Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorpmusgrove
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2011 edited
     
    I have started to hear rumours that the FIT at the present rates may come to an end before the end of March 2012. This is due to the rising cost of electricity bills, the realisation that the electorate are waking up to the fact that some of this rise is due to the increase they see in the number of PV arrays, and the fact that the return on capital on those arrays is the best available in the UK today. Anyone else heard any rumours?
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2011 edited
     
    yes , but only on forums like this and navitron
    Ted mentioned it . he seems clued up and straight up.
    Reduction of next tariff level and as you say possibly reduction prior to date set ?
    or is it just a bit of gamesmanship by the industry and regulators etc.
    getting people to rush to install before clients drop off as tariff drops as planned in march
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2011
     
    I am aware that in the past 24 hours many of you have received information that FIT is under an imminent fast track review and may be cut to as low as 9 pence across the board. The BPVA Board of Directors and I have been in contact with DECC officials to clarify this and we have been re-assured behind reasonable doubt that these are unsubstantiated rumours. I am sure that you agree firstly, this kind of news at this crucial time has a negative impact on the whole industry, it is counter productive and also may give ideas to DECC!?

    BPVA chairman email yesterday.



    decc reply, a bit none committal actually, but doesn't say anything like 'all options are on the table' which would have been the type of wording they'd have used if they were seriously considering ending it.


    Our position hasn’t changed. All tariffs in the scheme are being considered in the Comprehensive Review and we will be consulting on proposals later this year. We’ve made clear that tariffs will remain unchanged until April 2012 unless the review indicates the need for greater urgency.

    The FITs scheme is paid for by energy consumers through their bills and has a fixed budget. The scheme is proving popular with households and we’re continually monitoring the take up of the scheme to make sure that we stick to budget.

    Sorry we can’t provide more detail that that at the moment.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2011
     
    I doubt there is enough PV installed in the UK to make a significant difference to energy bills. Wind is another matter. I think there are good grounds to cut the FIT for onshore and increase it for offshore.

    We are seeing planning applications in low wind speed areas now. In one case PP was granted 3-4 years ago and it's still not built. It's thought they are waiting for bigger turbines to become available/permitted as nearby existing wind farm was operating below 20% last I heard.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2011
     
    Posted By: Gavin_A The scheme is proving popular with households and we’re continually monitoring the take up of the scheme to make sure that we stick to budget.


    That was the reason given for cutting farm scale PV.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2011
     
    What I don't really understand is this concept of 'budget', if we are all paying towards the cost of FITs though our electrical usage, national demand sets the 'budget' if worked out as a fraction of demand. If it is capped so that the consumers contributions are capped at an arbitrary financial level, as soon as we reach that level (and it must be known), we know that the market is saturated (as far as incentives are concerned). Should be easy enough to work out where that point is and where we are now.
    Anyone got the numbers?
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeOct 20th 2011
     
    There are a few reasons why the FiT spend is considered part of the government budget.

    DECC control the rates and the scheme is administered via OFGEM and the EU have sanctioned it under state aid rules. These all bring it within the government spending review. HM Treasury also have specific controls over what DECC can and can't do. Explained here -
    http://hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/control_framework_decc250311.pdf

    The announced budget figures for FiTs were in the DECC fast track review consultation document -
    http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/Consultations/fits-review/fits-fast-track-government-response---final.pdf - bottom of page 4.

    These are the figures that DECC are referring to when they talk about take up above expectation/budget.

    The total spend allowed for 2011/12 is £80 million and £161 million for 2012/13.

    Actual FiTs payments were £10 million in just Q1 of 2011/12. But there have been significant levels of PV installs since then, including most of the solar farms that did manage to get built before the fast-track review tariff change deadline.
  1.  
    Can someone please confirm these potential cuts would only effect new registrations to the scheme, I assume there is no talk of cutting the FIT payment rates for existing installations?
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011 edited
     
    Posted By: tedThe total spend allowed for 2011/12 is £80 million and £161 million for 2012/13.

    Actual FiTs payments were £10 million in just Q1 of 2011/12. But there have been significant levels of PV installs since then, including most of the solar farms that did manage to get built before the fast-track review tariff change deadline.

    hmm...

    taking that £10million qt 1 figure, and extrapolating it into the latest monthly figures given in the article at the link below, I think we probably are heading for an early cut.

    There was roughly double the installed capacity in qt 2 to qt 1 - 250MWp vs 140 MWp at the mid point of the quarters, so it'd be a reasonable assumption that the FIT spend in qt2 would be around £18-20 million. So that's £28-30 million for the first half of the year, and £36-40 million already built in for the second half of the year, leaving only £10-14 million for new installed capacity in the 2nd half of the year... but everyone knows there's going to be a big rush before the FIT rates are due to change in April, so there looks to be no possible way that the FIT scheme can stay within it's pitiful £80million a year limit this year without some fairly rapid and drastic action.

    I'd not be surprised if this decision get's taken out of DECCs hands and the treasury force the issue if I'm anywhere close on my figures, as the treasury has reserved the right to intervene since the Comprehensive spending review that first set the limits.

    http://www.solarpowerportal.co.uk/news/industry_fears_mount_in_the_lead_up_to_the_comprehensive_fit_review_5478/

    utter incompetence on DECCs part to have allowed it to get to this stage despite the signs of this impending issue have been pretty obvious since the CSR a year ago, and certaintly since the fast track review when a significant proportion of the responses were from installers calling for rapid across the board cuts of 20-30% in the FIT rate rather than simply slashing the rate for large scale installations.

    All slashing that rate did was move most of the finance that would have gone to the big installations into the rent your roof domestic sector to further overheat it.
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    Having worked in the public sector for most of my career, I can confirm that the Treasury ALWAYS reserve the right to either enforce limits or to take back funding mid-FY. For example, the last programme I managed before I retired kept costs down. A year before completion (and after I'd already handed by a few million of the risk contingency) the Treasury announced they were short of cash (because of high Afghanistan and Iraq expenditure) and just removed another £20M from the budget mid-FY. Their deal (non-negotiable) was that we could borrow back the £20M from them at normal commercial rates if we needed it.

    Talk about shopkeeping gone mad. Someone thought it was sensible for one public body to borrow from another and pay interest from tax revenue, adding to the burden on the taxpayer, all in the name of creative accounting.................

    In short, FITs could be suspended at very short notice if the Treasury demand it, and not just because it's running out of its agreed budget. No compensation would be paid to anyone caught in the middle of an installation if previous policy changes like this are anything to go by.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    Not sure if I can post this..
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011 edited
     
    Posted By: JSHarrisTalk about shopkeeping gone mad. Someone thought it was sensible for one public body to borrow from another and pay interest from tax revenue, adding to the burden on the taxpayer, all in the name of creative accounting.................


    The same is true of the FITs revenue being so generous that individuals can borrow money to install the kit and have some cash left over. Be nice if the Auto industry had a similar scheme, I would quite happily borrow some cash for a new Kia Rio (88 MPG, I am not greedy) and smirk at all the other drivers filling up who are paying for me to drive. Think of it in that terms and it is barmy.
    The saving grace is that if the scheme does cut back on payments to existing systems then, the systems are still in place generating power (green secure power if you like). The original owner may not be there but the kit is still doing its job. Just has a new market value.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011 edited
     
    And retrospective action is not the way to get new market participants and investments.

    For anyone other than government it's called breach of contract.

    Rgds

    Damon
  2.  
    Yes, we were going to invest a new system in next months and everyone said that the rate is fixed for 25 years, there is no way the government can change it, it would be breach of contract! The worst case would be that in Apri or maybe before it seems that the rate would be reduced for new installs. Is the feeling that they really would go as far as reducing existing systems rates not just for new ones, it seems a massive own goal in terms of encouraging green investment, no-one will ever trust such schemes again :-(
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    I seem to remember that they have a clause that allows them to change the terms at any time. More an own goal for the RE industry than the government as the government has changed flavour. But it is all speculation at the moment.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    Posted By: Phil.Chaddah-DukeYes, we were going to invest a new system in next months and everyone said that the rate is fixed for 25 years, there is no way the government can change it, it would be breach of contract! The worst case would be that in Apri or maybe before it seems that the rate would be reduced for new installs. Is the feeling that they really would go as far as reducing existing systems rates not just for new ones, it seems a massive own goal in terms of encouraging green investment, no-one will ever trust such schemes again :-(

    I really can't see them changing the rate for existing systems. They'd destroy all credibility and trust for all their renewables support across the board, so FIT, RHI and ROC would all be dead in the water, as would the career of the minister in charge etc.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeOct 21st 2011
     
    DECC already has severely damaged its credibility more than once with early adopters, like me. The latest little wheeze being to say that I can't paid for FiTs between installation, and commissioning by a third-party MCS installer, when I have allowed my installation to be used by a new putative MCS installer to get their accreditation. I'm just working up to writing to my MP and the minister. Talk about biting the hand that feeds, Big Society and all that.

    Rgds

    Damon
  3.  
    Posted By: Phil.Chaddah-DukeCan someone please confirm these potential cuts would only effect new registrations to the scheme, I assume there is no talk of cutting the FIT payment rates for existing installations?


    I've heard various DECC officials and ministers speaking a number of times, and all of them have assured the audience that they won't be cutting FIT payment rates for existing installations, so my feeling is that's pretty safe.

    Posted By: pmusgroveThis is due to the rising cost of electricity bills, the realisation that the electorate are waking up to the fact that some of this rise is due to the increase they see in the number of PV arrays, and the fact that the return on capital on those arrays is the best available in the UK today. Anyone else heard any rumours?


    While the return on capital is one aspect of what's driving the change, it's not all. As Ted says, there's now a budget for the feed-in tariff, set in the government's spending plan. If it overspends, DECC has to cough up the difference, and there's no slack in it's budget. A steady degression in the rate has always been planned as the market gears up and economies of scale come in, with the aim that eventually it doesn't need subsidy.

    As originally set out, the FiT was intended to give 6-8% ROI. Due to the significant falls in the price of panels people are getting much, much more than that, so it's been known for a long time that there's going to be a fairly significant reduction from 1 April 2012. However, now rumours are circulating that the comprehensive review might 'deem it urgent' and slash the rate before April. It's difficult to know how much credibility to give to this, but the expectation was that 86MW of PV would be installed under the FiT in the year to 31 March 2012. By the end of September 316MW had been installed. That's quite a significant difference!
  4.  
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/oct/20/renewable-energy-subsidies-slashed
    Does anyone have information on where straw combustion fits into the new proposals for renewables subsidy rate. It was previously detailed as waste which would now appear to put it into low band.
    Thanks in anticipation
    Brian W
    • CommentAuthorSlowmo45
    • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2011
     
    The RH PP £15m will not be fully allocated unless there is a significant and unexpected uptake.

    Would DECC be minded to try and re-allocate to the FiT fund?

    The renewable heat industry has struggled ever since FiT was launched as most householders considering a 'green makeover' would naturally favour solar PV.

    It would be an enormous kick in the teeth but nothing would no surprise me.

    What is crystal clear is that DECC is far more worried about upsetting the Treasury than the renewables industry.
  5.  
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/oct/25/consumers-solar-panels-subsidies
    Interesting comments
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2011
     
    Any body else heard any whisperings of a gov. statement tomorrow outlining the reduction in FIT to take place end December & the rate to be cut by 50% post then.
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2011
     
    heard such whisperings / read it in a couple of places as rumours, but no idea of the truth of it.

    I'm hoping they'll stagger any such cut so maybe 25% in Jan, 25% in April or 30% in Jan, 10% in April, 10% in September.

    I'd even take that, then 10% every 6 months or something, rather than just a blanket 50% cut in december.

    If they do that, then I'd expect to see a lot of companies going bankrupt who'd already invested in new staff, training, equipment and other overheads in order to meet the anticipated big upsurge in demand in Feb / March who'd have been relying on those 2 months of additional installations to build up cash reserves for the period after the feed in tariff cut. We're in that position to some extent, but I've deliberately not over extended myself too much I hope as I thought something along these lines might have been on the cards.

    If they stagger it, then it at least gives the potential for companies to still pick up work in these months. If they don't, then a large proportion of potential customers will hold off until nearer the next fit reduction boundary in the hope of further price reductions. It's also going to mean we're going to be at our most busy at the worst possible time of year for installing solar, in which case I reckon I'll spend January stood outside DECC and the treasury lobbing snowballs at them or something given that I'll have nothing else more useful to do.

    interesting times anyway, and hopefully wiser heads will prevail.
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2011
     
    Don't know how much truth there is in it but the reason why the tariff is being cut by so much so soon is because the cost of the equipment has fallen considerably. And yet, those installing PV are not passing on these reductions to the customer and are making a fortune.
  6.  
    £10k for a 4 kWp is now becoming more common , after costs, to do a professional job, profit might not be as much as presumed
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2011
     
    Our prices, and the prices of the vast majority of our competitors have dropped by maybe 30% in the last year, and our margins per job have if anything slightly decreased, but we've also had a big increase in our cost base in terms of training up and employing new installation and admin staff, warehouse, office, equipment etc needed to just meet the rapidly increasing demand.

    I've no problem with the rate being cut though, in fact I support it, and along with around 30% of respondents to the fast track review, before the summer suggested they needed to apply an across the board cut of 20-30% in September or January instead of just slashing the rates for the over 50kW stuff.

    The reason DECC might be being forced to consider a big cut by the treasury is entirely due to them ignoring this advice, meaning the market's overheated massively, far more installations have been done than they anticipated, and they're almost certainly going to breach the treasury imposed spending limit of £80 million for the year. Their decision to slash the rates for large installations has mostly only had the effect of ensuring the majority of that money has been switched to rent your roof schemes instead due to the massively high returns DECC left in place for the under 50KW systems when they killed off the top end.
    • CommentAuthorDantenz
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2011
     
    Yep, just heard it on CH4 news; climate change minister Greg Barker announces 50% cut in FIT. The 100,000 schemes already in place are costing too much. A statement also made in the news brief, I quote "solar is not worth it, not with our weather, the money is better spent on wind & wave power".
    • CommentAuthorwindyboy
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2011
     
    Just seen an article on Channel 4 news tonight giving a pretty strong hint that in the next couple of days an announcement will be made on FIT'S by DECC confirming a heavy reduction on SOLAR PV, wind seems to be a bit "wooly" at the moment..........I,m sure we'll all know by Monday !!!!!!! Typical government......lead everyone up the garden path and then shut the gate.....remember HCR's.....lots of people changed careers,spent £10k on training and then the government (Labour in this case) made the HCR's optional,not mandatory.....end of new career !!!!!!! Cheers everyone.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeOct 27th 2011
     
    I've only just got planning permission (just a few days ago).
    Any idea how much time I've got to finish the install?
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press