Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2007
     
    I was looking at pricing on the web recently and a typical 1-1.5KW PV system was quoted at £8500 installed. That system might provide 20% of my electricity... But then I worked out that £8500 could be used to pay the green tarrif rate on ALL my electricity for around 20 years at todays rates. That would seem to be a better deal for the planet.

    Apart from obvious things like inflation, am I missing something here?

    Is it possible to justify Photo voltaics?
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2007
     
    If you justify everthing in term of 'payback' to you as an individual then possibly not. But then the same goes for almost any other houshold purchase if viewed through the appropriate pair of spectacles.

    If you subscribe to the doomy end of "peak oil' todays rates might seem a distant memory in a few years time and you may be quids in (or at least have enough electricity to watch daytime TV!). Aslo it may be, due to peak oil, that solar panels are very hard to come by, so again you could be ahead.

    If you are keen to be green to the level of £8500 you might consider what the sum could achieve in terms of less sexy alternatives like better insulating/draft proofing your house to a very high level.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2007
     
    Your quote includes a healthy profit margin for the retailer/installer. That said, pv is expensive because demand is geat and supply is limited. New production facilities are being built all over the world but demand is growing faster. In Germany the government has 'feed-in tariffs' that require electricity companies to pay you for your surplus power at a pretty generous rate. This makes installing domestic pv in Germany much more attractive.
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2007 edited
     
    http://www.buildingforafuture.co.uk/spring06/greenelec.pdf
    Hi Cwatters
    This is worth a read
    It gives another view on green tariffs

    perhaps money not well spent ?

    Jim

    ps, this article is a bit clearer ,
    http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/2006/03/green-electricty-illusion.html
    • CommentAuthorguyc
    • CommentTimeDec 10th 2007
     
    Here are some good real world figures for a 1.8kw peak system - http://www.solarious.co.uk/PVSolar.html - they are getting around 1600kWh per year.

    So with a grant you might get around £160pa of electricity for around £6000 spent. So although not particularly great in payback terms, at least it is the same ballpark as simply investing the money in the bank. It does seem that if the price of solar PVs continues to drop, than it could become a very good option. Think i read that US prices are around $4 per peak watt and if it can get down to $1 per peak watt then it become cost effective energy generation. Some predictions put us only a decade away from $1/watt.

    But as skywalker points out that money might better buy you things to reduces your energy consumption. Consider the best energy efficient products ("The latest fridge could save two thirds of the energy used by a ten year old fridge, which adds up to about £35 a year" - www.uk-energy-saving.com). Maybe solar hot water would be worth considering.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeDec 11th 2007
     
    My main point wasn't so much about the payback but rather the best use of capital to save the planet. It seem it's better to buy 100% green electricity than to try and make it on a small scale yourself by quite a margin. I'll have a look at all the recommended links.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007 edited
     
    Just now it's hard to buy 100% green electricity because demand is greater than supply. It's best to buy electricity from Ecotricity as they are the only firm that both retails electricity and is a 100% green generator. They sell more electricity than they generate but the profit they make is invested in building more turbines.

    It is doubtful whether the price the customer pays for solar pv will come down much in the near future. Although production costs are falling as the technology improves and factories are integrated and scaled up, demand is going to remain higher than supply. It's like oil that only costs $20 a barrel to produce but sells for $90. We are working at the limit of production capacity.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    Is it possible to justify Photo voltaics?

    From the studies that I have undertaken, No, it is not possible to justify photovoltaics on an environmental basis relative to other things that most people could do with their capital. If you invest in photovoltaics, then you do so to help add to the volume and possibly bring down the cost for other people later in the cycle.

    In my opinion, If you take the view that we will end up with Nuclear power by 2050, then the best way of reducing the requirement for that type of power would be to invest in heat loss reduction or solar (heat) gathering. If you take the view that we may not end up with Nuclear power, then Photovoltaics may be a worthwhile altruistic investment.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    The green tariffs are generally less beneficial than they would make you believe.

    All electicity suppliers are obliged to source 10% of their production by 2010, with a phased target up to that point. If they do not they have to pay a penalty or they can transfer excess renewables generation by buying ROC's(Renewble Obligation Certificates). As you can imagine suppliers like Good Energy have rather more ROC's than they need. So what they do is sell the excess for something like 4.5p/Kwh. I understand that they currently sell about 95% of their ROC's.

    The net effect therefore of buying from Good Energy is very little as they will effectively sell their ROC's and reduce the need for other suppliers to generate their own renewables.
    If they didnt do this they would have to charge about 15Kwh for their electricity which no-one would buy.

    Therefore I cannot see any benefit in buying from Good Energy as it does not increase the market for renewables.

    I do not know of any supplier that sells green electricity that is genuinely increasing the supply of renewable electricity which would not have happened anyway under the renewables obligation.

    For that reason if you want to improve things over and above the renewables obligation you have to do it yourself.
    • CommentAuthorskywalker
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    What a positive thread! I'm sorry for my part in the negativity.

    I think if I had a very well insulated airtight house with solar water etc and still had enough money left I would fit solar PV. But I guess, for me, that is where it lies; at the end of a long list of less sexy, mostly invisible when completed, energy efficiency measures.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    >I do not know of any supplier that sells green electricity that is genuinely increasing the supply of renewable electricity which would not have happened anyway under the renewables obligation.

    Then you don't know Dale Vince and and his firm, Ecotricity.
  1.  
    Unless you're incredibly disciplined, the best way to reduce electricity consumption is to go off grid - it becomes MUCH more precious when you gather it yourself from wind/hydro/PV etc. and rather forces the hand in taking energy conserving measures.

    In this scenario it seems that PV can play a useful part in a mix of renewables, enabling a more consistent supply in varied weather conditions.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007 edited
     
    Posted By: biffvernon>I do not know of any supplier that sells green electricity that is genuinely increasing the supply of renewable electricity which would not have happened anyway under the renewables obligation.

    Then you don't know Dale Vince and and his firm, Ecotricity.


    Yes I do actually as I transferred my supply from Good Energy to Ecotricity a couple of years ago.
    They are indeed the best of the bunch. Although they dont supply 100% renewables they are investing in more capacity.

    However I stand by my view that this capacity increase is driven more by the Renewables Obligation than anything else.
    The economics of wind do not stack up without the Renewable Obligation and very few would be prepared to pay 15p/Kwh.
    • CommentAuthorbiffvernon
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    ROC's have had their influence - that was the idea - but in the case of Ecotricity I think the relationship worked the other way round. ROCs exist because of the influence on government by people like Dale Vince.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2007
     
    We need more people like Dale - all credit to the man.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press