<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Poorest performing Wind Turbine</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 21:37:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Poorest performing Wind Turbine</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155611#Comment_155611</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155611#Comment_155611</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 21:19:13 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>gustyturbine</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Not FIT for industrial turbines ROC's. But no different to any other form of generation that was growing.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Poorest performing Wind Turbine</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155657#Comment_155657</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155657#Comment_155657</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:50:46 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jms452</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<blockquote ><cite >Posted By: tony</cite>My local lot are claiming that the inland based wind turbines in our area are efficient and that we should have more of them, I dont agree as the one we have would be much better sited on on a hillside somewhere nearer the coast same capital cost, hugely better output.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Why does it have to be either or? there are benefits to geographically spreading your turbines out.<br /><br />To pick a slightly bizzare analogy wall insulation has a better payback than decent glazing but few would argue this was either or.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Poorest performing Wind Turbine</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155661#Comment_155661</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9499&amp;Focus=155661#Comment_155661</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:34:56 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>windy lamb</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[We've been here before. It's all about appropriate developments both in geographical area and size of turbine. The bigger the turbine the further off shore it should be.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>