UK. Then put in the other clear advantages, there is only one choice.
    • CommentAuthorralphd
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Water Systems: saying it costs no more doesn't make it true.
    CAD330 is roughly ÂŁ185. Many of the north american products are made in Asia, so landed cost in the UK would be similar to here. So the cost of a vented cylinder with a 270L capacity should be equal to or less than ÂŁ185. Given your reliance on assertions instead of facts, I suspect the cost is much more than ÂŁ185.
  7.  
    Posted By: ralphdWater Systems: saying it costs no more doesn't make it true.
    CAD330 is roughly ÂŁ185. Many of the north american products are made in Asia, so landed cost in the UK would be similar to here. So the cost of a vented cylinder with a 270L capacity should be equal to or less than ÂŁ185. Given your reliance on assertions instead of facts, I suspect the cost is much more than ÂŁ185.


    North American and EU unvented cylinders are banned in the UK, as they do not have enough safety devices and other aspects as well. UK unvented cylinders require approved men to install and service. Not a DIY thing.
    • CommentAuthorcrusoe
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Paul (in Montreal

    Thanks for the injection of common sense here. Gas safety is an issue, always has been unfortunately.

    ralphd

    Your rapid change of mind on UV safety welcomed by all I am sure. Your challenge refuted by your own countryman. But why DID it take Paul (from Montreal) to convince you, when Messrs Google & co provide so convenient a search facility....and when I provided you the specific url?

    Sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit (I have others in my charmery :)) but it can make the point effectively...WHY would you as a layman come out and say that the manual (written with expert guidance and officially approved over here) is wrong, when British methodology of installing/servicing tanks is based on the info in that manual? And when our standards of safety are demonstrably higher, precluding the use of NA-spec tanks here anyway...

    Heck, even your own firemen, after these incidents come out and say 'Please...get your tank maintained'. Try suggesting to the families - or schools - who have experienced this bomb that they really don't need maintenance. You think they'll welcome you with open arms? I would suggest you would be put in the local stocks.

    I believe you understand the arguments being made, they are cogent, and the risk is empirical, but you are playing semantics in order to win an argument. Whether you do or not is irrelevant to me, but inexpert opinions like these sure confuse the public on these forums. And make my job harder. You see, unlike you, I deal with the public every day advising on this issue and others similar. In this context, many of your comments aren't generally helpful - or accurate.

    As a legally-recognized competent person in the UK, (based on the information in that manual you wish to ignore)I am LEGALLY responsible if I cock up. And if, heaven forbid, I made a mistake in installation or servicing of this kit and it did go pear-shaped, I would be the person in the dock. You think my best defence might be 'Well, I was advised that North Americans don't need to service their tanks....'

    Can't see you leaping out in my defence somehow...

    To get back to the main thread of this debate, despite his undoubted ability to ruffle feathers, Water Systems has it pretty well-nailed. You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.

    In short, it gives you OPTIONS for the future. It will save you money too.

    Regards

    Crusoe
    • CommentAuthorjezza22
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Crusoe / WS, I've been (trying) to pick out the useful information from this thread as I'm seriously thinking of a new heat bank and have a couple of questions:

    1 - sounds like a heat bank with an external heat plate X is the way to go - can you drink the hot water generated as it is mains fed and not stored? If so, then a good way to fill the kettle and save electricity?

    2 - sounds like larger stores are better as they give you longer between re-heats - if I go for a 500 or 1000ltr store it will be heavy and need to be located on the ground floor - my concern is the time it might take to get hot water out of the plate X and upstairs to the bathrooms - is there anyway to minimise this as it is a waste of water plus a long dead-leg of hot water left to go cold between bathing?

    3- also, if the store is located at ground floor level and I have a WB with a boiler on the same level would it need a pump (lattdomat?) as I assume it could not be gravity fed?

    Thanks for all the expert advice
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Posted By: crusoeTo get back to the main thread of this debate, despite his undoubted ability to ruffle feathers, Water Systems has it pretty well-nailed. You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.


    Well I don't agree he has nailed anything. There is no such thing as the perfect solution and there is no point preaching that Thermal Stores are a perfect solution for every situation because neither you or Water Systems have produced any EVIDENCE to support your claims.

    Water Systems claims that using a thermal store is more efficient than a modulating boiler, with weather compensation, to supply space heating.
    He claims Cranfield have researched this but no one can find it and he will not provide a link to it.
    Does it exist?

    Given that this the GreenBuilding Forum energy efficiency is of high importance to most members therefore unless we get to the bottom the efficiency issue we are wasting our time.

    So let me ask one more time. Where is the link to the Cranfield Research?

    It is my view that a well designed heating system using a gas condensing boiler is likely to be more efficient measured over a season than the thermal store.
    A weather compensated boiler will produce flow temperatures at the temp appropriate for the heating demand determined by the outside temp.
    So when its mild outside the flow temperature can be very low so that return temperatures are low and condensing nearly always happens.
    With a modulating boiler, many of which will modulate down to 25% of rated max output cycling is also minimised.

    The Thermal Stores solution requires a body of water to kept at a static temperature to be used to produce space heating and DHW.
    According to Gledhill this should be kept at least at 70c - regardless of outside temperature.
    So there is continuous heat loss from this store which given its high temperature will be significant. So even where only low temperatures are required in the radiators the store will kept at a high temperature.

    There is also the question of return temperatures to the boiler which have never been answered.
    Gledhill quote 11c temp drop which gives a return temperature of 59c.
    Water Systems tells this out of date does not point us to an updated specification or an alternative product.

    Does one exist?

    A similar concept to thermal stores is used in modern district heating systems where a heat main is kept at a high temperatures and plate heat exchangers are used to supply space and dHW to individual properties. These require a flow temperature of 80c for the plate heat exchanger to provide the required performance.

    This seems to be a common concern about thermal stores which makes them LESS EFFICIENT in many situations.

    Water Systems will come back telling me to read all his posts again.

    For the last time provide some EVIDENCE of thermal store temperatures and boiler return temperatures or we will all just assume you have not got any.
    • CommentAuthorTuna
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Lots of strong opinions and SHOUTING in this thread.

    Clearly any given heating system will not be appropriate for all possible circumstances. If you only intend to heat your home and hot water with a condensing gas boiler then a thermal store or heat bank might be viewed as overkill. However I would point out that if your aim is to use just a condensing gas boiler, you're possibly in the wrong forum.

    If you intend to use a combination of heat sources (say solar, biomass and either gas or electricity as backup), particularly ones that are 'bursty' and perhaps even unpredictable, then a thermal store makes a lot of sense regardless of a few points of efficiency either way. For some forum posters, the obsession with numbers perhaps overrides practical considerations of how a system might be made to work in the real world.

    If your heat bank looses energy, I would hope that your home is sufficiently well insulated, and the heat bank is sited to keep that energy within the living envelope?

    As for the people requiring evidence and legal documents, it seems to me that the posts from those who are very happy with their heat banks / thermal stores speak for themselves. Good technology does the job required of it.

    So why are you all getting so angry at other people's decisions?
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Nigel, Where do you get the 80C temperature into the plate X from. Is this a perculiarity of the district system to which you refer? My plate X requires a MAXIMUM of 70C to produce piping hot water, (too hot). I understand a 5-10C diference is all that is required for DHW. Your district system would be producing 70+C at the taps....ouch!*?!
    Mike
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Tuna

    I totally agree that thermal stores have a very valid role and I would very seriously consider installing one myself and very much in the manner you describe.

    I think heat losses from high static temperatures are an issue and return temperatures to condensing boilers but as you say with biomass and multiple heat sources in particular they could well be a very good solution.

    However this thread is being dominated by someone who has more than a passing personal interest and is using the forum to promote the benefits of a technical solution to the detriment of other possible solutions.
    My objective is actually to see if the claims being made actually stack up. The evidence so far suggestions there are claims being made and no substantive information being provided to support those claims.

    In doing so does not denigrate the decisions others have taken for their own reasons to install Thermal Stores.
  8.  
    Hi,
    Couple of points.
    Store can be any temp you want. Its up to you its your store.
    Output from store for space heating can be weather compensated up and down iaw with weather. Probably easier to do this than it was to modulate gas supply.
    PlateX will give any temp right upto the primary input temp and obviously no more, but if the primary input is much higher than the secondary out put the PlateX physically will be more compact as its governed by the log mean temp difference.
    If you have a high store temp you'll (in theroy) use a smaller PlateX for the same power transfer, as the primary input and secondary output converge the PlateX design becomes much more longer and thinner instead of short and fat.
    Likewise you will use less volume flow through the compensated space heating mixer if you temper down from 80deg store temp to 65deg for the rad circuit, so if you have laoded with your wood boiler, you'll meter out this more slowly preserving the layering within the store.

    Cheers, Mike up North
  9.  
    Posted By: nigel
    Posted By: crusoeTo get back to the main thread of this debate, despite his undoubted ability to ruffle feathers, Water Systems has it pretty well-nailed. You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.


    Well I don't agree he has nailed anything. There is no such thing as the perfect solution and there is no point preaching that Thermal Stores are a perfect solution for every situation because neither you or Water Systems have produced any EVIDENCE to support your claims.


    We abundantly have. If you can't accept them for some illogical reason or - or just clearly do not understand, then you think you are right.


    Water Systems claims that using a thermal store is more efficient than a modulating boiler, with weather compensation, to supply space heating.
    He claims Cranfield have researched this but no one can find it and he will not provide a link to it.
    Does it exist?


    Do a google. A TS can be used with a modulation boiler using weather compensation. Read back on my posts and it gives the details - it has to be a dual temperature boiler, like Broag.


    It is my view that a well designed heating system using a gas condensing boiler is likely to be more efficient measured over a season than the thermal store.


    You are just plain guessing and think unvented cylinders are 100% safe and all that.


    The Thermal Stores solution requires a body of water to kept at a static temperature to be used to produce space heating and DHW.


    No. The stored CH water can vary to the outside temperature.


    According to Gledhill this should be kept at least at 70c - regardless of outside temperature.
    So there is continuous heat loss from this store which given its high temperature will be significant.


    There will be little from a Gledhill as their insulation is brilliant.


    There is also the question of return temperatures to the boiler which have never been answered.
    Gledhill quote 11c temp drop which gives a return temperature of 59c.
    Water Systems tells this out of date does not point us to an updated specification or an alternative product.


    A directly heated Gledhill will give very low temps and the boiler condense. If you size rads for a 20C drop then it will work well with a Gledhill.


    A similar concept to thermal stores is used in modern district heating systems where a heat main is kept at a high temperatures and plate heat exchangers are used to supply space and dHW to individual properties. These require a flow temperature of 80c for the plate heat exchanger to provide the required performance.

    This seems to be a common concern about thermal stores which makes them LESS EFFICIENT in many situations.


    District heating tends not to have TS's. Just individual stations in each home.


    For the last time provide some EVIDENCE of thermal store temperatures and boiler return temperatures or we will all just assume you have not got any.


    Read this thread again. All is there. We can;t just go around in circles because you can't grasp it.:bigsmile:
  10.  
    Posted By: TunaLots of strong opinions and SHOUTING in this thread.

    Clearly any given heating system will not be appropriate for all possible circumstances. If you only intend to heat your home and hot water with a condensing gas boiler then a thermal store or heat bank might be viewed as overkill.


    That is very wrong.
  11.  
    Posted By: jezza22Crusoe / WS, I've been (trying) to pick out the useful information from this thread as I'm seriously thinking of a new heat bank and have a couple of questions:

    1 - sounds like a heat bank with an external heat plate X is the way to go - can you drink the hot water generated as it is mains fed and not stored? If so, then a good way to fill the kettle and save electricity?


    Usually mains fed, but can be off a tank.


    2 - sounds like larger stores are better as they give you longer between re-heats - if I go for a 500 or 1000ltr store it will be heavy and need to be located on the ground floor - my concern is the time it might take to get hot water out of the plate X and upstairs to the bathrooms - is there anyway to minimise this as it is a waste of water plus a long dead-leg of hot water left to go cold between bathing?


    Fit in a secondary circulation loop, using two check-valves and a bronze pump and a pipe stat and timer.


    3- also, if the store is located at ground floor level and I have a WB with a boiler on the same level would it need a pump (lattdomat?) as I assume it could not be gravity fed?


    A vented T Store can be gravity fed.
    • CommentAuthorGBP-Keith
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Declare your interest (position) please 'Water Systems' as some are suspecting/reporting commercial interest!
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    This is a very disappointing thread.
    • CommentAuthorGBP-Keith
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Far too much quoting has made it difficult to read.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Agreed. I've heavily researched this topic and would probably be interested in some of the views. Unfortunately I don't have the time to wade through all the counter-quoting. Also there's not much referencing to external reviewed sources so a lot of it looks like heresay.
    • CommentAuthorcrusoe
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Nigel

    You are welcome to your opinion, of course. Equally, so am I, WS and other members. We may have those opinions, you will likely agree, based on our experience and/or research, our mistakes and our successes. Some will have opinions based on reading claims, others more from a practical, hands-on approach. But your disagreement doesn't change my opinion of WS' expertise. I don't know the man but don't have to in order to see that his comments largely make sense. In other areas I may beg to differ.

    And even the experts disagree, as I noted in an earlier post. So yes, you are right, there is no one best solution for everybody. Although there is a 'best solution' for every situation - but it takes a lot of experience and customer input to find it and then design and install it. I speak from long experience.

    What claims of mine are you interested in me substantiating? Can't speak for Cranfield data, nor efficiency of TS vs Condensing boilers c/w weather gear, though I have installed them since the mid-80s and am fitting one in a 4-house, mini-district scheme project on a holiday cottage site as I write.

    Define efficiency please - as in Gas Con + Weather being more efficient. What do you base your claims on? Bear in mind we are on 3G gas condensing - so a 1G unit fitted when I fitted my first TS would have had to be replaced twice in order to still be in tip-top order. Have you factored that into your efficiency costings? Also I have ripped out as many WC units as I ever installed, possibly more, as customers tell me (and I have never had one, so can;t speak from personal experience...) that they don't like them. Even IF they save money.

    You can Google me in a number of different fields. What about you? On what experience is your strongly held opinion based? What I am asking here is, that while many may see the Thermal Store and its derivatives as pointless - the topic of this thread - it may well be because they do not fit them, do not understand them, see no need for them, and view proponents of the technology as being a picnic sans a few sandwiches. In my opinion, this is equally as polemic a view as WS' pro-store stance.

    So getting too technical (read 'hard to follow') on what is a subjective and very individual topic to people in a thread like this does not always serve. It simply appears to polarize opinion on what is a useful technology...in some circumstances. In my experience, if people see features instead of benefit to them, they often don't take the argument on board.

    But as a long-term installer of TS technology - many different kinds - I admire the possible engineering simplicity of the principle, with some (!) of the benefits.

    An example: Plate exchangers are great bits of kit, fitted inside most combis, and are a stand-alone bolt-on to a TS ...in some cases. I do not advocate them every time. In Jezza22's case, as above, it sounds to me like he might be better to keep a separate DHW tank nearer to his bathroom drawoffs, avoiding both the dead legs and expense of installation and running costs of the secondary circ system. But we are talking principles only and I would have to see specifics before I could confirm that.

    Jezza22 - tell me do, that you're not the kind of guy who would drink his own bathwater.... :)) Would be happy to answer more specific questions.

    Regards

    Crusoe
    • CommentAuthorandy500
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    Dragging on a bit, this one isn’t it?

    I feel I should respond as Tom said a few pages back regarding my set-up…

    “30l/min is good, but it's not as good as an unvented cylinder.”

    So. It’s 30l/min at 45 deg rise because that’s the flow the shower is designed for, and that’s what I asked the store manufacturer (who supplied the plate heat exchanger) for.
    That’s 30l/min at what, 40 to 45 degC. So some of that 30l could well be blended cold water. What my accumulator pushes out, I have no idea, I’ve not measured it.
    But it’s enough to almost hurt under the kitchen tap. I can now bounce hot water (almost hot enough to brew tea with) clean out of the bottom of the kitchen sink and a good 8 feet away onto the kitchen floor if I give the heat exchanger’s thermostatic blending valve a tweak into the danger zone first, so it does the job regarding showers. Trust me.
    An unvented (with the same essential accumulator) would produce exactly the same effect, maybe even better, as a plate heat exchanger might have a slight restriction to flow? Not that I’ve noticed. But you’d be out of water pretty sharpish at 30 litres a minute using a 300l cylinder.
    So the 30 litres doesn’t depend on the technology, it’s what is pushing it through the system – an accumulator or a good mains supply. But we knew that. Didn’t we?

    Tom also said

    ”Two showers in the winter before your water gets chilly may be acceptable to you, but I think it may be totally unacceptable to others. It's nowhere near the performance of an unvented cylinder of comparable size!”

    It’s fine for us.
    That’s two long showers while the 15 or so radiators are all calling for heat.
    In the dead of winter.
    Incoming water rather cold.
    With a 3 speed shunt pump set to ‘slow’.
    I s’pose I could get the radiators to come on fifteen minutes earlier, turn the store ‘boiler off’ stat up to get to the design temp of 70-75 degC, or turn the shunt pump up to 2, or turn the ‘on’ stat up to get the boiler to fire a bit earlier in the store depletion cycle, but there’s no point, it does what we want as it is, without wasting too much gas.
    Or I could do a lockout as water systems suggested for the space heating – circ pump stops when hot water is demanded. But I can’t be bothered – it’s not an issue.
    You want better hot water for the days my wife washes her hair during the 2 weeks a year it’s a bit parky – get a bigger heat exchanger to suck the last little bit of energy out. Or a bald wife.
    The 5 degree store water to tap water transfer sounds right – it seems very efficient from here.
    As Cwatters says, it’ll tick over during summer at 55 degC or less, and perform fine shower/bath wise.
    Gledhill state they need 70 degrees/80 degrees/whatever. I would suggest their plate X is undersized?
    The stored water isn’t sprayed in your face with a store, so legionella isn’t quite so much of a problem (understatement!!) as a traditional cylinder.
    How long does an unvented take to recover it’s heat? I’ve just googled it. Took a while to stop laughing to be honest, but that’s not important.
    It’s 29 minutes to recover a 300l cylinder if you have taken 70% of the water and are replacing it with 15 degC water. I’m guessing there’d be a cold shower somewhere there.

    Tom also said

    “You have reinforced my view that small thermal (size now raised to 300l from 250l) are utterly pointless. You have a worse hot water system than an unvented tank in return for complexity”

    Complexity – yes, there are extra bits, but all off-the-shelf stuff. Any old flow switch, a standard circ pump, standard stats and a cheapo relay, erm, that’s it.
    Half of the extra bits are there to make the boiler cycling better – you’d do the same to any cylinder if the hot water performance could be maintained through a 20 degree storage range.
    Want to go green with an unvented? You’ll be needing weather comp, and, oh… complexity. And the damn thing will STILL come on at the whim of a roomstat.

    Thermal stores are crap, good, brilliant, and in between. Depends what you want.
    Gas boiler, a bit of solar and a regular plumber = unvented. They’re great.
    If you service your car and your boiler, get your cylinder done as well. If you can’t be bothered, well that’s just fine. In the UK, servicing is advised, same as being sensible on the stairs is advised.
    But hang on, do you want a wood burner as well? Or you want your boiler to last forever? Or use solar to help heat your house? Maybe low temp underfloor heating? That’s where the decision gets tricky. I can’t comment, because my wood and solar aren’t here yet, but as far as the store goes, It Is Good.

    Jezza22…
    1 – yep, it is mains water, not stored water, kettles are more than happy with it.

    2 – what WS or crusoe said – depends on the layout.

    3- you would still need a gravity heat dump (eg rads upstairs??) even with a laddomat – maybe a normally open failsafe valve to close off the heat dump rad when the laddomat is running?

    Regarding boiler return temps, my boiler shows 30-35 degrees up to 65 return at the end of a reheat. Most of the reheating is done at low return temps, mainly because the flow out from the boiler only just hits 82 (max) when the store stats call ‘enough’.
    It condenses, mostly.

    A little thing, but something I’m really impressed with is the space heating from stone cold. First thing in the morning when the programmable roomstats wake up, the radiators get hot. Quickly. And I mean within seconds, certainly full temperature within a minute or two. Not important in the scheme of things, but nice to have.

    Listen to crusoe, someone who fits the damn (unvented) things…

    “You can use a TS/HB?Accumulator/Buffer Tank/Thermal Battery - call it what you will - in most cases. It gives you the ability to connect many different types of appliances (JohnH - incl Solid fuel/ woodburning) and alter that mix to suit developing fuels and technologies.

    In short, it gives you OPTIONS for the future. It will save you money too.”

    Pointless ie without a point, a reason for being? No, that’s wrong. End of. See you again on page ten?
    • CommentAuthorbrig001
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2009
     
    I am new to this, but have a 12 year old TS (Albion Mainsflow) 250 litres, IIRC, but can check. I have found it poor at stratifying when only running radiators and/or UFH, but not bad when running DHW. I also have no idea of the total system efficiency - it is fed from a Baxi Solo boiler.

    I was hoping to learn something from this topic about thermal stores, for and against, but since I haven't got very far on this, I'll ask the question directly.

    The boiler is getting noisy and probably needs a new heat exchanger, so I was contemplating replacing the whole boiler for a nice shiny new one. Is it worth keeping the thermal store, or just get a combi? I suppose I could keep the store and just use it for solar in the future to pre-heat water to the combi (yes, I know there are issues with this), so it wouldn't be a total loss.

    I feel that the poor stratification (the comment rang true about small stores) would limit the total system efficiency if I kept it as it is, but if I used a combi, the firing losses could be more significant.

    Admin: This may not be the best place to ask this, so please move it if it makes more sense somewhere else.

    Thanks.
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press