Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorDavebrigg
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    We have a biomass boiler and 1000 l thermal store in an outbuilding about 30 metres from the house. This has a circuit to a heat exchanger for the central heating. There is also a mains feed which runs through a coil in the thermal store to provide hot water. There are two problems.
    1) When running a basin of water, several litres are wasted while the hot water makes its way to the house.
    2) The boiler has to be run manually. When the central heating is on in the winter the temperature of the thermal store sometimes drops, especially first thing in the morning, providing just a warm water supply.
    We want to fit an additional back-up heat source in the house. A local engineer was about to fit a copper tank with an immersion heater, but then realised that our hot water was at mains pressure, and said that heating it would cause a dangerous increase in pressure.
    If we can't use a standard immersion heater, is there an alternative?

    Also, for times when only a little hot water was used, any tank would refill firstly by taking the cold water already in the pipes to the thermal store. The pipes would fill with hot water, which would then slowly cool down again, with the heat wasted.
    Ideally we would like a system that makes best use of the water from the thermal store, but which could boost the temperature if it fell below a set minimum. Does such a system exist?
    Thanks
    Dave
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010 edited
     
    1) can be solved by installing a well insulated "secondary loop" like thay have in hotels.

    2) How about fitting an electric boiler in the primary side of the store eg between the biomass boiler and the thermal store. Most of the time the water will flow straight through it, but you could modify the existing stat on the store to turn it and the pump on when the biomass boiler is off.

    http://www.heatandplumb.com/acatalog/Heatrae_Sadia_Amptec_Electric_Boilers.html

    The main problem is that it would take awhile to heat up 1000L from stone cold - but presumably you can put it on a time clock to check the temperature at say 5am and have it topped up by 7am or something like that.

    It's also possible your plumber wasn't approved to work on mains pressure which is why he said it wasn't possible. Mains pressure tanks do exist.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    You can also get electric "combi" boilers that operate at mains pressure. The problem is you need a very big powerful one to get good flow rates. Be sure you understand this issue. For example a 10kW electric combi boiler will have a similar flow rate to a 10kW electric shower.
  1.  
    Normal copper tanks will not cope with mains pressure, never mind the expansion pressure created by heating water. A mains pressure imersion tank is needed but even this won't cope with the incease in pressure due to heating expansion. This problem is solved here by fitting a pressure relief valve to the input of the tank, this valve then dribbles water as the water heats up allowing excess pressure to escape. It helps to pipe this valve to a drain! The valve also has a non return function to prevent heated water being pushed back up the mains pipe. (Keeps the water authority happy) You could ignore the whole expansion issue if you connect the tank directly to the mains and so allow the mains to take up the expansion but if the mains was ever turnd off and the heater operated then over pressure would result and in any case the water authority would not be happy.

    In your situaion I would super insulate the pipe from the thermal store (and use plastic pipe as I have found this to be less of a heat sink than copper or iron pipes), feed this to the super insulated hot water tank and run the DHW from the tank. The immersion heater in the tank would be set at a lowish temperature to provide adaquate DHW and powered by off peak electricity with the water pre heated by the thermal store.

    Peter
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    Cheapest to install would be instantaneous (thinking electric here) in-line heaters near to the taps, but as Colin says they do not have a great flow rate for their size and may well need an upgraded domestic supply. To calculate the flow rate or the increase in temperature rearrange the Specify Heat Capacity formula 4.18Jg^-1K^-1 where J is the energy needed, g is the mass and K is the increase in temperature. So to increase 1 litre (1kg) by 1 K would take 4100 J. Divide this by the power of the heater, say 1 kW and you get the time needed to heat by 1 K (4.18 seconds as a Watt is a Js^-1). If you divide 60 (seconds in minute) by the time (4.18 s) you get the flow rate in litre per minute, 14.35 Litre per minute. My shower delivers at the rate of 11 Lmin^-1 at about 30-35 C (or 303-308 K to be more correct)
    Now that example is for a little heater and a tiny temperature increase. but as you are only concerned about the first minute or so of a shower and a bowl of washing up water the running costs would not be to great as you could set the temperature to the ideal shower temperature/washing up water temperature.

    As Peter points out there will be large losses in the pipework unless they are very well insulated (is there an actual number that can be put on 'Super' insulation, would like to think there is).

    In the early 80's my parents bought a house that had a 'recirculating hot water system', total pipe run was about 120m and the running costs were horrendous and there was this constant hum from the pipes, put a new boiler in closer to the house and just accepted that it took a couple of minutes to get hot water.

    As usual always correct my calculations as it is easy to get confused with numbers.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    A plate heat exchanger on the CH circuit seems to me an expensive solution to providing temp controlled CH water. Why not use the PHx for your DHW, ( store one side and rising mains on the other ), and put the CH on a direct circuit from the store via a ACASO type control valve.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    Be slightly careful of adding more (or thicker) insulation to a pipe - you can easily reach a point where the increased surface area actually loses more heat than it saves.

    I find it difficult to believe that you don't have a circuating HWS return when the heater is 30m from the property - bit of a design flaw that.

    I suspect all you need is a bit of storage at the point of use end, probably with an immersion heater top up - the cold slug moving into the tank as you draw off in the house being suitably diluted by a reasonable cylinder volume.

    Suitable expansion vessel and overpressure/overtemperature valve (ie an unvented kit) should deal with any safety concerns

    Regards

    Barney
  2.  
    Barney wrote
    Be slightly careful of adding more (or thicker) insulation to a pipe - you can easily reach a point where the increased surface area actually loses more heat than it saves.

    I have a bit of trouble getting my head around more insulation on a pipe could cause greater heat loss. I can easily accept the point of dimminshing returns, but to add insulation and thereby increase heat loss I find difficult to see. If this is the case can someone explain / detail the breakpoint with various types of insulation.

    Peter
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010 edited
     
    Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary A mains pressure imersion tank is needed but even this won't cope with the incease in pressure due to heating expansion. This problem is solved here by fitting a pressure relief valve to the input of the tank, this valve then dribbles water as the water heats up allowing excess pressure to escape.


    The regs here make a PRV mandatory and if an expansion vessel is also fitted they won't leak in normal use.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    How about fitting an immersion heater element to the existing thermal store? Perhaps it already has one or a blanked off hole to fit one?
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary</cite>Barney wrote
    Be slightly careful of adding more (or thicker) insulation to a pipe - you can easily reach a point where the increased surface area actually loses more heat than it saves.

    I have a bit of trouble getting my head around more insulation on a pipe could cause greater heat loss</blockquote>

    Me too, unless the insulation is crammed into (compressed) and existing volume, then the air (the bit that actually insulates) will be squeezed out leaving just the carrier material which will have it's own R-value that is probably lower (or is it higher) than the air/material combination. PVC 0.19 Km^-1K^-1, Air 0.24 Km^-1K^-1 but combined in a 'foam' probably around 0.3 Km^-1K^-1. All I can think off.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeJul 26th 2010
     
    Perhaps my comment was a bit vague - I was suggesting that the "amount" of insulation is a balancing act - any insulation adds thermal resistance to the flow of heat from a pipe but also adds surface area, if you keep adding insulation you will find a point where the increased resistance "wins" over the increased surface area - if you are in a zone prior to the critical thickness being reached then here increased insulation thickness will add to heat loss rather than diminish it.

    It's fairly easy to determine this critical point for any insulation given its U value and knowledge of the pipe temperature/diameter

    Regards

    Barney
  3.  
    Barney

    There is a critical thickness, but the curve goes in the other direction & it's the worst case not the best. Below the critical thickness the insulation increases the heat loss. Above the critical thickness the insulation reduces the heat loss. For typical insulators the critical thickness is a millimetre or two, so it's not generally relevant to pipe insulation.

    http://www.cheresources.com/insulationzz.shtml

    David
    • CommentAuthorDavebrigg
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2010 edited
     
    Many thanks for the range of ideas, which I have spent some time reading. Physics is not my strong point. There is definitely a design flaw somewhere in the system, and with hindsight I should have had everything professionally designed first, rather than relying on the installer to suggest the arrangement.

    I'm not sure how a secondary loop for DHW would work unless a separate hot water tank was installed or some sort of non-return valve was fitted to the mains supply. We are in quite a high water pressure area.

    Increasing the insulation of the pipe run seems to be one priority. The 25mm metal pipes have a thin insulation sleeve (approx 5mm) and were then laid in a slightly larger plastic pipe. They are buried about a metre down, but in frosty weather their route can be traced by the line of grass which remains unfrozen.

    I had thought about some sort of in line electric heater, similar to an electric shower. However, the temperature control on our shower works by altering the water flow rate rather than electricity consumption. Would it be safe to run an inline heater if the water coming in was already at 50 degrees and the flow rate was kept low by the hot tap being only partially open?

    It looks like the two options are to fit an immersion heater to the thermal store, controlled by thermostat and timer and with better insulated pipes, or the expansion vessel with immersion. This would have the advantage of leaving the CH to be solely heated by the biomass.

    Once again, thanks for the ideas. It all suddenly looks much clearer.
  4.  
    If you can see the line of the pipes in frosty weather then the priority MUST be to better insulate the pipes. If the CH has the same standard of insulation then these should be done as well. Underground pipe insulation must be non absorbent because sooner or later, even if laid in a pipe water will get in and without a closed cell structure the insulation properties will fail. Unfortunately underground pipe insulation is expensive, but a one time cost that provides years of benefit.

    Given that your pipe work needs proper insulation I would suggest that you insulate to the best standard available / affordable and then see what difference is made, you might find that the system performs adequately without further modification.

    If you are going to the expense of digging up and insulating anyway perhaps you would consider replacing the metal pipe with a plastic pipe as plastic is a poorer heat sink than metal. Also do you need a 25mm pipe, if 18mm or 15mm would give sufficient flow then using a smaller dia. gives less volume to move before the taps are reached, higher velocity with a partially open tap and cheaper insulation for the same u value.
    • CommentAuthorcrusoe
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2010 edited
     
    This is, in theory, very simple. Swallow the fact that a design faux pas has occurred, and rather than trying to engineer around it, which will always be a compromise, move forward. Forget secondary loops at this distance, with their energy-sapping heat losses and parasitic pump losses. My solution would be to Install a second, much smaller slave thermal store with built-in DHW exchanger (mains) and TMV near the point of use.

    If I read you right, you already have heating primaries running between the TS and the house. Tap into these in good old 'S' Plan fashion within the building, and re-tap into the DHW loop already running to drawoffs, but just 30m nearer the drawoff point.

    Drawbacks: Yes, you will need a bit of space for an airing cupboard, and there is plumbing and wiring to do. Advantages: An Airing cupboard! No lengthy dead legs, ergo quicker hot water service. Removal of white elephant DHWS, no added electricity to consume. I could go on for days, and have frequently been known to, but just suffice to say that heating a slave tank in this way requires just one dose of heat transfer, (til the next time the DHW needs heating) so the heat loss in the pipes is minimised - and in winter, these same pipes are hot much of the time anyway feeding the heating system. Not quite sure what you mean by a heat exchanger for the central heating though?

    Your caveat would be how much disruption to the existing arrangement and (finished?) property this will cause. Very annoying at this stage of the game though! If you paid for this work as opposed to DIY, I would suggest significant redress, as somebody should have known much better, or asked.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2010
     
    Posted By: crusoe Not quite sure what you mean by a heat exchanger for the central heating though?

    This had me me confused too, crusoe, although I think someone mentioned it some time ago on another thread. I couldn't understand why anyone would put in a 500 quid PHEx to control CH water temp, when an ACASO motorised valve, which is designed for the job, would do it at a fraction of the price and better.

    Davebrigg; Your high water pressure is easily managed on the rising main with a pressure reducing valve. Your idea of an immersion heater in your 1000l store may end up costing the earth to run. I put a 6kw one in my 2000l store and after the initial test run ditched the idea after the meter was "glowing " red hot. It's now just there as a last ditch emergency should the boiler fail, lighting another fire is cheaper. Crusoe's idea of a second store would be my solution too, but get those pipes insulated as a priority. Your installer too needs sorting out.
  5.  
    I have to ask you, Davebrigg, are the CH pipes insulated to the same standard as the DHW pipes because if they are you will be heating the clouds and you should have a strong chat with your installer and then get all the underground pipes properly sorted
    Peter
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeJul 29th 2010 edited
     
    Posted By: Davebrigg I'm not sure how a secondary loop for DHW would work unless a separate hot water tank was installed or some sort of non-return valve was fitted to the mains supply. We are in quite a high water pressure area.


    It works fine. We have a mains pressure secondary loop. The exact details depend on how the store heats the DHW. Lets assume your incoming mains cold water is passed through a coil in the thermal store then it goes underground to the house. Near to a H/W tap in the house you connect a smaller bore "return" pipe and run it back to the thermal store. There it's T'd into where the cold mains enters the thermal store. In the return leg of the loop you put a small circulating pump. I don't believe there is any need for a non-return valve anywhere.

    You can actually run several return pipes, one from every hot outlet in the house, so all are kept hot. Just T them together before they leave the house and return to the store.

    You can also put the pump on a time clock so the loop only runs during daytime.


    Increasing the insulation of the pipe run seems to be one priority. The 25mm metal pipes have a thin insulation sleeve (approx 5mm) and were then laid in a slightly larger plastic pipe. They are buried about a metre down, but in frosty weather their route can be traced by the line of grass which remains unfrozen.


    Yikes. That sounds like virtually no insulation. Much more needed. Must be wasting you a small fortune.

    I had thought about some sort of in line electric heater, similar to an electric shower. However, the temperature control on our shower works by altering the water flow rate rather than electricity consumption. Would it be safe to run an inline heater if the water coming in was already at 50 degrees and the flow rate was kept low by the hot tap being only partially open?


    I'd be very surprised if electric boilers didn't have some way to limit/control the flow temperature at low flow rates.

    It looks like the two options are to fit an immersion heater to the thermal store, controlled by thermostat and timer and with better insulated pipes....


    If you can fit an immersion element to the store that would be reasonably cheap to do. Digging up the pipes and insulating them better will be harder.
    • CommentAuthorDavebrigg
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2010
     
    Thanks again for your comments. I'll try to clarify the current position, and ask for an idiot's guide to some of the advice already given.
    The DHW comes from a mains water supply (standard blue 25mm pipe) that enters the thermal store and presumably moves around an internal coil to emerge much hotter from a 22mm flexible metal pipe. It then goes under the garden to a shed on the side of the house. At this point the pipe splits to take the hot water to the kitchen and two bathrooms.
    The water for the central heating comes from the same thermal store, underground to the house (with the same cr*p insulation). It enters a plate heat exchanger, then returns to the thermal store. On the other side of the heat exchanger is the central heating circuit. One explanation for using a heat exchanger could be that the thermal store and central heating were fitted by different people. It may also be to keep the Fernox, and whatever sediment appears in the radiators, away from the thermal store. The thermal store is an Akvaterm 1000l tank, which seems to be working well.
    I now understand how a continuous flow loop could be used for DHW. Aside from the cost of running a pump, there is the added cost of a divorce lawyer after I explain that the few bits of our house that are looking reasonable will have to be pulled apart to fit the extra pipework. This is a three month renovation that has already lasted nearly four years, so anything that involves more dust and chaos will have to wait for the moment. An immersion element for emergencies (or if we go away at Christmas) sounds like a good idea.

    I need to ask Owlman, what does a ACASO motorised valve do? Would it replace the plate heat exchanger?

    Also, for Crusoe "My solution would be to Install a second, much smaller slave thermal store with built-in DHW exchanger (mains) and TMV near the point of use.

    If I read you right, you already have heating primaries running between the TS and the house. Tap into these in good old 'S' Plan fashion within the building, and re-tap into the DHW loop already running to drawoffs, but just 30m nearer the drawoff point."
    An airing cupboard is no problem - there is already an empty one in the bathroom from an earlier oil-fired Aga system. There is not a DHW loop though. I would need to provide a return loop and pump so that a steady flow from the thermal store could heat the tank. Presumably the tank would have a feed from the existing cold water supply.
    All this is possible, especially if I going to dig up the garden to improve the pipe insulation anyway, but this time I want to be clear that I understand the system before starting.

    As for the installer... I can't say too much as they also participate in online forums. There were problems we found at the time that nearly resulted in legal actions, so the less contact we have with them the better, even if it means more work for me. I should have been more careful when he arrived on a horse, carrying a lassoo and six-guns.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2010
     
    Posted By: Davebrigg

    I need to ask Owlman, what does an ACASO motorised valve do? Would it replace the plate heat exchanger?

    Hi David, Presumably, your installers put in the PHx in order to control the often, near boiling, water in the store, and so prevent scalding water entering the CH circuit. My point was that this expensive bit of kit is not best suited to the task.
    The alternative, and cheaper, and in my opinion better, way of doing things would be to strip out the PHx and put the CH on a direct circuit from the store. This is done via an ACASO automix 20 or the ACASO CT. They are essentially the same bit of kit ( namely a variable three way motorised valve linking the flow and return ), but using slightly different controls. The CT, ( constant temp. ), and the automix 20, ( via a room stat ). I think they are an essential bit of kit in any biomass/acccumulator set up, and the best and most efficient way of linking the high temp. store and the lower temp CH circuit, and like I said, they're designed for the job. what I also suggested was then to use the now redundant PHx to heat your DHW, putting the the rising main in one side and the " unregulated " accumulator water on the other. That way you're getting mains pressure DHW. The coil in the store that you are currently using would then be redundant. Having the store water, the CH water, and one side of a PHX, all using the same closed circulating " dirty " water is not a problem if inhibitors and an odd sludge trap is used. When you sort out the pipe insulation situation were you also considering putting in new pre insulated pipe between the house and store ?
    I agreed with Crusoe on the second store issue simply because I dont think from my experience that a 1000l store is big enough. but not knowing your home, or boiler size, or hot water useage it is a bit difficult to say.

    Mike
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2010
     
    Posted By: DavebriggI now understand how a continuous flow loop could be used for DHW. Aside from the cost of running a pump..


    That's modest as the pump needed is very small. It just has to circulate enough water to compensate for heat losses in the pipe work. It's not having to boost pressure or supply the flow rate needed by a shower or anything like that. If you really wanted to get fancy you could put a pipe stat on the furthest tap and use that to control the loop pump - so the loop pump only runs when the temperature at the remote tap falls below a set limit.

    there is the added cost of a divorce lawyer after I explain that the few bits of our house that are looking reasonable will have to be pulled apart to fit the extra pipework.


    One possibility would be to connect the return path to flow as near as possible to the taps without incuring a divorce. For example you could connect the return to the flow in the shed. That way at least part of the run is kept hot. I'd certainly put in a return pipe when you dig up the garden to insulate the existing flow pipe even if you don't use it yet.
    • CommentAuthorcrusoe
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2010
     
    DB: No, you are missing the point through incomplete knowledge.

    Having a pumped primary from the TS to the house, you need to 'simply' (?) tap into that flow and separate the heating and hot water sides. Think of it as a T Junction - one side goes to UFH/rads, the other to a new hot water tank. Google 'S' Plan if unsure of principle, or drop me an email. Caveat is that you haven't already mixed the primary flow down to temps below which a useful DHW transfer (note: not exchange, the exchange takes place in the DHW coil in the slave TS) can take place. I guess not due to your ongoing discussion with owlman and the PHx. (But if so, that should be easily reversable). I would likewise ditch the PHx when fitting the MVs for the S Plan. Mixing valves are available without having to PHx-it here.

    CW: IMQO you are getting (theoretically) too fancy and confusing the issue. A 30m (one way!) DHWS loop is never going to work well unless you wish to contribute further to global warming. Why not go via Old Trafford while we are at it and add to the Meltaway pitch UFH? OK, I use hyperbole, but why try and fix a faulty design when it can be amended for similar, (hopefully non-divorcing) cost, mess and disruption? All things are possible, not all things desirable. Like the pipe stat suggestion. If the DHWS loop is to be designed properly, it needs to be mixed down to a reasonable temp, even allowing for pipe losses en route. This would preclude the need for a pipe stat, as any theoretical saving from the stat just won't happen. If it's too hot, just adjust the TMV. A timer, yes, a stat, no.

    Why are we discussing fixing this? It will cost DB more to heat it than to change it, and the dear knows, it needs changing. Green building innit?
    • CommentAuthorDavebrigg
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2010
     
    Ok. Firstly to clarify: Yes, 1000 litre thermal store is probably too small. We have an old, listed property with a lot of poorly insulated rooms. I have done what I can within the listing rules but running the heating for an hour brings the TS temp from 80 to 40 degrees unless the boiler is lit. I know a second tank could be added, but just not at the moment.

    The PHx does not regulate the temperature of the rads. Getting rid of it would be a relief; it slowly blocked on the CH side after being fitted (undetected leak in the CH system drained all the inhibitor) and spent last summer being soaked and flushed with Fernox.

    I Googled Acaso Ct and found an earlier post from this site by Owlman explaining its use to improve layering in the thermal store. That's another can of worms, since the current system has nothing to prevent mixing, and it doesn't take long for the tank to reach an average medium temp throughout.

    I have checked the S Plan and found diagrams. The only fly in the ointment might be that the boiler works manually i.e. I go out and light it. (We gave up using wood pellets for several reasons. On the plus side, our fuel is now free and diverted from a journey to landfill.) Therefore, if the TS temp falls, the slave tank can call for hot water all it likes and run the pump all day for no result. This could be overcome if an electric immersion was used in the TS for the winter mornings when all the heat has already gone to the rads. Expensive, as has been pointed out. Another advantage would be that a single flow and return would mean that I could use the existing two ducts under the garden, each large enough to take a single 22mm pipe with better insulation. I have looked at Armaflex insulation, but will see if there is anything else better suited.

    The biggest problem seems to be the lack of qualified and experienced installers. Four years ago I could only find one person within 50 miles offering to fit a biomass boiler, but he clearly had little knowledge of what to do once the heat had been produced. I recently found one 'expert' willing to look at our boiler but travel costs and fees put the cost at nearly £500 before any work was done. I don't regret going for something greener, but if I had chosen oil there is someone a 30 second drive away who could fit and service a boiler, relying on designs that have had years to reach their peak.

    Again, thanks for all the advice. It's a steep learning curve.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2010
     
    Posted By: Davebrigg

    The PHx does not regulate the temperature of the rads. Getting rid of it would be a relief; it slowly blocked on the CH side after being fitted (undetected leak in the CH system drained all the inhibitor) and spent last summer being soaked and flushed with Fernox.

    I Googled Acaso Ct and found an earlier post from this site by Owlman explaining its use to improve layering in the thermal store. That's another can of worms, since the current system has nothing to prevent mixing, and it doesn't take long for the tank to reach an average medium temp throughout.


    Hi David, In your particular case I'm not surprised the PHx packed in, it's one of the reasons why I suggested, ditching it on the CH circuit and its potentialy mucky water, and, going down the established good practice route. The exchanger part is susceptible to muck and sludge and calcification, but is repairable as you've no doubt discovered, There are however specialist companies that flush and clean them. It's why I personally opted for a PHx for my DHW, as opposed to a coil in the store, which once its calcified, its knackered.
    Regarding "layering"; in your particular case I think it's irrelevant, with only 1000l capacity and a high rate of use the accumulator never "settles". You're right the ACASO units do assist layering, but in your case that wasn't my reason for suggesting it. it was simply to enable a beter control of rad temp. and efficient use of store water.

    Mike
    • CommentAuthorcrusoe
    • CommentTimeAug 3rd 2010
     
    Shouldn't be any flies and ointment DB, as the micro-switch on the 'H' suffix (5 wire) MVs can fire both boiler and pump (normal), or, unsurprisingly if you cannot automate your stoking schedule, :wink:, the pump alone. Take the switched live from the valve (via timer or preferably Prog Rm Stat) to a break-on-fall immersion stat (note: not immersion heater stat!) in the TS, which will preclude any chance of the slave store reverse-tranferring heat.

    A couple of other points: You should clearly consider 1. Insulation and 2. Zoning in your property, either or both of which will make the 1000 litres go further. It's not just about producing heat ecologically, but coaxing that heat you have produced to go as far as possible. Mixing flow temps to rads/UFH helps too, as noted.

    As I repeatedly point out to clients, manual biomass needs a degree in stoking. Can you add a heatpump on off-peak into the mix? Or A N Other automatic source, to help when time is tight or wood supply less than ideal?

    There is no reason why the slave TS has to be solely on electric back-up. In the recent mild/sunny weather, a client's 1400 litre overall storage (4 tanks) was at 60C from solar alone. Big advantage of a well-specced TS is that you can add other energy sources.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press