Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorphilnixon
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2015
     
    Hi,

    About to make a decision on MHRV units. The house is approx 175-180m2 with high ceilings, so on the edge of the top capacity of smaller units (such as the Brookvent Aircycle 1.2). I could get a bigger unit, but the house is a victorian refurb so not guaranteed to be airtight. It's a 4 bed family house but there will only be 2 occupants at the moment so I think there would be plenty of air circulating with a smaller unit.

    Is it worth oversizing the unit at this point, or going with the cheaper, smaller model? Are there any pros / cons with oversizing?

    Thanks!
    Phil
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2015
     
    Con is it costs a bit more, pro is that it will be quieter and more efficient.
    Do the sums, or as they said in wood work classes, measure twice, cut once.
    • CommentAuthorphilnixon
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2015
     
    The sums say a smaller unit will work if operating at maximum capacity - I am slightly concerned about the noise though.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2015
     
    I would oversize, even double!
    • CommentAuthorsnyggapa
    • CommentTimeMay 20th 2015
     
    we had to run our vext axia sentinel kinetic at about 65% fan power to get it signed off for building regs - and it was intrusively noisy - fortunately we have down-rated it to run at about 35% after it has been signed off, which is fine.

    However with hindsight I would have bought the "plus" model which has a higher rating, and if I read the specs right a lower noise level even at roughly double the air capacity (although of course if you try and suck or blow a gale through a restricted outlet you will generate significant noise at the terminal itself)

    -Steve
  1.  
    Hi Phil - I remember you asked this the other night but not sure I answered. Oversizing was my logic for the Kinetic Plus. Always better to have some headroom - most things are noisier, less efficient and die sooner if run at their limits.
    • CommentAuthorGreenfish
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2015 edited
     
    The house is approx 175-180m2 with high ceilings, so on the edge of the top capacity of smaller units (such as the Brookvent Aircycle 1.2).


    If just looking at the quoted max unit capacity then I would definitely oversize significantly. In real life the ducting and terminals reduce the flow the fan can deliver, and manufacturers seem to forget the 0.3l/s per sqm floor area needed for building regs. The question you need answered is will the fan deliver 0.3*180 l/s with the static pressure that the route of ducting and vents you are installing will present. Also look at how this flow will divide between terminals (proportioned by room floor area, but with minimums for kitchen and bathrooms), and unit needed to meet the flow of the limiting terminal.

    I mistakenly thought a Silavent HRX2, with a max flow of 406 m3/h was more than adequate for my 540m3 house (that is 0.75ACH), but I was looking at the wrong parameters. Actually Polypipe didn't provide the more useful details, but I assumed the designers (salesmen) would know what they were doing. In practice it had to be at full blast to deliver the 65l/s required for regs and was very noisey. I have now turned it right down, experimenting if that is adequate for providing IAQ. So far so good, regs seem OTT, but I have no way to test if it is removing any VOCs adequately, and that is what drives the 0.3l/s per sqm regulation. If it is inadequate then I will have to open windows, which will make MVHR a wasted investment. So...

    Unless cost is preclusive invest in a unit that can deliver your needs well within its limits, and be careful that the unit you choose will do that in practice. Also ensure that the system design is not trying to force a gale through a single vent, that is noisey too, install multiple terminals instead.

    Oh and when it is all done come back and tell us how it worked out.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press