| Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
|
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: SteamyTeaI don't feel I have to defend myself herehttps:///forum114/extensions/Vanillacons/smilies/happy/rolling.gif" alt="
" title="
" >
Posted By: djhTo see what John is talking about, google Lloyd Tanner Friction Boiler
I've no idea whether or how well it works.
Posted By: billtSounds like another lunatic perpetual motion machine.
"Lloyed Tanner, on the other hand, has built a device in his garage that can boil water and create steam pressure using the heat of FRICTION... you know, the same thing that lights matches, and overheats our automobile brakes. His prototype presses pieces of oak 4 by 4s onto a metal wheel being spun by an electric motor. The wheel soon becomes a spinning "hot plate" that can heat water in a boiler to create steam pressure that can run a generator to supply electricity to run not only the motor turning the wheel, but everything in his house as well."
Posted By: renewablejohnThere is no claim of getting more energy out then you put in.
Posted By: billtThis device claims to be able to both run itself and generate excess energy without an external energy source, and hence violates well understood physical laws.
Posted By: djhThe device consumes the wood. Until I see an analysis that either claims the chemical energy of the wood forms the energy source, or a counter-analysis that proves it cannot, I'll keep my mind open. I haven't yet seen any proof that it violates physical laws. Nor any that it does perform net useful work.
Posted By: renewablejohnIf you want to look at reasons why it should work I suggest looking at Steam electricity and the work carried out by Faraday in respect of Friction
Posted By: Gavin_Athey both seem to relate to an electric charge being produced directly by friction within steam itselfThat would be static electricity then.
Posted By: Gavin_Athey both seem to relate to an electric charge being produced directly by friction within steam itself, which doesn't seem to have any relevance at all to the previous statements you made.
Farraday "3.The electricity is due entirely to the friction of particles of water which the steam carries forward against the surrounding solid matter of the passage (He devised various jets - has had Armstrong - for the water to impinge upon)."
What's the relevance to the situation you're describing?
Posted By: djhTo see what John is talking about, google Lloyd Tanner Friction Boiler
I've no idea whether or how well it works.
Posted By: renewablejohnusing that stream will increase the overall efficiency of the system.