Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.

The AECB accepts no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. Views given in posts are not necessarily the views of the AECB.



  1.  
    So.. Further to my last large topic regarding pipe sizes I am in a bit of a quandary.. what ever one of those is..Basically I am renovating a 1930's largish 3 bed semi. I am intending to install a 300 ltr thermal store, gas boiler and solar thermal collector on the roof. For some reason and I am more than happy to listen to arguments for and against here, I want the Thermal store to provide heat for the ground floor under floor heating, the rads on the first floor and DHW. I do however want the DHW to be mains pressure. Now this either means (I think) an un-vented cylinder with the water in the tank being used as the DHW or that water being used to heat the mains pressure water via heat exchangers. I would like to do the latter. I have had quotes ranging from 3.5k to about 1.7k including VAT. The Un-vented system look cheaper, (and if anyone has any good steers on one of these they would be much appreciated) but for some reason, (legionella) I am unwilling to have the DHW sat in the tank. The way I am thinking about it now and I am sorry if I am being less than succinct here, is that the tank will be connected to the boiler. That connection will be by a coil. the underfloor heating will be a coil in and the rads will be a coil in. I will need a boiler heating coil, a solar coil and a DHW either external plate heat exchanger or a coil. I think I can get an AKVAIR SOLAR 300ltr for about £1500 but would still need to pay for all the plumbing, pumps, and associated pipe-work. McDonalds and Newarke cylinders are I think offering something along the same lines for a similar price, both in copper. I think these can be vented or un-vented. All the steel un-vented cylinders seem to be much more 'main stream' and don't seem to do what I want. I am speaking to RM cylinders through H2solar and they are being helpful but I think I may be hard of understanding as they are saying use the water in the tank as DHW. Am I worrying over nothing? How much is all the associated paraphernalia of pumps and valves etc going to cost. Should I be using a regular boiler for this? Are Regular boilers Ok for vented and un-vented. As you may well be aware by now, I am no plumber, I am however confused and running out of funds.I have bought and installed by insulated flexible steel pipe in readiness for my solar panels. I have all drainage and pipe-work ready in the allotted cupboard for the tank and to the wall where the boiler goes. Anyone feel like saying 'this is what you need, this is why you need it and this is how much it is going to cost you and yes you will get change from 3k!

    Sorry to be so meandering. Its late-ish and this is beginning to stump me as I need to get things ordered and in quite soon before the money really does run out.
  2.  
    Hi Matt,

    We are proposing similar setup although I was thinking a bigger store. Sorry my level of knowledge is probably similar to yours so I don't have any insight into the vented/unvented question but there seems to be concerns over compatibility of gas boiler and TS, how are you proposing connecting your boiler to the TS?

    Have you been following the thread:
    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=8511&page=1#Item_5
  3.  
    HI,
    I have been reading through that yes, and the connection between the boiler and the tank was going to be via a coil in making a closed circuit. What I am concerned about is that the tank water will then be used to heat a coil to do the rads, heat a coil doing the UFH and either be used as the actual UFH or to heat a coil or heat exchanger externally for the DHW. There will also be a coil in for the solar panel. That makes 5 coils at a maximum and four at a minimum. I am concerned about having the tank water as DHW for Legionella reasons and also because I live in an area of very hard water. If the tank is a closed system too, it can be dosed up with inhibitor which will stop the coils calcyfying up. The only one to do so should be the DHW coil. If this is an external heat exchanger then it is easily flushed or replaced without disturbing the rest of the set up too much... I don't know if I am worrying un-necessarily though.
  4.  
    Sorry if I have missed something but if you go with the TS option then you would not need the coils for the rads and UFH would you, as the whole tank is a closed circuit, they could all come off the tank directly at appropriate positions then you only need coil for DHW or flat plate heat exchanger type and coil for solar. Does having a coil in TS for the boiler improve the situation with gas condensing boilers?

    We are in very hard water area as well and we have had a nightmare with our current copper unvented cylinder after 10 years its falling apart. I was planning a good efficient water softener with the hope that that would avoid scaling problems, I am assuming it will solve the problem?
    •  
      CommentAuthorJSHarris
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2012
     
    IIRC the risk of calcification in pipes is strongly temperature dependent as it comes primarily from thermal decomposition of bicarbonates to carbonates. If you keep the DHW temperature below around 50 to 55 deg C then the pipes take a long time to build up any appreciable scale deposits.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2012
     
    I can't comment on your individual renovation projects Matt and Phil, just give the broad scenario based on my own experience.
    First Matt, there may be space reasons why you have opted to go for a 300l store, but my gut feeling, personal experience again is it's too small to provide CH and DHW in the depths of a bad winter, which IMHO is what you should be planning for. You may have insulated the hell out of the place and your calcs say otherwise, in which case carry on but just be cautious.
    Regarding the more general points I see no reason why the water in the store,rads,UFH and boiler should not all be the same i.e. direct and not via coils. That same non potable water is also used on the primary feed to your PHx. What you are left with is simply one coil heating the store from your solar array. Using this sort of set up, and I accept there are other solutions, means your store doesn't have to be stainless, copper, or ceramic lined as would be the case if it were used for DHW. This theoretically keeps the material, the internal design, and hence cost of the store down and you can spend the money on a good quality PHx to give you hot and cold pressurised DHW at the taps. Speaking as one who runs a faily large PHx I can personally vouch for their efficiency.
    Now your other point regarding vented v. unvented systems. Speak to two heating engineers/plumbers and you'll get two answers. It's all a matter of taste, and plusses and minuses on both sides. Having first lived with a bog standard vented boiler system with potable water store in the loft I now have an unvented boiler and CH system and direct mains water, and I know which I prefer. I will never again have a vented system with convoluted pipe runs, and F&E tanks, and gallons of cold water sitting over my head in the loft. Lets face it once that cold storage tank is in the loft who goes up to periodically inspect it. I stripped mine out the other week and was disgusted at the accumulated crap in there. Having said that I do have a fireplace with a back boiler which I do have unvented with a small F&E tank, but for me that's as far as it goes for me.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2012
     
    Posted By: Phil.Chaddah-Duke........................We are in very hard water area as well and we have had a nightmare with our current copper unvented cylinder after 10 years its falling apart. I was planning a good efficient water softener with the hope that that would avoid scaling problems, I am assuming it will solve the problem?

    Polyphosphate dosing the incoming mains may help, without the expense of a water softener.
  5.  
    Having too many coils is going to be expensive. Why do you think you need coils in the tank for boiler input and heat output?

    It's more normal to use the fluid direct in the tank for both the boiler and heating circuits. Obviously you need to be careful over the design to avoid disturbing the stratification (baffles, loading valves/mixers to minimise flow rates in and out of tank etc.)

    For DHW, I don't like the tank in tank approach - it has the risk of portions of the tank that never get cycled and the commensurate risk in Legionella (if you are worried about that). Also, once the tank is depleted it will take time to warm back up again due to the limited surface area.

    I also don't like the plate heat exchanger route. It needs a pump to circulate the primary water around the heat exchanger, meaning no hot water in a power cut and the flow rate of the primary loop is likely to destroy stratification in the tank. It will also take time to heat the exchanger to provide hot water to the taps, leading to wasted water and inconvenience.

    I strongly prefer the coil in tank. With the right size of coil it can act as a compromise between tank-in-tank and a plate heat exchanger. For our intended store the coil holds something like 70 litres, so there is ready hot water sat there when it is needed. All the water through the coil is changed when the tap is run, so it doesn't sit around for long (or can be easily flushed). It also continues to deliver hat water until the store is depleted, not just the tank in tank. Finally, with a well designed coil it can pre-heat from low temperature water at the bottom of the store before being topped up with the hot water at the top. It is worthwhile making sure that the plumbing allows disconnection from the coil in case the coil needs to be flushed to remove limescale etc. but this should be relatively simple to do.
  6.  
    I don't know why I have been fixated with the number of coils. It does of course make complete sense to just have the tank as a closed system that runs to the rads, and UFH and from and back to the boiler. Would not the Solar thermal need to be in a coil though due to the different make up (Glycol etc) of the fluid within the solar system? The DHW through a removable coil does sound like the most sensible option.. Now for suppliers! Anyone?
  7.  
    Posted By: mattwpriceWould not the Solar thermal need to be in a coil though due to the different make up (Glycol etc) of the fluid within the solar system?


    Yes, the solar needs to be input through a coil or heat exchanger - you can't just use the fluid in the store. There are various arrangements for this coil - single coil at the bottom, dual coil (bottom and middle), stratifying heat exchangers, or even plate heat exchangers.

    The more complex schemes are intended to ensure that the heat is input to the store in a well stratified manner, and therefore easier to extract useful heat back out of. Of course, they are also more expensive.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 3rd 2012
     
    Posted By: MarkBennett.........."I also don't like the plate heat exchanger route. and the flow rate of the primary loop is likely to destroy stratification in the tank. It will also take time to heat the exchanger to provide hot water to the taps, leading to wasted water and inconvenience."

    Not a problem in my experience.

    "I strongly prefer the coil in tank. With the right size of coil it can act as a compromise between tank-in-tank and a plate heat exchanger. For our intended store the coil holds something like 70 litres, so there is ready hot water sat there when it is needed. All the water through the coil is changed when the tap is run, so it doesn't sit around for long (or can be easily flushed). It also continues to deliver hat water until the store is depleted, not just the tank in tank. Finally, with a well designed coil it can pre-heat from low temperature water at the bottom of the store before being topped up with the hot water at the top. It is worthwhile making sure that the plumbing allows disconnection from the coil in case the coil needs to be flushed to remove limescale etc. but this should be relatively simple to do."

    The best coils for DHW heat exchange are corrugated in construction and fairly large bore running up the centre of the tank. I read somewhere that in Germany there have been problems with these coils. Their comparatively rough interior and complex construction can lead to weaknesses and an increase in calcification especially as you could be storing water at a high temp, think Summer and your solar. That high temp water has to be reduced at the taps as Mark suggests and not all TMVs can cope with that and the blending process sort of equals out any perceived time lag on a PHx. Whatever you decide keep it simple and you won't be dissapointed.
    • CommentAuthorwookey
    • CommentTimeFeb 5th 2012
     
    Technically you can use the same water for the solar loop, but it means that the whole tank needs to have a load of antifreeze in, which is actually _very_ expensive, (or you need to be prepared to pump hot water round in freezing conditions to keep the pipes fluid. So this option is rarely chosen.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press