Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.
Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
 Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



General: Does PIV work?

Bottom of Page

1 to 19 of 19

  1.  
    • CommentAuthordelprado
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2017 edited
     
    This, presumably reliable, report suggests it does not. The idea of solar gain in a roof space in winter is clearly wrong - when properly insulated at ceiling level the roof space should be colder than ever. Leaking moisture into loft, which is the reports mention, is also clearly avoidable.

    http://projects.bre.co.uk/positivevent/
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2017
     
    Yes

    BUT think about it, blowing cold air into a home results in warm air being pushed out,

    The occupant pays the bills for the fans to run and for the additional heat losses too.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2017
     
    But the occupant does not have to leave windows open for hours, and a damp free house needs less heating. So yes PIV does work and is cheap to install.

    PIV works like magic if you have a tenant with lots of condensation due to their life style, these tenant are mostly not willing to pay £50 pcm more rent to get MVHR.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2017
     
    "The test house was very airtight, with an air leakage rate of 4.5 ach @ 50 Pa having been measured by a fan pressurisation test (Reference 1)."

    So they think that ten times as leaky as my house is "very airtight". Doesn't say much for their standards or expectations really.

    "In both the test and occupied houses, the roof space was consistently more humid than outside (excess vapour pressure of about 0.1 kPa), implying that moisture was being transmitted to the roof space from the rooms below."

    Seems to imply that the test house did not have an effective VCL.

    To be fair, this is a rather old study, from 2000, but this report

    http://www.building.co.uk/positive-input-ventilation/4598.article

    exposes a bit of the BRE bias - it says "relatively airtight", which is a more reasonable assessment sadly.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeMar 6th 2017 edited
     
    One of the problem is that PIV systems reduce real life condensation a lot more then any logic says they should given how little they reduce measured average RH.......

    No one with half a brain would consider putting a PIV system in a "very airtight" home, they tend to be fitted into homes that are well below park L standards. The PIV makers do say you should seal all down-lighters and any holes in the ceiling so that steam from the bathroom does not go into the loft - but I don't know how often this is done. I was told to just turn the lights on in all the rooms, and check at night if I could see any light coming into the loft!
    • CommentAuthordelprado
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017
     
    Can anyone comment on how they work in the summer? We have a slate roof and so the loft gets ludicrously hot. I can't have that heat being pumped into the home...
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017
     
    Not a good ides, better to reverse the fan
    • CommentAuthordelprado
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017
     
    What do I do Tony? I am at a loss as to what to do in my retrofit project. I can't have ducting everywhere.
    • CommentAuthorgravelld
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017
     
    It's one of the big conundrums of retrofit.

    If you want heat exchanging you have to either duct and box in, or use a ductless system, as discussed in other threads.

    Also:

    - PVHR
    - PIV
    - MEV (with optional exhaust air heat pump)
    • CommentAuthorgyrogear
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017
     
    Posted By: delpradoCan anyone comment on how they work in the summer? We have a slate roof and so the loft gets ludicrously hot. I can't have that heat being pumped into the home...


    Surely, in summer the house would be open anyhow (doors and/or windows), so would you be needing the input from a PIV in any case ?

    (I throw water onto the deck and use evaporative cooling to get a cooler airflow up my stairs from the basement etc.°).

    And at night, you ought to be drawing cool air into the bottom of the building anyhow, and letting it out at the top ?

    I'd respectfully suggest that a period of observation is required (say one year, to see how the house works...) before diving in to a particular technical route...

    gg
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeMar 31st 2017 edited
     
    Posted By: delpradoCan anyone comment on how they work in the summer? We have a slate roof and so the loft gets ludicrously hot. I can't have that heat being pumped into the home...


    Most of the units have a thermostat that just turns them off if the loft is too hot. People do after all open windows in the summer.....

    Remember that a PIV unit is a cheap way to stop mold without having to open windows in winter (that no tenants do in real life), they don't claim to give you the same air quality or energy saving that a correct design and installed MVHR system does.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017
     
    Not cheap for the tenants as they have to pay to both run the fans and for the consequential deliberate heat losses involved.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017
     
    Posted By: tonyNot cheap for the tenants as they have to pay to both run the fans and for the consequential deliberate heat losses involved.


    Cheaper for them then leaving the windows open all winter or losing their deposit due to mold. When tenants start telling me they will pay more rent to get MVHR systems (or even loft insulation), I will consider if the rate of return make it worth while providing MVHR systems.
  14.  
    The fans are around £5.00 per year to run in electricity - so truly negligible.

    I haven't got any numbers on extra heat loss, but I expect it is -ve compared to the extra cost of heating up humidity in the air or heat lost through open windows and trickle vents.

    Ferdinand
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017
     
    I can't see that, the cost must be quantifiable in terms of blowing cold air into a home, an equivalent volume of hot air is being expelled.
    • CommentAuthorCX23882
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017 edited
     
    Yes, MVHR is more efficient than PIV, but I recall discussions on here where the opinion was that MVHR doesn't move sufficient air to distribute heat around a property. So if that's the case, how can PIV, which moves even less air, cause such a big heat loss? My cigarette packet calculations suggested that the difference in capital cost is much more than the cost of the proportion of gas usage that can be attributed to ventilation losses, but maybe I missed something out of the admittedly rudimentary calcs.

    My property is very small. I wonder if things work out more in favour of MVHR as property size increases?

    My gas bill has gone down since fitting a PIV unit. Maybe it would have been even lower with MVHR, but the payback period is ridiculous. The upfront cost is significantly higher. The electric running cost is higher. The ongoing maintenance costs are higher. I'm not against moving up to MVHR in the future, but at the moment, it doesn't seem to be worth it for me.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017
     
    Posted By: ferdinand2000I haven't got any numbers on extra heat loss, but I expect it is -ve compared to the extra cost of heating up humidity in the air or heat lost through open windows and trickle vents.

    I agree with this assessment. The point not explicitly stated but implied is that you DO have to open the windows and lose the heat if you want to avoid mould, or else run the whole house hotter so condensation doesn't form.

    Posted By: tonyI can't see that, the cost must be quantifiable in terms of blowing cold air into a home, an equivalent volume of hot air is being expelled.

    Agreed, so why don't you calculate those costs? Ferdinand didn't say they were impossible to know, simply that he hadn't done the sums.

    Posted By: CX23882My gas bill has gone down since fitting a PIV unit.

    And there's some actual evidence of what Ferdinand said.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2017
     
    For a comparison with MVHR, here's my back of an envelope. I typically run the unit at 125 m³/hr for 8 hours overnight during winter to allow the post heater to work and at 50 m³/hr for the other 16 hours. (The volume of the house is 440 m³ for PHPP purposes.) At the moment I'm running it at 125 m³/hr for 8 hours whilst its daylight (so it's powered by the PV) and 50 m³/hr for the other 16 hours. I'm not entirely sure what I'll do this summer so lets assume the same.

    At 50 m³/hr it consumes 9 W. At 125 m³/hr it consumes 26 W.

    So 8 hours at 26 W and 16 hours at 8 W. I make that (9*16+26*8)*365/1000 = 128.5 kWh/year. At an arbitrary 15p per unit that's £19.20 per year. In practice most of my 26 W periods are cheaper - E7 night rate in winter and free PV otherwise.
    • CommentAuthorDandJ
    • CommentTimeApr 4th 2017
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: delprado</cite>Can anyone comment on how they work in the summer? We have a slate roof and so the loft gets ludicrously hot. I can't have that heat being pumped into the home...</blockquote>

    I've been looking at fitting a PIV system recently and the envirovent unit has an outside feed which will switch to external air source when the loft gets too hot. Its also available with two outputs and a heater for when the loft is too cold (as many of them do).

    Still looking at which one to fit myself, it was originally going to be MVHR but that is too much work and expense for me.

1 to 19 of 19

  1.  
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
Back to Discussions Top of Page
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press