Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthordickster
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
     
    So, when the fairy godmother grants me my wish, a week's worth ( 24kWhrs) of stored juice, I'll need some batteries and hope one day to buy lots of LIFePO4 with kit etc. But where are the battery manufacturers?

    I can find very little 2013/2014 stuff on the net. Seems that all Chinese manufacturers are up to thier necks in nasties.

    Does anyone know? Are my hopes to be dashed on the rocks of reality?

    Or....would a Nissan Leaf battery pack do it?
  1.  
    Try Alibaba
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
     
    Currently, yes, all the reasonably economic LiFePOâ‚„ cells seem to be Chinese so, indeed, environmental concerns are rational. However, Tesla are planning to build a plant in the US. First off for their cars, of course, but also Elon Musk has home storage in mind.

    Also, I think the “donkey sanctuary” model has some merit: battery packs which don't quite have the capacity to be really useful in cars might work for a couple of years in a house, where the kWh/kg ratio isn't so critical, before finally being recycled. Perhaps there's a business to be made breaking up car packs, weeding out the weak cells and reassembling for domestic use.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
     
    Posted By: Ed DaviesPerhaps there's a business to be made breaking up car packs, weeding out the weak cells and reassembling for domestic use.
    There was a report about this a couple of years back.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
     
    Posted By: bot de paille: “Try Alibaba”

    I bought some 20 Ah cells to play with from these people in Prague: http://www.ev-power.eu/

    Initially I ordered some bigger cells but they had a batch delayed or something so I cancelled that - they were, at least, completely straightforward about the whole matter. Emailed order, transferred some money (in euros) and the cells turned up a fortnight or so later.

    Various blog posts about them and not-too distantly related topics: http://edavies.me.uk/blog/tag/electronics/
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014
     
    As Ed hinted, LiPo are quite fussy about being charged correctly. It is easy to kill the battery, fairly easy to explode it even, if overcharged.

    Since a single cell is typically 3.4-3.7V any battery useful for more than a phone will be quite a lot of cells in series... with complications for charging in series once things go out of balance. Designing around the failure modes is complex and usually needs to be application specific.

    It's bad enough if the typical laptop 12-20V 2AH setup goes wrong but larger capacities and voltages could be very disastrous. No-one with a decent reputation to lose would make cheap batteries without appropriately carefully designed chargers to go alongside - and the liabilities are pretty huge.

    It is just about feasible for cars where the charging is carefully controlled and of course you have to pay appropriately. Even then the battery packs are carefully controlled/restricted and in many cases you don't even get to officially own them.

    So yes, they are great for raw cost vs capacity, but don't expect cheap robust general purpose battery solutions any time soon.
    • CommentAuthorTimber
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014 edited
     
    High voltage high capacity LIPOs are now fairly common in the RC plane world. 60+volt packs running around 7-10 amp hours.

    Granted you would need a lot of those, but the technology exists.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2014 edited
     
    There are lots of different types of lithium ion batteries with very confusing names and abbreviations for the names:

    Lithium ion just means using lithium atoms with extra or fewer than normal electrons as the charge carrier. Lithium iron cells are ones which use the metal iron as one of the electrodes (I think). There are also lithium phosphate cells like LiFePOâ‚„ ones which should not be confused with lithium polymer LiPo cells.

    AIUI, the LiFePOâ‚„ cells which are often proposed for domestic use are a lot less spectacular when things go wrong than some of the other technologies. They don't have the same thermal runaway effects that some do. If overcharged they swell and eventually burst letting out unpleasant but not too disastrous materials. They're much less likely to burst into flames than some.

    They can also be damaged by discharging too far. That just stops them storing charge but I don't think it has any more overt effects.

    All cell types (lithium ion, lead acid, nickle cadmium, etc), when formed into a series battery, need some mechanism to keep them in balance. With most cell types you do this by overcharging them a bit. The leading cells in a lead acid battery get rid of their excess energy by bubbling off a bit of water by electrolysis. NiCds do it by getting a bit warmer.

    The downside to lithium ion batteries is that you can't just do this overcharge to balance the cells. Instead you have to measure individual cell voltages then charge the weaker cells or discharge the stronger cells periodically to keep them balanced.

    Some battery management systems do this balancing continuously. However, this has the disadvantage of wasting a bit of energy and also of holding the cells at the maximum charge voltage for a while when it's better to get them up to charge then stop charging and let them relax back to their natural voltage once charging has completed (i.e., not to do a float charge as is done with lead acid cells). Also, it's more complication in a high-energy system which is probably safer kept as simple as possible. I've read of cases of homebuilt EVs catching fire on charge where it looks like the original source of the problem was a fault in the battery balancing system.

    Practical experience has shown that actually cells track pretty well most of the time and that they only need to be balanced pretty rarely. E.g., cells being charged and discharged daily for a year or so without balancing.

    My plan, therefore, is to have a system which monitors the cells continuously and makes sure that no individual cell goes outside the range 3.0 V to 3.6 V (most of the energy goes in and out in about the range 3.2 to 3.4 V). Once in a while I'll do a manual balance if that proves to be necessary but will not have a balancing system connected in normal operation.

    Some of the newer ARM processors which are available pretty cheaply have multichannel ADCs with enough resolution to sensibly track the voltages of individual cells in a 24 V, maybe 48 V, battery so monitoring should be pretty easy. Arduino ADCs don't quite have the resolution to do this with sufficient margin to show the progress of cell charge or discharge.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014 edited
     
    They're still pretty disastrous for the cell pack when individual cells fail. You pretty much have to physically remove the failed cells to recover a useful battery.

    E-bikes, laptops, and even a few cars (like the original Tesla) still tend to use ordinary 18650 cells in series parallel. They are relatively cheap but the packs suffer badly when cells fail. A cell in a pack that discharges 100% will usually be completely destroyed (dead) by reverse current from the other cells. It's internal resistance can increase to the point it makes the pack either completely useless or running very hot (which shortly kills the other cells).

    Laptop batteries are usually 3 or 4 metal-case 18650 cells (or pairs or triples of cells in parallel) in series and these days pretty much all have the balancing circuitry built into the battery itself. The charger is then often just a simple current and voltage limited DC PSU. The ICs and ready-made PCBs used for this scale are widely available pretty cheaply (e.g. ebay) but you cannot sensibly do domestic scale storage this way.

    The main killer of laptop batteries is heat from being left on charge all day. This heat is not just from the charging batteries but also from the balancing circuitry when they reach full charge and from the laptop itself when running.

    Latest safe chemistry that is commercially available is Manganese (edit: Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt). They can still fail, just less likely to catch fire. They can still get *very* hot and they still don't tolerate overcharging. They are not used in laptops because their capacity is still significantly less than regular Lithium Ion but some other appliance manufacturers (e.g. Dyson) have started using these for safety reasons.

    You can also easily buy "protected" cells that have balancing circuitry for a single cell inside the metal cell case. These are much safer if charged in series than unprotected but if you have smart external balancing circuitry as well then this can sometimes fail to recognise full charge.

    Cell voltage often won't tell you much about a failing cell. They may just reach full voltage much sooner or never (ie. it can go both ways). Temperature is a better guide. For domestic use I think you would get most benefit by finding some large capacity cells rather than cell packs (latest vehicle battery cells are not cheap though) with decent ventilation for cooling and physically separating them from any source of heat and keeping an eye on individual cell temperatures (that should be easy enough). Latest safe chemistries are probably not much help here and not worth the extra cost or reduced capacity.

    I think flow cells (pumped large volume of liquid electrolyte) would be very interesting for large capacity but safety concerns around the plumbing would probably prevent them from seeing domestic use.

    There are enough expensive gotchas with Li-Ion that I don't think I would want to trust a home-brew domestic or vehicle setup. You'd end up tinkering with it all the time and failures could be seriously costly to fix.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014 edited
     
    Posted By: SprocketYou pretty much have to physically remove the failed cells to recover a useful battery.
    Why would that be a problem? Just disconnect the failed cell and connect another one - it'd only take a couple of minutes if you had a spare to hand.

    You'd end up tinkering with it all the time
    That's not the experience of the two people I've read who've set up domestic-scale batteries using LiFePOâ‚„ cells. It seems to me that they're less hassle than wet lead-acid cells - not needing topping up, of course.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014 edited
     
    > Why would that be a problem? Just disconnect the failed cell and connect another one
    > it'd only take a couple of minutes if you had a spare to hand.

    Locating the failed one. And access.
    There are 7000 of them in a Tesla. Tightly packed into packs. On welded tags.

    And the new cell will not be balanced. That can be sorted automatically... for cells simply in series... but not so easily for cells in series parallel like in the Tesla or your average e-bike.

    Look at the trouble for the Boeing Dreamliner recently. And that in a product that was designed for aerospace.

    > the two people I've read

    Two OK experiences isn't enough to have any confidence in a product.
    My laptop battery has been trouble-free for four years and still has >90% of it's capacity. I can find several other people that have had no trouble. But I also know of a few failures and disappointed laptop owners.
    I've had single cell failures in 2P3S HID lighting packs twice now. I just replaced all the cells because of the small scale and low cost but it was not hassle free and I don't fancy dealing with that on a domestic scale.

    I wouldn't do LA either unless I needed to be off grid for good reason.
    Of course you may like to experiment and enjoy doing so but there is no way this tech is safely (financially) viable as a commercial product for a reputable company (IMHO).
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014
     
    Found some guidance here..

    http://www.homepower.com/lfp-precautions
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014
     
    Sprocket, your comments wouldn't make a lot of sense in the context of the cells I linked to above.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014
     
    The original question was something like "where are the battery manufacturers?". I am just providing some context and explanation as to why there are not many and no big names and reputations.

    Companies like Tesla have tried to make this business cost effective but it is marginal and still only worthwhile because there is an expensive car attached and they get to sell you the whole system including charger and even then for a very specific and controlled use. Renault will sell you a car but will not allow you to own the battery, you have to lease that.

    Dickster asked for 24kWH.
    Even if we do that with prismatics like you suggest we have what... 50 cells at 3.2V and 160Ah in simple series. At a cost of what... at least $60 each for volume or $200 each for lots of 50 (anonymous Chinese product).

    Then there is the BMS. To monitor each of 50 cells you need a fair bit of circuitry, for reliability preferably some at each battery. Cost of that is anything you like but in power electronics you get what you pay for.

    And you have 150V DC so still need an inverter for normal use. Cost should be comparable to a PV inverter.
    Then development cost? And testing? Just how safe is this? Can you even get product liability insurance?
    And where will you put them? Can you get household insurance if you have these in your house?

    Yes it is easily feasible. No it is not really commercially viable (yet)... hence no complete system products with useful warranties from the usual reputable big-name companies.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014 edited
     
    Posted By: Sprocket: “I am just providing some context and explanation as to why there are not many and no big names and reputations.”

    Yes, things are still at a fairly early stage. I just think you paint a blacker picture than is justified and also one which is confusing as it mixes in issues with lithium technologies other than the LiFePOâ‚„ cells likely to be used domestically. If somebody wanted a domestic 24 kWh or so system but didn't want to put it together themselves then I'd suggest these people who have done a small number of bespoke systems for clients:

    http://www.sustainables4u.co.uk/

    Their technical director is this chap:

    http://solarbodge.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/615-cyles-still-grinnin.html

    One of the two people who I know of who've been running these cells without a BMS quite happily.

    Damon HD, who used to be active on this forum, also uses (or used) LiFePOâ‚„ cells for a small domestic energy store. It was reading about his system that first got me seriously interested in the cells. Not sure if he had a BMS, though.
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014
     
    I am still using the LiFePO4 battery. It has a built-in BMS.

    http://www.earth.org.uk/off-grid-stats.html

    Companies such as Nedap offer turn-key domestic Li-based battery solutions right now, as it happens.

    Rgds

    Damon
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeMar 29th 2014
     
    Fair enough, if it works for you. I never said it was impossible.
    And yes, I am a bit of a natural pessimist (so I am told).

    Damon, what scale is your battery?
    •  
      CommentAuthorDamonHD
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2014
     
    Small; enough to run my server for a couple of days at ~200Wh.

    But I have a background project to integrate ~20kWh (3 days' worth) of a similar chemistry battery with our 5.2kWp PV system to keep us entirely off the grid for most of the year.

    Rgds

    Damon
    • CommentAuthormarkocosic
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2014
     
    Assuming that you need some heat in winter, why not add hydraulic dry-breaks to a mass-produced, self-propelled 50kWe/100kWth combined heat and power unit with a couple of kWh electrical storage?

    http://www.toyota.co.uk/new-cars/prius

    Split it with half a dozen neighbours and it's dirt chepa even if you don't drive it... ;-)
    • CommentAuthordickster
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2014
     
    Ta for all the info.

    It's all a bit worrying when you read about Winston/Thundersky batteries. They went bust. Mr Winston seems to be in trouble with the authorities, but I can supposedly still order the batteries on the internet.

    The problem is parting with large amounts of money with no real security or guarantee that you're going to get what you pay for. it would be great if someone stocked them in UK, I'd be willing to pay a plussage for peace of mind.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2014
     
    http://www.ev-power.eu/ are, at least, in the EU, stock cells from multiple manufacturers and have been in business for a while - I bought my cells off them two years ago now and they'd been around for a while before that. Personally, I'd check they have the cells in stock before sending money but apart from that wouldn't have much concern ordering from them.
  2.  
    If you pay by credit card, the goods aren't as described/faulty, you return the goods to the retailer & they don't give you a full refund including shipping costs then you are entitled to a refund of the total cost from your credit card company. Its up to the credit card company to manage getting the money back from the retailer & in the meantime they should refund the full amount to you. This applies equally to goods purchased from foreign retailers:

    http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2007/149-07

    David
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeApr 16th 2014
     
    Posted By: davidfreeboroughIf you pay by credit card, the goods aren't as described/faulty, you return the goods to the retailer & they don't give you a full refund including shipping costs then you are entitled to a refund of the total cost from your credit card company.

    Interesting. I've recently been told by our window supplier that this provision doesn't apply because the windows are manufactured specifically to order, but I see in the link you gave that it seems to apply to services as well as goods, and services are always specifically to order. Does anybody know know how the law actually works with regard to credit cards and custom-made goods?
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press