Mon, 18 May 2026 04:18:53 +0100 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/ Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191809#Comment_191809 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191809#Comment_191809 Tue, 17 Dec 2013 22:25:58 +0000 CWatters
http://www.renewableuk.com/en/publications/reports.cfm

Only last Friday at a public inquiry a noise expert told everyone it wasn't possible to measure EAM, nor set a limit or draft an acceptable planning condition. What a difference three days makes.]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191870#Comment_191870 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191870#Comment_191870 Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:45:00 +0000 ted
Colin, do you have a copy of the recent email from Mike Stigwood on EAM?

And can you name that expert'? Was it Andy McKenzie, Matthew Cand or Andrew Bullmore by any chance?]]> https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191927#Comment_191927 https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7563&Focus=191927#Comment_191927 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:58:43 +0000 windy lamb Even at a Planning Meeting on Tues 17th the Planning Officers were saying that an AM condition was probably unenforceable (12 x 145m turbines) they did have the sense to cover themselves by , I think, saying that if a condition could be drafted it would be. Well now they have one the industry accepts! Interesting to see if it appears in the consent documents.]]>