Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    We will be having underfloor heating in our new bungalow, the pipes will be set in a 75mm thick screed over 150mm polystyrene insulation on a concrete slab. It will be run by an Air Source Heat Pump. I am getting lots of conflicting information over which type of screed is best - a traditional sand cement screed, or a modern non-cement based flowing screed.

    For our floor area (60m2) I realise the traditional screed will be cheaper, but this doesnt really comcern me if it means making a better choice.

    In particular, will one or the other be more responsive or make the system run more efficiently?

    I've done a little search on here but there doesnt seem to be a lot of information. Any input will be valued :smile:

    Jeff
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    Ideal screed would be semi dry ready mix screed with fibres well compacted and laid perfectly.
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    What I'm really interested in is not WHAT you think, but WHY you think that; what are your reasons for saying a traditional screed is better?

    For every person with an opinion, there's someone else with a conflicting opinion - so I need to analyse the facts rather than choose who to listen to, if you see what I mean.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    Simple,cheap, easy to repair, durable, non brittle, good feel underfoot, fibres help it stop cracking, goodly thermal mass, the list goes on

    High tech -- horrid, plasticky, impossible to take up, expensive opps no sorry very expensive, specialist to lay, poor feel,brittle?
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    As I said, cheap isnt really important in this particular subject. And I will be employing someone who knows what they're doing to install either system - so needing a specialist isnt important either.

    How can you say sand:cement is non-brittle - and then use 'plasticky' as a disadvantage of the modern system? Surely something based on cement is more brittle than something that isnt? And why does that matter anyway??

    You say sand:cement is 'easy to repair' and 'durable'. Surely these contradict each other? You say flowing screed is 'impossible to take up' - surely this means it's durable?

    Im interested in what you say about a 'poor feel' though? I dont really see how there could be any perceptible difference under say laminate flooring? Can you quantify this any further? And what is your actual experience with either/both systems?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    I ve never been able to afford high tech screed systems but have seen them elsewhere. Get prices then decide.

    Sand cement screed is slightly flexible with fibres, It is nice to be able to get screed up without trashing all the pipes -- not possible with high tech -- even more crucial for repairs etc

    under a laminate there will be little difference

    Usually high tech screed goes in a lot thinner and so tends to feel hollow.
  1.  
    Flowing anhydrite screeds give a nice smooth finish & can be made thinner, reducing the amount of material needed & increasing the floor to ceiling height. However, they need to be laid by a specialist team & the water content needs to be accurately controlled to ensure the correct balance of flowing properties, strength & drying time.

    If cement based tile adhesive is to be used then the floor needs to be sealed with a membrane or primer before tiles are laid. It is critical that the moisture content reaches ~0.5% before the membrane or primer is applied as the screed will not dry further after this has been done. This can take longer than a dry screed & 10-12 weeks is not uncommon (depending on water content, temperature, ventilation, etc). Alternatively, one of the specialist tiling membranes needs to be used:

    http://www.schluter.co.uk/2806.aspx

    We know this to our cost, as we'll need to move out of our new house so that the poorly laid anhydrite screed can be replaced with a dry screed. Removing the screed will unavoidably damage the insulation, so this will be replaced at the same time. The whole process is scheduled to take 15 weeks, but will probably take longer.

    David
  2.  
    Posted By: PikeyWe will be having underfloor heating in our new bungalow, the pipes will be set in a 75mm thick screed over 150mm polystyrene insulation on a concrete slab. It will be run by an Air Source Heat Pump.

    How are you sizing the heating system & the air source heat pump? If the house is not being left unoccupied for long periods, it makes sense to run the air source heat pump continuously or to use a thermal store & the thermal mass in the house to run the ASHP only during Economy 7 periods.

    Posted By: PikeyIn particular, will one or the other be more responsive or make the system run more efficiently?

    Putting the insulation below the slab & putting the underfloor heating pipes in the slab will greatly increase response times, but will allow you to make best use of the ASHP. It will also avoid the need for a screed, so the answer to your question would be "no screed at all".

    David
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    We had an initial SAP assessment done, and the company supplying our heat pump has sized it for us.

    When you say 'long periods' do you mean while we're at work or for days at a time?

    At the moment, we both work normal full time office jobs and have no children, so if we had a typical central heating system we'd have it on for an hour in the morning and then again for a few hours in the evening. I appreciate U/F/H is never going to work like that - but would it be more efficient to have a more responsive system to take advantage of the time we're not there, or a more massive slower responding system that keeps the house warm all the time, even when we're not there? I guess the more massive system would run the heat pump more efficiently, which would point to a traditional screed being the better option?
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    I'm considering easy-screed from Ready-mix with fibres. Seems to be midway between hi and lo tech. Was put off anhydrite a bit by need to seal/prime the surface before tiling. I see thinner as an advantage, less material and less time to dry out. However reading Tony's comments re semi-dry sand and cement maybe that would (as name implies) dry out faster although it is thicker. Metal or poly fibres in the mix reduce cracking and aid heat distribution from UFH I'm told.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    What are you putting on top of the screed and how well insulated is the building? I have oil fired wet UFH under a mix of stone tiles, carpet and engineered oak. House insulated to building regs standard. The running costs are reasonable but the flow temperatures needed to push the heat through the floor coverings is higher than I expected. If I was going to replace my oil boiler with ASHP I'd want to know that it was efficient at flow temperatures around 50C. I can't imagine my system working with flow temps down at 35C for example.

    I'd be interested to know what flow temperatures other people are using.

    Avoid aerated screed for obvious reasons.

    Install expansion joints where two areas of screed meet at doorways if you plan to tile either room with tiles or stone.
  3.  
    Posted By: PikeyAt the moment, we both work normal full time office jobs and have no children, so if we had a typical central heating system we'd have it on for an hour in the morning and then again for a few hours in the evening.

    I would ask the heat pump supplier to estimate the warm-up times with different screeds. You're unlikely to have as much excess power available as a gas/oil boiler might provide. This combined with the heat capacity of the screed may lead to excessive warm-up times. You'll also need to be careful with your floor coverings.

    What U values & airtightness are you aiming for?

    David
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    Air-tightness, er, dont know :shamed:

    We have 150mm Celotex in the roof, 200mm 'EcoWool' insulation between the timber studs in the wall, and 150mm polystyrene in the floor. Our SAP assessment shows U values of 0.17, 0.08, and 0.23 for the roof, floor and walls respectively. If that helps (?)
  4.  
    With those U values you should be OK with an ASHP. I would go for more insulation in the roof, but that's going off-topic.

    If I wanted to use intermittent heating then my main concern would be warm-up times. If the only issue is the thermal mass of the screed, you can always compensate by setting the heating to turn-on a couple of hours before you get home & turn-off a couple of hours before you go to bed. However, combine this with the wrong floor covering or an ASHP which has marginal capacity & the whole thing is likely to become unmanageable.

    Has the ASHP been selected? Could you give us the model number, power rating & the surface area of the floor to be screeded? Will the ASHP heat any other areas? Will it also heat domestic hot water? How is the system to be managed/zoned? Have the heat pump company suggested a thermal store?

    David
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010 edited
     
    Posted By: PikeyI would ask the heat pump supplier to estimate the warm-up times with different screeds.

    And just how do you think they will know that?
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    Its a 5kW Mitsubishi EcoDan unit, floor area is 60m2, it will also do the hot water yes. I dont think we've got room for a thermal store.

    Very grateful for help so far :cool:
  5.  
    Posted By: DantenzAnd just how do you think they will know that?

    If they don't know how to calculate it then they shouldn't be dimensioning the system.

    It's a simple question of power input versus specific heat capacity. The underfloor heating pipe diameter plus the required pipe coverage for the screed gives the screed thickness. The screed thickness times the floor area gives the screed mass. The screed mass times screed specific heat capacity times power input gives rate of change of temperature.

    Clearly they will need the data for each of the candidate screeds, but this should be readily available. If they're not willing to do it then I would recommend finding a heating services engineer who is willing to do it.

    David
  6.  
    Posted By: PikeyIts a 5kW Mitsubishi EcoDan unit, floor area is 60m2, it will also do the hot water yes.

    On the information available it's difficult to estimate the typical temperature drop while you're at work during the day. If we assume the temperature drops 10 degrees in mid-winter then taking screed data from the following site:

    http://www.ecoscreed.co.uk/

    An 50mm anhydrite screed will take around 2.35 hours to get back-up to temperature:

    Floor area 60 m2
    Screed thickness 50 mm
    Screed mass 5550 kg
    Screed specific heat capacity 762 J / kg.K
    Delta T 10°C
    Power 5000W
    Warm-up time 2.35h

    A 65mm sand & cement screed will take around 4.72 hours:

    Floor area 60 m2
    Screed thickness 65 mm
    Screed mass 8580 kg
    Screed specific heat capacity 991 J / kg.K
    Delta T 10°C
    Power 5000W
    Warm-up time 4.72h

    Remember this is just the time taken to get the screed back-up to temperature after a 10°C drop, it ignores the heat capacity of the room, heat lost during the heating process, the affect of any floor coverings, power lost due to the ASHP COP dropping in cold weather, power lost to radiators upstairs & power lost to domestic hot water heating. So the time to get the room air up to temperature will be considerably longer.

    I would recommend using the anhydrite screed (with an appropriate separation membrane if tiling) or switching to 24 hour heating.

    David
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2010
     
    Posted By: davidfreeborough
    Posted By: DantenzAnd just how do you think they will know that?

    If they don't know how to calculate it then they shouldn't be dimensioning the system.

    It's a simple question of power input versus specific heat capacity. The underfloor heating pipe diameter plus the required pipe coverage for the screed gives the screed thickness. The screed thickness times the floor area gives the screed mass. The screed mass times screed specific heat capacity times power input gives rate of change of temperature.

    Clearly they will need the data for each of the candidate screeds, but this should be readily available. If they're not willing to do it then I would recommend finding a heating services engineer who is willing to do it.

    David

    No, it's not simple at all, and seeing as you pretend to know so much about it why ask a heat pump manufacturer to determine the heat up time for various screed types..it's not their area of expertise neither is it in their interest to imdemnify such a prediction.
  7.  
    Posted By: Dantenz

    No, it's not simple at all, and seeing as you pretend to know so much about it why ask a heat pump manufacturer to determine the heat up time for various screed types..it's not their area of expertise neither is it in their interest to imdemnify such a prediction.

    Datenz, I found your response dismissive, unconstructive & rather insulting. I am not "pretending to know so much about it", I am merely sharing my time & my knowledge of 'O' level Physics in trying to help Jeff sort through the conflicting information he is receiving.

    Jeff stated that the "company supplying our heat pump has sized it for us". The screed forms part of the heating system in the same way that a radiator would, so any attempt to size the system should take this into account.

    There are too many ASHPs being installed today in inappropriate situations. The whole heating system needs to be designed together with the building fabric if we are to see the benefits. It makes sense for the company sizing the system to do this, but as I said earlier "If they're not willing to do it then I would recommend finding a heating services engineer who is willing to do it".

    I am not saying that the heat pump company should indemnify the screed choice, but if they ignore its affect in dimensioning the system then Jeff should get professional advice from a heating services engineer.

    David
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    Ecovision Systems in Tetbury are the people supplying & installing the heat pump, unvented hot water cylinder and pipework, and underfloor heating. They did get back to me late yesterday to say they would recommend a 50mm anhydrite screed because the warm-up times will be faster, and the curing time will be shorter.

    I am swayed towards a thinner free-flowing screed to be honest. The only thing that concerns me (slightly) is will its faster response time make the heat pump itself keep switching on and off every 15 minutes to maintain a constant temperature while we are there?
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    Appreciate your calcs by the way :smile:
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    The whole philosophy of wanting fast response and underfloor heating is fundamentally unsound. Ideal application is on 24/7.

    Once warm the house will respond to the thermostat according to it heat loss the greater the rate of heat loss and the more air leaks the more it will need to come on.

    It will be slow to respond and could well overshoot the thermostat setting -- how about temperature setback programming (chronostat? )
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    So running it 24/7 will cost less than having a faster responding system and turning it off/down while we're at work/sleeping?
    • CommentAuthorHelenS
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    we're using this company: http://www.ecoscreed.co.uk/about.asp

    although we don't have underfloor heating, I remember being told that the fact that the sand is replaced in this product by glass vastly improves u/f heating response times...
  8.  
    Posted By: PikeySo running it 24/7 will cost less than having a faster responding system and turning it off/down while we're at work/sleeping?

    Intermittent heating will save money overall because the amount of heat lost through the floor, walls & roof is proportional to the temperature difference. If the temperature in the room is lower then less heat will be lost. Running it 24x7 will always cost more, but given the response times, it may the only practical way to maintain the desired temperature when the house is occupied.

    As Tony points out, when intermittent heating is turned-on the 2-4 hour delay before the screed reaches temperature can lead to the room temperature 'over-shooting' the desired temperature. This affect can be reduced or eliminated by using programmable thermostats which more subtley vary the temperature versus time, by embedding thermostats in the screed &/or by using weather compensation. Weather compensation varies the flow temperature from the ASHP, so that in warmer weather the flow temperature is lower, reducing the risk of over-shoot or over-heating.

    Talk to the heat pump supplier about the control options. As a minimum he should be able to provide a programmable thermostat which allows the temperature to be set-back, to say 16°C, while you're asleep or at work, reducing the time taken to re-heat & reducing the risk of over-shoot.

    David
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2010
     
    Helen, do you have an idea what eco-screed costs? thanks
    • CommentAuthorPikey
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2010 edited
     
    Dont you want a screed to be a good thermal conductor though? Im not sure the reasoning and the maths on that Ecoscreed website is entirely sound!

    Or maybe I dont fully understand :shamed:
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeMar 12th 2010
     
    Posted By: davidfreeborough
    Posted By: Dantenz

    No, it's not simple at all, and seeing as you pretend to know so much about it why ask a heat pump manufacturer to determine the heat up time for various screed types..it's not their area of expertise neither is it in their interest to imdemnify such a prediction.

    Datenz, I found your response dismissive, unconstructive & rather insulting.David

    Please accept my apologies David, It was wrong of me to say what I did. I just get rather frustrated some times at what might seem to be by some, as a perfectly resonable simple question and yet the question is almost impossible to answer. I say this because I am often at the receiving end of such questions where the answers are not always black or white or even determinable.
  9.  
    Posted By: DantenzPlease accept my apologies David, It was wrong of me to say what I did. I just get rather frustrated some times at what might seem to be by some, as a perfectly resonable simple question and yet the question is almost impossible to answer. I say this because I am often at the receiving end of such questions where the answers are not always black or white or even determinable.

    No problem, I can understand the frustration. We need to find better ways of designing houses & heating systems which give people more certainty over finished performance. We can't load the whole problem on the builder or on the individual suppliers. In electronics we have the concept of a systems architect or systems engineer who is responsible for making sure the entire system of component parts performs as expected. I think we need something similar in building to ensure building services & building fabric perform together as expected. Following the Passivhaus approach is one way of achieving this, but this doesn't help if you're just having a heat pump fitted.

    David
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press