Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    We are just starting the build of a modest single storey kitchen extension. Two of the walls on this build are specified as stud work, partly because I can build these myself, actually mainly because I can build them myself. I am keen to achieve a good level of insulation in these walls; both walls have a door and window amounting to about 40% of the wall area.

    I have been reading this forum for some months and have consulted other sources such as info on the Findhorn build and the articles by Joseph Little architects, but still at a bit of a loss to know what to do for the best.

    The architectural technician has specified these walls as 140mm stud work at 600 centres, with 140mm flexi rockwool between studs, inner face with VCL followed by 25mm battens and 12.5mm plasterboard and skim, outer side of studs having breathable membrane then 25mm studs finished with 25mm vertical timber cladding, the U value specified is 0.28W/m2K.

    I like the idea of adding an insulating sheathing to the exterior of the studs, and there seem to be a range of products such as Pavatherm, Steico therm, Gutex, Lion Fibreboard, and even OSB. My research suggests that this sheathing should be breathable but weatherproof. My reasons are to increase overall insulation levels, to minimise the thermal bridging of the studs and hopefully to use the sheathing as a sort of skin to brace the studwork and save me having to put in diagonal braces within the studs.

    My questions are:
    What experiences to people have of suitable products used in this way?
    What thickness should I go for?
    Do any of these insulation boards have structural strength such that they can brace the studwork?
    Do they still need to be supported by a breathable membrane?
    Are there other things that I should be thinking of such as different forms of between stud insulation or internal insulation, or foil backed plasterboard?
    Am I barking up the wrong tree?
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    Try sheathing the o/s of the studs with 18mm (T&G) OSB. Then apply PIR boards to the sheating, and batten fix the cladding to that...? In between the studs, if you are doing the work, cut and snugly fit PIR boards, foamed round the edge if necessary?

    Use a 89mm stud, 140 seems over kill? Keeping the studwork on the 'warm side' of the insulation will mitigate any condensation issues. Plan to get as low a U-Value as possible now, otherwise you will be kicking yourself in a few years time.....

    Good luck...:smile:
  1.  
    I suspect the 140 stud was specified in order to get the required level of insulation rather than a structural requirement. If you are going to use some form of EWI and between the stud insulation as suggested by DaryIP (sounds like a plan!) then I suggest you ask the architectural technician what size studs are needed for structural purposes.
    Peter
    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    Daryl, Peter,

    Thanks for responding. I thought, however, that OSB and PIR layer would create a non-breathable layer with danger of condensation unable to disperse from stud work? And I have heard negative comments about OSB on this forum. I am happy to reduce thickness of studs if possible but do like the idea of the wall being nice and solid, I hate those walls that bounce when you bump into them, so would be reluctant to go too slim.
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    Cobbles,

    2 storey houses are built from 89mm stud work, so strength should not be an issue.
    If you sheath the o/s with OSB, then insulate on the outside of that, you will keep the studwork at room temps, so no condensation issues should occur...

    Cheers... :smile:
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    aim at U=0.1if you possibly can
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeNov 3rd 2011
     
    Posted By: DarylP "you will keep the studwork at room temps, so no condensation issues should occur..."

    Not strictly true as it will depend on the internal RH and temperature gradient across the wall.

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=7914&page=1#Item_1
  2.  
    The safest & most airtight option is to put the OSB on the inside of the studs. Staple VCL & air barrier to OSB & tape all joints & laps.

    Putting half the insulation between the studs & half on the outside should ensure the studs stay warm. Place a breather membrane to the outside of the outer insulation, 25mm battens over that fixed back to the studs & timber cladding over the battens. Ventilate the batten cavity to aid moisture dissipation.

    David
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2011 edited
     
    ST.... Yes you are right, I knew as soon as I hit Enter that someone would come back at me! :)
    Perhaps running a condensation risk analysis would give a more predictable result...?

    Cheers...:smile:
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2011
     
    What I am trying to establish since insulation my loft/roof
    So far I have got away with it :bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeNov 4th 2011
     
    ST,

    I have done a back-of-fagpacket risk anaylsis, 80mm Kingspan K12 on the o/s of the OSB sheathing mitigates any conensation risk, Feb being the worst. This is assuming high occupancy, kitchen.

    Cheers...:wink:
    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 7th 2011
     
    Thanks for all input. I'm afraid I got out of my depth in wading through the link provided by Steamy Tea, and what is RH? I looked it up in the glossary on this forum and it said Rainwater Harvesting, but I don't think you meant that.

    Peter in Hungary, I have spoken to my architectural technician and the depth of the studs can be reduced from 140mm, that depth being specified to accommodate the insulation he specified, as , however he was reluctant to discuss other options, he just wants to specify what he knows and warned me about chasing hares on the internet.

    So there obviously are dozens of ways in which this can be done, I am favouring the suggestion by David Freeborough to put OSB on the inside (or maybe plywood, as I have an instinctive mistrust of OSB), and then some EWI outside the studs, but still unsure what this should be - can someone give a layman a summary of the pro's and cons of the different types (i.e. PIR, PUR, XPS, EPS, etc etc) and specifically which product might have enough structural integrity to brace the studs, and to reiterate my original question does anyone have any experience of any specific products, or are we not allowed to discuss propriety brands on here?

    I expect to be installing the stud work in about 3 weeks, I will keep you updated on what system I use + photographs, meanwhile any help much appreciated.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeNov 7th 2011
     
    Posted By: cobblesRH

    Relative Humidity
  3.  
    This detail may help?
  4.  
    PIR/PUR are the most expensive of the ones you list & will give the best U values, but are foil faced & so not vapour open. This means you need to make sure you have a good vapour barrier on the inside. Plywood with taped joints might be good enough. It would be safer to use polyethylene.

    XPS is slightly cheaper than PIR/PUR & has slightly higher U values, but is closed cell & so not vapour open. I prefer it to PIR/PUR because its a homogenous/uniform product which can be layered without adding unnecessary foil layers, but you still need to take care with the vapour barrier. This is my preferred insulation for use below ground because its less sensitive to ground moisture.

    EPS is significantly cheaper than XPS, has slightly higher U values than XPS & has a small degree of vapour permeability. The consensus seems to be that as long as you get the air barrier right then you don't need to worry about its vapour permeability. A graphite loaded type of EPS, often called Platinum EPS, offers similar U values to XPS at a price somewhere between the two. This is my preferred material for external wall insulation or filling existing cavity walls.

    Between studs or rafters, or when fully filling new build cavity walls, I would use Knauf Rafter Roll 32 or Knauf DriTherm 32 glass mineral wool batts. The U values are similar to Platinum EPS, but they are totally breathable & they are flexible enough to adapt to timber as it twists & bends during drying out.

    So how about k=0.032 glass mineral wool between 140mm studs & platinum EPS to the outside of the studs?

    David
    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2011
     
    Viking House, many thanks for your input, I have had a peek at your website, and thanks David for taking time to put together guide to PIR/PUR/XPS/EPS etc, but have to say it is difficult for the layman to navigate through this maze of options.

    So here is the plan - based on my inadequate knowledge:

    100mm studs (from reclamation yard - they are treated and unused)
    between studs 100 mm of probably some form of rockwool or Knauf roll suggested by David.
    outside studs a 40mm tongue and groove breathable wood fibre board (Gutex Multitherm), from supplier in Wales, it has advantage of not needing separate breather membrane, and seems greener than EPS.
    Fibreboard held in place by the 25mm battens fixed through to the studs, clad in vertical oak board or corrugated iron.
    Inside studs clad with 18mm ply or OSB, followed by VCL, followed by 25mm battens, followed by 12.5 mm plasterboard. The reason for the battens is to create a small cavity for services and therefore avoid breaching the vcl with electrical sockets etc.

    This system is for two external walls, one is west facing single storey fairly sheltered, about 5 metres long by 2.2 metres high, the other is east facing, 3.2 metres long by 2.8 metres high, moderately exposed.

    I am also finding it difficult to get a U value calc for this system, have asked various "experts" and they seem to be very slow in responding, and difficult to find anyone outside of this forum who is prepared to help with systems outside what they have "been doing for the last 20 years". And online calculators don't seem to allow for the variables I want to put in.

    Any comments, criticisms of this system very welcome, and any suggestions for variations very welcome. I do have to make a decision about this in another 2 weeks, I can't really make wall thicker as all foundations are now in and there are constraints on thickness of walls in the design.

    Thank you.
    • CommentAuthorDarylP
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2011
     
    Cobbles,

    email me at daryl at dkpservices dot co dot uk with the exact spec, and I will give you a U-value calc this pm, no worries.

    Cheers...:bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorGavin_A
    • CommentTimeNov 13th 2011
     
    Posted By: davidfreeboroughThe safest & most airtight option is to put the OSB on the inside of the studs. Staple VCL & air barrier to OSB & tape all joints & laps.

    Putting half the insulation between the studs & half on the outside should ensure the studs stay warm. Place a breather membrane to the outside of the outer insulation, 25mm battens over that fixed back to the studs & timber cladding over the battens. Ventilate the batten cavity to aid moisture dissipation.

    David

    I'm just picking this as one of many posts that I've seen mentioning this type of construction, and am genuinely interested to understand the reasoning....

    I'm confused about why people are recommending the use of an external breather membrane in situations where there is already a full internal vapour control layer.

    is this in case the vapour control layer isn't 100% vapour proof or something? or just convenience - as in it needs a wind proof layer so specify a breather membrane for its wind proofing properties.

    Personally my preference is to keep everything as vapour permeable as possible to reduce the 'OMG I've got horrible condensation problems in my wonderfully airtight new eco house' potential, but this isn't my specialist area.
  5.  
    Its partly windproofing; with the OSB inside the insulation you need a wind barrier on the outside to reduce thermal bypass & wind washing effects.

    However, it's mainly weatherproofing to keep wind drive rain out of the insulation zone. It has a very low vapour resistance, while keeping liquid water out, so overall the insulation should be a lot dryer.

    David
    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2011
     
    David, Gavin thanks for your further advice.

    Now - thanks to Daryl I have a U-value calc of 0.26 W/m2k for my wall build up - see my post above.

    I was slightly disappointed as my original wall spec put together by my architect (not an eco specialist) had a value of 0.28W/m2k, so after all my research I have saved 0.02W/m2k - which may or may not make a big difference, the numbers don't mean much to me - why can't we have a measurement system, such as "shorts and t-shirt", or "extra jumper", or "jumper, scarf and wooly hat" ? would be a lot more meaningful.

    So, this is final call for suggestions to improve on my formula - without a radical change to thickness or basic method - I have already got the 100mm studs for example. Is there something I can use to replace the plasterboard? I promise to update this thread with photos and comment on what I finally build. The build is already in progress, foundations and slab in and block work started.





    1
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2011
     
    Posted By: cobblesI was slightly disappointed as my original wall spec put together by my architect (not an eco specialist) had a value of 0.28W/m2k, so after all my research I have saved 0.02W/m2k - which may or may not make a big difference, the numbers don't mean much to me - why can't we have a measurement system, such as "shorts and t-shirt", or "extra jumper", or "jumper, scarf and wooly hat" ? would be a lot more meaningful.

    So, this is final call for suggestions to improve on my formula - without a radical change to thickness or basic method - I have already got the 100mm studs for example. Is there something I can use to replace the plasterboard? I promise to update this thread with photos and comment on what I finally build. The build is already in progress, foundations and slab in and block work started.

    The numbers are just a matter of getting used to them. Unhelpfully, better insulation has smaller numbers. 0.1 is very good - passivhaus level; 0.3 is the worst - minimum building regs (IIRC). Things go in proportion. To achieve 0.1 takes three times as much insulation as to achieve 0.3. So 0.26 is a bit better than legally required, but nothing to write home about.

    The actual thickness needed depends on the type of insulation used, and the 'figure of merit' is called lambda. Again, smaller is better. Generally, 'natural' insulations tend to be a bit poorer in performance than 'man-made' ones. Your Gutex has a lambda of 0.039 whereas EPS tends to be in the low 0.03+; closed-cell insulations are better and are somewhere in the 0.02+ region. Aerogel is below 0.02.

    So how to improve your walls? The most obvious improvement is to insulate your service cavity. As well as all the pipes and wires, you can fill that cavity with rockwool or suchlike to make a small improvement. Beyond that you either need to switch to materials that have a lower lambda, or add more thickness.
    • CommentAuthorcobbles
    • CommentTimeNov 19th 2011
     
    djh,
    many thanks for the clarification of the U-value numbers, and advice in insulating the service cavity - I'll look into it. Otherwise it looks like change of materials or going thicker.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press